The Formation of Christendom, 2nd ed. by Judith Herrin (review)

IF 0.5 0 HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY
Sam Ottewill-Soulsby
{"title":"The Formation of Christendom, 2nd ed. by Judith Herrin (review)","authors":"Sam Ottewill-Soulsby","doi":"10.1353/jla.2023.0010","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"of the Columbian exchange, which Diamond and his predecessors, historians of disease Alfred Crosby and William McNeil, mark as a global biological turning point. Harper interjects, making notable revisions to past immunological conclusions using our present understanding of genetics and immunity. An account of the Mayflower begins chapter 8, an introductory backdrop to New World colonization, the ensuing African slave trade, and their facilitation of pathogen transmission both old and new(er) to Atlantic shores—for example, viruses causing malaria (old), yellow fever (newer), and smallpox (older). Part Three ends back in Europe, centered on grisly accounts of the rise of typhus (caused by the parasite Rickettsia prowazekii) and the destructive re-emergence of smallpox (perhaps a more virulent strain of the virus) that spanned Eurasia. Our species begins its early-modern break from low life expectancy in the fourth and final part of Plagues, as Harper employs his skills as an economic historian in analyzing a most crucial subject: the relationship between wealth and health. Expounding and expanding on “The Great Escape”—a term coin by economist Agnus Deaton (The Great Escape, Princeton, 2013), branding our separation from high mortality—Harper adds useful analysis, highlighting the advantages of technological and institutional progress, especially in science and medicine, on human longevity (at least, in those fortunate places). The reader of this review might be thinking, this is rather obvious; or, how original is this evaluation? Connecting advancements in science and institutions with better health is not original. It is the way in which Harper merges his expertise in both economic history and the history of disease, along with a proficient grasp of the new science recounted, which lead to novel epidemiological insights. Plagues upon the Earth has its faults; for instance, Harper’s penchant for attention-grabbing superlatives: for example, “. . . the most deadly . . . ,” “. . . humanity’s worst enemies . . . ,” and “. . . the deadliest and most dreaded . . .”—is on full display, not unlike those in the Fate of Rome. But here superlatives seem admissible. Today, this topic needs all the attention it can get, and Harper’s treatment of it should not be missed.","PeriodicalId":16220,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Late Antiquity","volume":"16 1","pages":"240 - 242"},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2023-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Late Antiquity","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1353/jla.2023.0010","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

of the Columbian exchange, which Diamond and his predecessors, historians of disease Alfred Crosby and William McNeil, mark as a global biological turning point. Harper interjects, making notable revisions to past immunological conclusions using our present understanding of genetics and immunity. An account of the Mayflower begins chapter 8, an introductory backdrop to New World colonization, the ensuing African slave trade, and their facilitation of pathogen transmission both old and new(er) to Atlantic shores—for example, viruses causing malaria (old), yellow fever (newer), and smallpox (older). Part Three ends back in Europe, centered on grisly accounts of the rise of typhus (caused by the parasite Rickettsia prowazekii) and the destructive re-emergence of smallpox (perhaps a more virulent strain of the virus) that spanned Eurasia. Our species begins its early-modern break from low life expectancy in the fourth and final part of Plagues, as Harper employs his skills as an economic historian in analyzing a most crucial subject: the relationship between wealth and health. Expounding and expanding on “The Great Escape”—a term coin by economist Agnus Deaton (The Great Escape, Princeton, 2013), branding our separation from high mortality—Harper adds useful analysis, highlighting the advantages of technological and institutional progress, especially in science and medicine, on human longevity (at least, in those fortunate places). The reader of this review might be thinking, this is rather obvious; or, how original is this evaluation? Connecting advancements in science and institutions with better health is not original. It is the way in which Harper merges his expertise in both economic history and the history of disease, along with a proficient grasp of the new science recounted, which lead to novel epidemiological insights. Plagues upon the Earth has its faults; for instance, Harper’s penchant for attention-grabbing superlatives: for example, “. . . the most deadly . . . ,” “. . . humanity’s worst enemies . . . ,” and “. . . the deadliest and most dreaded . . .”—is on full display, not unlike those in the Fate of Rome. But here superlatives seem admissible. Today, this topic needs all the attention it can get, and Harper’s treatment of it should not be missed.
《基督教世界的形成》,朱迪思·赫林第二版(书评)
戴蒙德和他的前辈,疾病历史学家阿尔弗雷德·克罗斯比和威廉·麦克尼尔,将其视为全球生物学的转折点。哈珀插话道,利用我们目前对遗传学和免疫的理解,对过去的免疫学结论做出了显著的修订。关于五月花号的叙述开始于第8章,介绍了新大陆殖民的背景,随之而来的非洲奴隶贸易,以及它们促进了新旧病原体向大西洋海岸的传播——例如,导致疟疾(旧)、黄热病(新)和天花(旧)的病毒。第三部分的结尾回到了欧洲,主要讲述了斑疹伤寒(由寄生虫拉兹氏立克次体引起)和天花(可能是一种更致命的病毒)在欧亚大陆的再次出现。在《瘟疫》的第四部分,也是最后一部分,人类开始了其早期的现代生活,摆脱了低预期寿命,哈珀运用他作为经济历史学家的技能,分析了一个最关键的主题:财富与健康之间的关系。“大逃亡”(The Great Escape)是经济学家阿格努斯·迪顿(Agnus Deaton)在《大逃亡》(The Great Escape, Princeton, 2013)中创造的术语,标志着我们与高死亡率的分离。哈珀在“大逃亡”一词的基础上进行了阐述和扩展,并添加了有用的分析,强调了技术和制度进步对人类寿命的好处,尤其是在科学和医学方面(至少在那些幸运的地方)。这篇评论的读者可能会想,这是相当明显的;或者说,这个评价有多原创?将科学和机构的进步与更好的健康联系起来并非原创。哈珀将他在经济史和疾病史方面的专业知识与对新科学的熟练掌握结合在一起,从而产生了新颖的流行病学见解。地球上的瘟疫有它的缺点;例如,哈珀喜欢使用引人注目的最高级词汇:例如,“……最致命的……、“”……人类最大的敌人……、“和”……最致命和最可怕的……”——这一点与《罗马的命运》如出一辙。但在这里,最高级似乎是可以接受的。今天,这个话题需要得到所有的关注,哈珀对它的处理不应该被错过。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Late Antiquity
Journal of Late Antiquity HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY-
CiteScore
0.80
自引率
50.00%
发文量
18
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信