Correlation between disc damage likelihood scale and vertical cup disc ratio with Automated Humphrey Perimetry in glaucoma patients attending a tertiary care hospital, Kathmandu, Nepal

Pranisha Singh, A. P. Rijal
{"title":"Correlation between disc damage likelihood scale and vertical cup disc ratio with Automated Humphrey Perimetry in glaucoma patients attending a tertiary care hospital, Kathmandu, Nepal","authors":"Pranisha Singh, A. P. Rijal","doi":"10.3126/nmcj.v24i2.46036","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Glaucoma is the second leading ocular disease of irreversible blindness. Glaucoma is a progressive disorder and requires serial evaluation in order to monitor disease progression and optimize therapy. The objective of this study was to determine the correlation between disc damage likelihood scale (DDLS) and vertical cup disc ratio (VCDR) with the results of Humphrey field analyzer (HFA) parameters. This study was a descriptive, cross-sectional and observational study. A total of 104 eyes of 52 patients diagnosed with primary open angle glaucoma or normal tension glaucoma were examined. DDLS staging, VCDR and HFA 24-2 visual fields were obtained from the patients. The correlation of DDLS and VCDR with Mean deviation (MD), Pattern standard deviation (PSD) and Glaucoma hemi field test (GHT) of HFA was calculated by Pearson correlation coefficient (r). DDLS showed a coefficient correlation value of r = -.628, r = .391 and r = .395 (p = <0.000) when correlated against HFA MD, PSD and GHT respectively. VCDR showed a coefficient correlation value of r = -.524, r = .317 and r = .221 when correlated against HFA MD, PSD and GHT respectively. DDLS has a better correlation compared to VCDR with all the parameters.","PeriodicalId":87122,"journal":{"name":"Nepal Medical College journal : NMCJ","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-06-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nepal Medical College journal : NMCJ","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3126/nmcj.v24i2.46036","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Glaucoma is the second leading ocular disease of irreversible blindness. Glaucoma is a progressive disorder and requires serial evaluation in order to monitor disease progression and optimize therapy. The objective of this study was to determine the correlation between disc damage likelihood scale (DDLS) and vertical cup disc ratio (VCDR) with the results of Humphrey field analyzer (HFA) parameters. This study was a descriptive, cross-sectional and observational study. A total of 104 eyes of 52 patients diagnosed with primary open angle glaucoma or normal tension glaucoma were examined. DDLS staging, VCDR and HFA 24-2 visual fields were obtained from the patients. The correlation of DDLS and VCDR with Mean deviation (MD), Pattern standard deviation (PSD) and Glaucoma hemi field test (GHT) of HFA was calculated by Pearson correlation coefficient (r). DDLS showed a coefficient correlation value of r = -.628, r = .391 and r = .395 (p = <0.000) when correlated against HFA MD, PSD and GHT respectively. VCDR showed a coefficient correlation value of r = -.524, r = .317 and r = .221 when correlated against HFA MD, PSD and GHT respectively. DDLS has a better correlation compared to VCDR with all the parameters.
尼泊尔加德满都一家三级护理医院青光眼患者的椎间盘损伤可能性量表与Humphrey自动视野检查的垂直杯盘比之间的相关性
青光眼是不可逆失明的第二大眼病。青光眼是一种进行性疾病,需要进行一系列评估,以监测疾病进展并优化治疗。本研究的目的是通过Humphrey场分析仪(HFA)参数的结果来确定椎间盘损伤可能性量表(DDLS)和垂直杯盘比(VCDR)之间的相关性。本研究为描述性、横断面和观察性研究。共检查了52名被诊断为原发性开角型青光眼或正常眼压型青光眼的患者的104眼。获得患者的DDLS分期、VCDR和HFA 24-2视野。用Pearson相关系数(r)计算DDLS和VCDR与HFA的平均偏差(MD)、模式标准偏差(PSD)和青光眼半视野试验(GHT)的相关性。DDLS与HFA MD、PSD和GHT的相关系数分别为r=-0.628、r=.391和r=.395(p=0.000)。VCDR与HFA-MD、PSD和GHT的相关系数分别为r=-0.524、r=.317和r=.221。与VCDR相比,DDLS在所有参数下都具有更好的相关性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信