{"title":"El artículo 3, apartado 2, del Reglamento nº 650/2012: autoridades no judiciales y otros profesionales del Derecho","authors":"Marta Requejo Isidro","doi":"10.17103/reei.39.03","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"espanolEn los ultimos anos el TJUE ha recibido varias peticiones de interpretacion con origen en la actividad notarial, en el marco de distintos instrumentos para la cooperacion judicial civil. En este texto se abordan en particular las planteadas en relacion con el Reglamento 650/2012, de sucesiones. Tienen como objetivo ofrecer una explicacion de la respuesta del TJUE, al tiempo que pone en tela de juicio el metodo de interpretacion empleado. Incluye ademas reflexiones sobre la posible incorporacion directa del notario (y otros profesionales del Derecho) al “dialogo judicial” con el TJUE a traves de la cuestion prejudicial. EnglishIn recent years, the CJEU has received several requests for a preliminary ruling originating from a notarial activity within the framework of different instruments for civil judicial cooperation. This text focuses on those related to Regulation 650/2012 – the “successions Regulation”. It aims to provide an explanation of the judgments of the CJEU, while calling into question its method of interpretation. It reflects as well on the possible incorporation of the notaries (and other legal professionals) to the “judicial dialogue” with the CJEU, allowing them to directly refer requests for interpretation.","PeriodicalId":40338,"journal":{"name":"Revista Electronica de Estudios Internacionales","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2020-06-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Revista Electronica de Estudios Internacionales","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.17103/reei.39.03","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"LAW","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
espanolEn los ultimos anos el TJUE ha recibido varias peticiones de interpretacion con origen en la actividad notarial, en el marco de distintos instrumentos para la cooperacion judicial civil. En este texto se abordan en particular las planteadas en relacion con el Reglamento 650/2012, de sucesiones. Tienen como objetivo ofrecer una explicacion de la respuesta del TJUE, al tiempo que pone en tela de juicio el metodo de interpretacion empleado. Incluye ademas reflexiones sobre la posible incorporacion directa del notario (y otros profesionales del Derecho) al “dialogo judicial” con el TJUE a traves de la cuestion prejudicial. EnglishIn recent years, the CJEU has received several requests for a preliminary ruling originating from a notarial activity within the framework of different instruments for civil judicial cooperation. This text focuses on those related to Regulation 650/2012 – the “successions Regulation”. It aims to provide an explanation of the judgments of the CJEU, while calling into question its method of interpretation. It reflects as well on the possible incorporation of the notaries (and other legal professionals) to the “judicial dialogue” with the CJEU, allowing them to directly refer requests for interpretation.