When Someone Other than the Addressed Recipient Speaks Next: Three Kinds of Intervening Action After the Selection of Next Speaker

IF 3 1区文学 Q1 COMMUNICATION

Research on Language and Social Interaction Pub Date : 2019-10-02 DOI:10.1080/08351813.2019.1657280

Gene H. Lerner

{"title":"When Someone Other than the Addressed Recipient Speaks Next: Three Kinds of Intervening Action After the Selection of Next Speaker","authors":"Gene H. Lerner","doi":"10.1080/08351813.2019.1657280","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT Although speakers in conversation have ways to indicate which one of their recipients ought to speak next, who actually comes to speak next is not an automatic result. There are circumstances in which a participant other than the addressed recipient of a sequence-initiating action speaks next. Here, practices aimed at allocating turns at talk form a local, moment-to-moment normative sequential environment for other-than-addressed participant intervention. Other participants can intervene: to implement the implicated sequence-responding action, to intercede on behalf of the addressed recipient by blocking the continued relevance of a response, or to interject a supplemental action that expands the sequence before a response is produced. These sequence-organizational practices both underpin and expose such culturally prescribed grounds for intervention as personal entitlement, social obligation, and group solidarity among others. Data (happen to be) in several varieties of English found in the United States.","PeriodicalId":51484,"journal":{"name":"Research on Language and Social Interaction","volume":"52 1","pages":"388 - 405"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-10-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/08351813.2019.1657280","citationCount":"13","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Research on Language and Social Interaction","FirstCategoryId":"98","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/08351813.2019.1657280","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"COMMUNICATION","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 13

Abstract

ABSTRACT Although speakers in conversation have ways to indicate which one of their recipients ought to speak next, who actually comes to speak next is not an automatic result. There are circumstances in which a participant other than the addressed recipient of a sequence-initiating action speaks next. Here, practices aimed at allocating turns at talk form a local, moment-to-moment normative sequential environment for other-than-addressed participant intervention. Other participants can intervene: to implement the implicated sequence-responding action, to intercede on behalf of the addressed recipient by blocking the continued relevance of a response, or to interject a supplemental action that expands the sequence before a response is produced. These sequence-organizational practices both underpin and expose such culturally prescribed grounds for intervention as personal entitlement, social obligation, and group solidarity among others. Data (happen to be) in several varieties of English found in the United States.

查看原文本刊更多论文

当收件人以外的人接话时:选择下一位说话者后的三种干预行为

摘要尽管谈话中的说话者有办法指示他们的接受者中的哪一个下一个应该说话，但谁下一个真正来说话并不是一个自动的结果。在某些情况下，发起行动的序列的收件人以外的参与者接下来发言。在这里，旨在分配谈话轮次的实践形成了一个局部的、即时的规范性顺序环境，用于非处理参与者干预。其他参与者可以进行干预：实施涉及的序列响应动作，通过阻止响应的持续相关性来代表被寻址的接收者进行调解，或者在产生响应之前插入扩展序列的补充动作。这些有序的组织实践既支持又暴露了文化规定的干预理由，如个人权利、社会义务和群体团结等。数据（碰巧）是在美国发现的几种英语。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

求助全文

约1分钟内获得全文求助全文

来源期刊

Research on Language and Social Interaction Multiple-

CiteScore

7.30

自引率

7.40%

发文量

期刊介绍： The journal publishes the highest quality empirical and theoretical research bearing on language as it is used in interaction. Researchers in communication, discourse analysis, conversation analysis, linguistic anthropology and ethnography are likely to be the most active contributors, but we welcome submission of articles from the broad range of interaction researchers. Published papers will normally involve the close analysis of naturally-occurring interaction. The journal is also open to theoretical essays, and to quantitative studies where these are tied closely to the results of naturalistic observation.