Travelling the scenic landscape: Community, nationalism and precarity in Nomadland (2020)

IF 0.3 0 PHILOSOPHY
Timo Lindemann
{"title":"Travelling the scenic landscape: Community, nationalism and precarity in Nomadland (2020)","authors":"Timo Lindemann","doi":"10.1386/ejpc_00039_1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The aim of this article is to interrogate the use of US rural landscape in the 2020 film Nomadland and its account of contemporary precarity and poverty in the United States. I argue that while the film is ostensibly invested in locating alternative modes of living in the face\n of neo-liberal marginalization, it ultimately reaffirms neo-liberalism’s core tenet, individualism, through its fascination with what Kenneth Olwig calls the ‘scenic’ landscape. This approach to landscape understands nature as an unchanging ‘stage’ on which a\n nation’s history is played out and thus ultimately naturalizes nationalism. Thereby, the film reaffirms the myth of the ‘wide open spaces’ of American landscape which has historically been instrumental in the displacement of people excluded from US national identity on the\n basis of class and race. This can be contrasted with a more interactive, more inclusive approach to landscape which understands landscape as the result of interaction between a community and its environment. Recent US films such as Leave No Trace (2018) identify precisely such an interactive\n understanding as a basis for potential resistance against the forces of neo-liberalism which perpetuate precarity.","PeriodicalId":40280,"journal":{"name":"Empedocles-European Journal for the Philosophy of Communication","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.3000,"publicationDate":"2022-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Empedocles-European Journal for the Philosophy of Communication","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1386/ejpc_00039_1","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"PHILOSOPHY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The aim of this article is to interrogate the use of US rural landscape in the 2020 film Nomadland and its account of contemporary precarity and poverty in the United States. I argue that while the film is ostensibly invested in locating alternative modes of living in the face of neo-liberal marginalization, it ultimately reaffirms neo-liberalism’s core tenet, individualism, through its fascination with what Kenneth Olwig calls the ‘scenic’ landscape. This approach to landscape understands nature as an unchanging ‘stage’ on which a nation’s history is played out and thus ultimately naturalizes nationalism. Thereby, the film reaffirms the myth of the ‘wide open spaces’ of American landscape which has historically been instrumental in the displacement of people excluded from US national identity on the basis of class and race. This can be contrasted with a more interactive, more inclusive approach to landscape which understands landscape as the result of interaction between a community and its environment. Recent US films such as Leave No Trace (2018) identify precisely such an interactive understanding as a basis for potential resistance against the forces of neo-liberalism which perpetuate precarity.
游览风景:游牧之地的社区、民族主义和不稳定(2020)
本文的目的是探讨2020年电影《Nomadland》对美国乡村景观的利用,以及它对美国当代不稳定和贫困的描述。我认为,虽然这部电影表面上是在寻找新自由主义边缘化面前的另一种生活方式,但它最终重申了新自由主义的核心原则,即个人主义,通过它对肯尼斯·奥维格(Kenneth Olwig)所谓的“风景”景观的迷恋。这种景观方法将自然理解为一个不变的“舞台”,在这个舞台上,一个国家的历史得以上演,从而最终使民族主义自然化。因此,这部电影重申了美国景观“广阔开放空间”的神话,这在历史上一直有助于人们在阶级和种族的基础上被排除在美国国家认同之外。这可以与更具互动性、更具包容性的景观方法形成对比,后者将景观理解为社区与其环境之间相互作用的结果。最近的美国电影,如《不留痕迹》(2018),正是将这种互动理解作为对新自由主义力量的潜在抵抗的基础,这种力量使不稳定得以延续。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
6
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信