How does the design of landmarks on a mobile map influence wayfinding experts’ spatial learning during a real-world navigation task?

IF 2.6 3区 地球科学 Q1 GEOGRAPHY
Armand Kapaj, Sara Lanini-Maggi, Christopher Hilton, Bingjie Cheng, S. Fabrikant
{"title":"How does the design of landmarks on a mobile map influence wayfinding experts’ spatial learning during a real-world navigation task?","authors":"Armand Kapaj, Sara Lanini-Maggi, Christopher Hilton, Bingjie Cheng, S. Fabrikant","doi":"10.1080/15230406.2023.2183525","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT Humans increasingly rely on GPS-enabled mobile maps to navigate novel environments. However, this reliance can negatively affect spatial learning, which can be detrimental even for expert navigators such as search and rescue personnel. Landmark visualization has been shown to improve spatial learning in general populations by facilitating object identification between the map and the environment. How landmark visualization supports expert users’ spatial learning during map-assisted navigation is still an open research question. We thus conducted a real-world study with wayfinding experts in an unknown residential neighborhood. We aimed to assess how two different landmark visualization styles (abstract 2D vs. realistic 3D buildings) would affect experts’ spatial learning in a map-assisted navigation task during an emergency scenario. Using a between-subjects design, we asked Swiss military personnel to follow a given route using a mobile map, and to identify five task-relevant landmarks along the route. We recorded experts’ gaze behavior while navigating and examined their spatial learning after the navigation task. We found that experts’ spatial learning improved when they focused their visual attention on the environment, but the direction of attention between the map and the environment was not affected by the landmark visualization style. Further, there was no difference in spatial learning between the 2D and 3D groups. Contrary to previous research with general populations, this study suggests that the landmark visualization style does not enhance expert navigators’ navigation or spatial learning abilities, thus highlighting the need for population-specific mobile map design solutions.","PeriodicalId":47562,"journal":{"name":"Cartography and Geographic Information Science","volume":"50 1","pages":"197 - 213"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2023-03-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cartography and Geographic Information Science","FirstCategoryId":"89","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/15230406.2023.2183525","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"GEOGRAPHY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

ABSTRACT Humans increasingly rely on GPS-enabled mobile maps to navigate novel environments. However, this reliance can negatively affect spatial learning, which can be detrimental even for expert navigators such as search and rescue personnel. Landmark visualization has been shown to improve spatial learning in general populations by facilitating object identification between the map and the environment. How landmark visualization supports expert users’ spatial learning during map-assisted navigation is still an open research question. We thus conducted a real-world study with wayfinding experts in an unknown residential neighborhood. We aimed to assess how two different landmark visualization styles (abstract 2D vs. realistic 3D buildings) would affect experts’ spatial learning in a map-assisted navigation task during an emergency scenario. Using a between-subjects design, we asked Swiss military personnel to follow a given route using a mobile map, and to identify five task-relevant landmarks along the route. We recorded experts’ gaze behavior while navigating and examined their spatial learning after the navigation task. We found that experts’ spatial learning improved when they focused their visual attention on the environment, but the direction of attention between the map and the environment was not affected by the landmark visualization style. Further, there was no difference in spatial learning between the 2D and 3D groups. Contrary to previous research with general populations, this study suggests that the landmark visualization style does not enhance expert navigators’ navigation or spatial learning abilities, thus highlighting the need for population-specific mobile map design solutions.
在现实世界的导航任务中,移动地图上的地标设计如何影响寻路专家的空间学习?
摘要人类越来越依赖GPS移动地图来导航新环境。然而,这种依赖可能会对空间学习产生负面影响,即使对搜救人员等专业导航人员来说也是有害的。地标可视化已被证明可以通过促进地图和环境之间的物体识别来改善普通人群的空间学习。在地图辅助导航过程中,地标可视化如何支持专家用户的空间学习仍然是一个悬而未决的研究问题。因此,我们与寻路专家在一个未知的居民区进行了一项现实世界的研究。我们旨在评估两种不同的地标可视化风格(抽象的2D建筑和逼真的3D建筑)在紧急情况下如何影响专家在地图辅助导航任务中的空间学习。使用科目间设计,我们要求瑞士军事人员使用移动地图遵循给定的路线,并确定路线上五个与任务相关的地标。我们记录了专家在导航时的凝视行为,并检查了他们在导航任务后的空间学习情况。我们发现,当专家将视觉注意力集中在环境上时,他们的空间学习能力有所提高,但地图和环境之间的注意力方向不受地标可视化风格的影响。此外,2D组和3D组在空间学习方面没有差异。与之前对普通人群的研究相反,这项研究表明,地标可视化风格并不能提高专业导航员的导航或空间学习能力,从而突出了对特定人群移动地图设计解决方案的需求。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.20
自引率
20.00%
发文量
23
期刊介绍: Cartography and Geographic Information Science (CaGIS) is the official publication of the Cartography and Geographic Information Society (CaGIS), a member organization of the American Congress on Surveying and Mapping (ACSM). The Cartography and Geographic Information Society supports research, education, and practices that improve the understanding, creation, analysis, and use of maps and geographic information. The society serves as a forum for the exchange of original concepts, techniques, approaches, and experiences by those who design, implement, and use geospatial technologies through the publication of authoritative articles and international papers.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信