The Most Absolute Abolition: Runaways, Vigilance Committees, and the Rise of Revolutionary Abolitionism, 1835–1861 by Jesse Olsavsky (review)

IF 0.2 Q4 HISTORY
C. Faulkner
{"title":"The Most Absolute Abolition: Runaways, Vigilance Committees, and the Rise of Revolutionary Abolitionism, 1835–1861 by Jesse Olsavsky (review)","authors":"C. Faulkner","doi":"10.1353/khs.2023.a902568","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In this illuminating history of the Underground Railroad, Jesse Olsavsky places vigilance committees and fugitives at the center of the antislavery movement. The title is a quote from Ralph Waldo Emerson, who called vigilance committee members “abolitionists of the most absolute abolition” (p. 8). Olsavsky describes the emergence and work of the vigilance committees (VCs), in collaboration with runaways, as bridging ideological divides and driving a more confrontational approach to ending slavery. He views vigilance committees, and by extension, the Underground Railroad, as a social movement, and traces the organizations, networks, ideas, and methods that sustained it. Olsavsky ultimately argues that fugitive slaves became the teachers and scholars of abolition through VCs. Many previous historians have viewed the Underground Railroad as a side project of abolitionists, one that involved isolated and dramatic acts of bravery by runaways and activists. Olsavsky describes the vigilance committees and their allies as a highly organized, practical, and effective movement that was built on the knowledge of fugitives. As he writes, “Antislavery societies focused on propaganda and ideas; VCs helped fugitives” (p. 61). Olsavsky highlights the importance of what might seem like the mundane record-keeping of VCs. For example, vigilance committee agents William Still, Jermain Loguen, and others conducted extensive interviews with runaways in order to document the evils of slavery, deepen their arguments, bolster their networks, and consider the best ways to resist slavery. Based on existing records, Olsavsky estimates that VCs helped thousands of fugitives and perhaps as many as twenty thousand. Olsavsky joins other recent scholars in emphasizing the leadership of Black activists in abolition. He notes the diversity of the vigilance","PeriodicalId":40382,"journal":{"name":"Register of the Kentucky Historical Society","volume":"121 1","pages":"68 - 69"},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Register of the Kentucky Historical Society","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1353/khs.2023.a902568","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"HISTORY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In this illuminating history of the Underground Railroad, Jesse Olsavsky places vigilance committees and fugitives at the center of the antislavery movement. The title is a quote from Ralph Waldo Emerson, who called vigilance committee members “abolitionists of the most absolute abolition” (p. 8). Olsavsky describes the emergence and work of the vigilance committees (VCs), in collaboration with runaways, as bridging ideological divides and driving a more confrontational approach to ending slavery. He views vigilance committees, and by extension, the Underground Railroad, as a social movement, and traces the organizations, networks, ideas, and methods that sustained it. Olsavsky ultimately argues that fugitive slaves became the teachers and scholars of abolition through VCs. Many previous historians have viewed the Underground Railroad as a side project of abolitionists, one that involved isolated and dramatic acts of bravery by runaways and activists. Olsavsky describes the vigilance committees and their allies as a highly organized, practical, and effective movement that was built on the knowledge of fugitives. As he writes, “Antislavery societies focused on propaganda and ideas; VCs helped fugitives” (p. 61). Olsavsky highlights the importance of what might seem like the mundane record-keeping of VCs. For example, vigilance committee agents William Still, Jermain Loguen, and others conducted extensive interviews with runaways in order to document the evils of slavery, deepen their arguments, bolster their networks, and consider the best ways to resist slavery. Based on existing records, Olsavsky estimates that VCs helped thousands of fugitives and perhaps as many as twenty thousand. Olsavsky joins other recent scholars in emphasizing the leadership of Black activists in abolition. He notes the diversity of the vigilance
《最绝对的废除:逃亡者、警戒委员会和革命废奴主义的兴起,1835-1861》杰西·奥尔萨夫斯基著(评论)
杰西·奥尔萨夫斯基(Jesse Olsavsky)将警戒委员会和逃亡者置于反奴隶制运动的中心。书名是引用拉尔夫·沃尔多·爱默生的话,他称警戒委员会成员是“最绝对废除的废奴主义者”(第8页)。奥尔萨夫斯基描述了警戒委员会(VCs)的出现和工作,与逃亡者合作,弥合意识形态分歧,推动一种更具对对性的方式来结束奴隶制。他将警惕性委员会,延伸到地下铁路,视为一种社会运动,并追溯了维持它的组织、网络、思想和方法。奥尔萨夫斯基最后认为,逃亡的奴隶通过风险投资成为废奴运动的教师和学者。以前的许多历史学家都认为地下铁路是废奴主义者的一个副业,一个涉及逃亡者和激进分子的孤立和戏剧性的勇敢行为的项目。奥尔萨夫斯基把警戒委员会和他们的盟友描述为一个高度组织化的、实际的、有效的运动,它建立在对逃犯的了解之上。正如他所写的,“反奴隶制社会专注于宣传和思想;风险投资帮助逃亡者”(第61页)。奥尔萨夫斯基强调了风投公司看似平凡的记录工作的重要性。例如,警戒委员会特工威廉·斯蒂尔、杰曼·洛根和其他人对离家出走者进行了广泛的采访,以记录奴隶制的罪恶,深化他们的论点,加强他们的网络,并考虑抵制奴隶制的最佳方法。根据现有记录,奥尔萨夫斯基估计,风投帮助了数千名逃犯,甚至可能多达2万人。奥尔萨夫斯基和最近的其他学者一样,强调黑人激进分子在废奴运动中的领导作用。他注意到警惕性的多样性
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书