EFFICACY OF ACETIC ACID VERSUS CIPROFLOXACIN EAR DROPS IN ACHIEVING DRY EARS IN CHRONIC SUPPURATIVE OTITIS MEDIA IN ADULT POPULATION OF ISLAMABAD, PAKISTAN: A NON-RANDOMIZED CONTROL TRIAL

IF 0.5 Q3 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
A. Akhtar, Syed Maisam Ali, S. Naqi, T. Aziz, Wajih-ud-din Shinwari, Syed Faizan Hassan Shah
{"title":"EFFICACY OF ACETIC ACID VERSUS CIPROFLOXACIN EAR DROPS IN ACHIEVING DRY EARS IN CHRONIC SUPPURATIVE OTITIS MEDIA IN ADULT POPULATION OF ISLAMABAD, PAKISTAN: A NON-RANDOMIZED CONTROL TRIAL","authors":"A. Akhtar, Syed Maisam Ali, S. Naqi, T. Aziz, Wajih-ud-din Shinwari, Syed Faizan Hassan Shah","doi":"10.46903/gjms/17.03.2007","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Chronic suppurative otitis media (CSMO) is an important cause of preventable hearing loss, particularly in developing world. The objective of this trial was to compare efficacy of 2% acetic acid versus 0.3% ciprofloxacin ear drops in achieving dry ears in CSMO in adult population of Islamabad, Pakistan. \nMaterials & Methods: This trial was conducted at Department of ENT, HBS Medical College, Islamabad, Pakistan from March 2018 to February 2019. With alpha 5%, beta 20% and power of study 80%, sample size was calculated 47 for each group. All adult patients of CSOM, having ear discharge for more than three months were eligible. Patients with aural poly, external auditory canal pathology, ear malignancy, having mastoid surgery in preceding 12 months or having used antibiotics in last one week were excluded. Experimental group received 2% acetic acid, twice daily while control group received 0.3% ciprofloxacin eardrops twice daily. At two weeks, achievement of dry ears was noted. Sex and age in years were matching variables. Primary end point was achieving dry ears, which was compared between the two groups using McNemar chi-square test. \nResults: Experimental group included 30 (63.8%) men and 17 (36.2%) women and control group included 32 (68%) men and 15 (32%) women. Mean age of experimental group 36±2.14 years was matching to the control group 36±2.59 years. Dry ears were achieved in 35 (74.47%) patients in experimental group and in 11 (23.40%) patients in control group. The efficacy of 2% acetic acid was significantly higher than 0.3% ciprofloxacin eardrops in achieving dry ears (p<0.0001) in CSMO. \nConclusion: The efficacy of 2% acetic acid was significantly higher than 0.3% ciprofloxacin eardrops in achieving dry ears in chronic suppurative otitis media in adult population of Islamabad, Pakistan.","PeriodicalId":44174,"journal":{"name":"Gomal Journal of Medical Sciences","volume":"17 1","pages":"90-94"},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2020-07-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"6","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Gomal Journal of Medical Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.46903/gjms/17.03.2007","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 6

Abstract

Background: Chronic suppurative otitis media (CSMO) is an important cause of preventable hearing loss, particularly in developing world. The objective of this trial was to compare efficacy of 2% acetic acid versus 0.3% ciprofloxacin ear drops in achieving dry ears in CSMO in adult population of Islamabad, Pakistan. Materials & Methods: This trial was conducted at Department of ENT, HBS Medical College, Islamabad, Pakistan from March 2018 to February 2019. With alpha 5%, beta 20% and power of study 80%, sample size was calculated 47 for each group. All adult patients of CSOM, having ear discharge for more than three months were eligible. Patients with aural poly, external auditory canal pathology, ear malignancy, having mastoid surgery in preceding 12 months or having used antibiotics in last one week were excluded. Experimental group received 2% acetic acid, twice daily while control group received 0.3% ciprofloxacin eardrops twice daily. At two weeks, achievement of dry ears was noted. Sex and age in years were matching variables. Primary end point was achieving dry ears, which was compared between the two groups using McNemar chi-square test. Results: Experimental group included 30 (63.8%) men and 17 (36.2%) women and control group included 32 (68%) men and 15 (32%) women. Mean age of experimental group 36±2.14 years was matching to the control group 36±2.59 years. Dry ears were achieved in 35 (74.47%) patients in experimental group and in 11 (23.40%) patients in control group. The efficacy of 2% acetic acid was significantly higher than 0.3% ciprofloxacin eardrops in achieving dry ears (p<0.0001) in CSMO. Conclusion: The efficacy of 2% acetic acid was significantly higher than 0.3% ciprofloxacin eardrops in achieving dry ears in chronic suppurative otitis media in adult population of Islamabad, Pakistan.
醋酸滴耳剂与环丙沙星滴耳剂在巴基斯坦伊斯兰堡成人慢性化脓性中耳炎患者中实现耳朵干燥的疗效:一项非随机对照试验
背景:慢性化脓性中耳炎(CSMO)是可预防的听力损失的一个重要原因,特别是在发展中国家。本试验的目的是比较2%醋酸滴耳剂和0.3%环丙沙星滴耳剂在巴基斯坦伊斯兰堡成年CSMO患者实现耳干的疗效。材料与方法:本试验于2018年3月至2019年2月在巴基斯坦伊斯兰堡HBS医学院耳鼻喉科进行。α为5%,β为20%,研究权为80%,每组的样本量计算为47。所有耳部分泌物超过3个月的成年CSOM患者均入选。排除耳部息肉、外耳道病变、耳部恶性肿瘤、前12个月有乳突手术或最近一周使用抗生素的患者。实验组给予2%醋酸滴耳剂,每日2次;对照组给予0.3%环丙沙星滴耳剂,每日2次。两周后,发现耳朵干了。性别和年龄是匹配变量。主要终点为干耳,两组间比较采用McNemar卡方检验。结果:试验组男性30人(63.8%),女性17人(36.2%);对照组男性32人(68%),女性15人(32%)。实验组平均年龄(36±2.14)岁,对照组平均年龄(36±2.59)岁。实验组35例(74.47%),对照组11例(23.40%)。2%醋酸滴耳剂对CSMO患者耳干的效果显著高于0.3%环丙沙星滴耳剂(p<0.0001)。结论:2%醋酸滴耳剂治疗巴基斯坦伊斯兰堡地区成人慢性化脓性中耳炎的效果明显高于0.3%环丙沙星滴耳剂。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Gomal Journal of Medical Sciences
Gomal Journal of Medical Sciences MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL-
CiteScore
0.60
自引率
80.00%
发文量
37
审稿时长
40 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信