E. N. Ikkonen, N. García-Calderón, Ervin Stephan-Otto, E. Fuentes-Romero, A. Ibáñez-Huerta, P. Krasilnikov
{"title":"Soil contribution to CO2 fluxes in Chinampa ecosystems, Mexico","authors":"E. N. Ikkonen, N. García-Calderón, Ervin Stephan-Otto, E. Fuentes-Romero, A. Ibáñez-Huerta, P. Krasilnikov","doi":"10.3232/SJSS.2020.V10.N2.04","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Since soil CO<sub>2</sub> flux is a key component of ecosystem carbon balance, quantifying its contribution to the ecosystem carbon flux and understanding the factors that underlie its temporal variation is crucial for a better comprehension of ecosystem carbon dynamics under climate change and for optimal ecosystem use and management. Our objectives were to quantify the contributions of total soil CO<sub>2</sub> efflux (<em>F</em><sub>S</sub>) to ecosystem respiration (<em>R</em><sub>E</sub>) and heterotrophic soil CO<sub>2</sub> efflux (<em>F</em><sub>H</sub>) to <em>F</em><sub>S</sub> in two <em>chinampa</em> ecosystems with different natural grass covers. We also aimed to identify the main environmental drivers of seasonal variability of these contributions. The CO<sub>2</sub> fluxes were measured on each site about every 14 days from September 2008 to August 2009 in the Xochimilco Ecological Park in Mexico City using dark chamber techniques. For two studied sites, <em>R</em><sub>E</sub>,<em> F</em><sub>S</sub> and <em>F</em><sub>H</sub> were estimated on average as 94.1 ± 8.5, 34.7 ± 3.5 and 16.5 ± 1.7 (± S.E.) mg C-CO<sub>2</sub> m<sup>-2</sup> h<sup>-1</sup>, respectively. On average over the study period and sites, the annual cumulative <em>R</em><sub>E</sub>, <em>F</em><sub>S</sub> and <em>F</em><sub>H</sub> fluxes were 824 ± 74, 304 ± 31 and 145 ± 15 g C m<sup>-2</sup> year, respectively. The <em>R</em><sub>E</sub>, <em>F</em><sub>S</sub> and <em>F</em><sub>H</sub> varied between the winter and summer seasons; this variation was explained mostly by seasonal variations of soil temperature, soil water content and shoot plant biomass. Temperature sensitivity of CO<sub>2</sub> fluxes depended on vegetation type and plant growth differences among the sites and decreased in the following order: <em>R</em><sub>E</sub> > <em>R</em><sub>s</sub> > <em>R</em><sub>H</sub>. The contribution of <em>F</em><sub>S</sub> to <em>R</em><sub>E</sub> and <em>F</em><sub>H</sub> to <em>F</em><sub>S</sub> for the two studied sites and period averaged about 38% and 50%, respectively regardless of the site vegetation type, but the degree of <em>F</em><sub>S</sub>/<em>R</em><sub>E</sub> and <em>F</em><sub>H</sub>/<em>F</em><sub>S</sub> variability depended on the differences in seasonal dynamics of plant cover. The contribution of <em>F</em><sub>H </sub>to <em>F</em><sub>S</sub> varied from 37% in summer to 73% in winter at the site without a seasonal shift in dominant plant species, but <em>F</em><sub>H</sub>/<em>F</em><sub>S</sub> was close to constant during the year at the site with a seasonal change in dominant plant species. During the cold period, the contribution of <em>F</em><sub>H </sub>to <em>F</em><sub>S</sub> increased following plant growth decrease. The linear regression analysis showed that plant biomass was the dominant factor controlling the seasonal variation of <em>F</em><sub>H</sub>/<em>F</em><sub>S</sub> ratios, whereas the plant biomass dynamic followed the dynamics of soil water content, water table depth, and soil temperature. Our results suggest that seasonal variation of soil contribution to total fluxes from the <em>chinampa</em> ecosystem is locally differentiated. These differences were related to differences in seasonal dynamics of cover productivity which has been associated with localization of soil water content. This finding has important implications for assessing the contribution of the chinampa ecosystem to the global carbon budget.","PeriodicalId":43464,"journal":{"name":"Spanish Journal of Soil Science","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-07-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Spanish Journal of Soil Science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3232/SJSS.2020.V10.N2.04","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"SOIL SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1
Abstract
Since soil CO2 flux is a key component of ecosystem carbon balance, quantifying its contribution to the ecosystem carbon flux and understanding the factors that underlie its temporal variation is crucial for a better comprehension of ecosystem carbon dynamics under climate change and for optimal ecosystem use and management. Our objectives were to quantify the contributions of total soil CO2 efflux (FS) to ecosystem respiration (RE) and heterotrophic soil CO2 efflux (FH) to FS in two chinampa ecosystems with different natural grass covers. We also aimed to identify the main environmental drivers of seasonal variability of these contributions. The CO2 fluxes were measured on each site about every 14 days from September 2008 to August 2009 in the Xochimilco Ecological Park in Mexico City using dark chamber techniques. For two studied sites, RE, FS and FH were estimated on average as 94.1 ± 8.5, 34.7 ± 3.5 and 16.5 ± 1.7 (± S.E.) mg C-CO2 m-2 h-1, respectively. On average over the study period and sites, the annual cumulative RE, FS and FH fluxes were 824 ± 74, 304 ± 31 and 145 ± 15 g C m-2 year, respectively. The RE, FS and FH varied between the winter and summer seasons; this variation was explained mostly by seasonal variations of soil temperature, soil water content and shoot plant biomass. Temperature sensitivity of CO2 fluxes depended on vegetation type and plant growth differences among the sites and decreased in the following order: RE > Rs > RH. The contribution of FS to RE and FH to FS for the two studied sites and period averaged about 38% and 50%, respectively regardless of the site vegetation type, but the degree of FS/RE and FH/FS variability depended on the differences in seasonal dynamics of plant cover. The contribution of FH to FS varied from 37% in summer to 73% in winter at the site without a seasonal shift in dominant plant species, but FH/FS was close to constant during the year at the site with a seasonal change in dominant plant species. During the cold period, the contribution of FH to FS increased following plant growth decrease. The linear regression analysis showed that plant biomass was the dominant factor controlling the seasonal variation of FH/FS ratios, whereas the plant biomass dynamic followed the dynamics of soil water content, water table depth, and soil temperature. Our results suggest that seasonal variation of soil contribution to total fluxes from the chinampa ecosystem is locally differentiated. These differences were related to differences in seasonal dynamics of cover productivity which has been associated with localization of soil water content. This finding has important implications for assessing the contribution of the chinampa ecosystem to the global carbon budget.
由于土壤二氧化碳通量是生态系统碳平衡的关键组成部分,量化其对生态系统碳通量的贡献并了解其时间变化的因素对于更好地理解气候变化下的生态系统碳动力学以及生态系统的最佳利用和管理至关重要。我们的目标是量化两个具有不同天然草地覆盖的chinampa生态系统中土壤总CO2流出(FS)对生态系统呼吸(RE)和异养土壤CO2流出(FH)对FS的贡献。我们还旨在确定这些贡献的季节变化的主要环境驱动因素。从2008年9月到2009年8月,在墨西哥城的Xochimilco生态公园,使用暗室技术,大约每14天对每个地点的二氧化碳通量进行一次测量。对于两个研究地点,RE、FS和FH的平均值分别估计为94.1±8.5、34.7±3.5和16.5±1.7(±S.E.)mg C-CO2 m-2 h-1。在研究期间和研究地点,年累积RE、FS和FH通量分别为824±74、304±31和145±15 g C m-2年。RE、FS和FH在冬季和夏季之间变化;这种变化主要由土壤温度、土壤含水量和地上部植物生物量的季节变化来解释。CO2通量的温度敏感性取决于不同地点的植被类型和植物生长差异,并按RE>Rs>RH的顺序递减。无论站点植被类型如何,两个研究站点和时段的FS对RE和FH对FS的贡献平均分别约为38%和50%,但FS/RE和FH/FS的变异程度取决于植物覆盖季节动态的差异。FH对FS的贡献从夏季的37%到冬季的73%不等,优势植物物种没有季节性变化,但FH/FS在一年中几乎不变,优势植物种类有季节性变化。在寒冷时期,FH对FS的贡献随着植物生长的减少而增加。线性回归分析表明,植物生物量是控制FH/FS比值季节变化的主导因素,而植物生物量动态遵循土壤含水量、地下水位深度和土壤温度的动态。我们的研究结果表明,chinmpa生态系统土壤对总通量贡献的季节变化是局部分化的。这些差异与覆被生产力的季节动态差异有关,而覆被生产力与土壤含水量的定位有关。这一发现对评估chinampa生态系统对全球碳预算的贡献具有重要意义。
期刊介绍:
The Spanish Journal of Soil Science (SJSS) is a peer-reviewed journal with open access for the publication of Soil Science research, which is published every four months. This publication welcomes works from all parts of the world and different geographic areas. It aims to publish original, innovative, and high-quality scientific papers related to field and laboratory research on all basic and applied aspects of Soil Science. The journal is also interested in interdisciplinary studies linked to soil research, short communications presenting new findings and applications, and invited state of art reviews. The journal focuses on all the different areas of Soil Science represented by the Spanish Society of Soil Science: soil genesis, morphology and micromorphology, physics, chemistry, biology, mineralogy, biochemistry and its functions, classification, survey, and soil information systems; soil fertility and plant nutrition, hydrology and geomorphology; soil evaluation and land use planning; soil protection and conservation; soil degradation and remediation; soil quality; soil-plant relationships; soils and land use change; sustainability of ecosystems; soils and environmental quality; methods of soil analysis; pedometrics; new techniques and soil education. Other fields with growing interest include: digital soil mapping, soil nanotechnology, the modelling of biological and biochemical processes, mechanisms and processes responsible for the mobilization and immobilization of nutrients, organic matter stabilization, biogeochemical nutrient cycles, the influence of climatic change on soil processes and soil-plant relationships, carbon sequestration, and the role of soils in climatic change and ecological and environmental processes.