A Critical Comparison of Machine Learning Classifiers to Predict Match Outcomes in the NFL

Q2 Computer Science
Ryan Beal, T. Norman, S. Ramchurn
{"title":"A Critical Comparison of Machine Learning Classifiers to Predict Match Outcomes in the NFL","authors":"Ryan Beal, T. Norman, S. Ramchurn","doi":"10.2478/ijcss-2020-0009","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract In this paper, we critically evaluate the performance of nine machine learning classification techniques when applied to the match outcome prediction problem presented by American Football. Specifically, we implement and test nine techniques using real-world datasets of 1280 games over 5 seasons from the National Football League (NFL). We test the nine different classifier techniques using a total of 42 features for each team and we find that the best performing algorithms are able to improve one previous published works. The algoriothms achieve an accuracy of between 44.64% for a Guassian Process classifier to 67.53% with a Naïve Bayes classifer. We also test each classifier on a year by year basis and compare our results to those of the bookmakers and other leading academic papers.","PeriodicalId":38466,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Computer Science in Sport","volume":"19 1","pages":"36 - 50"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"5","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Computer Science in Sport","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2478/ijcss-2020-0009","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Computer Science","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

Abstract

Abstract In this paper, we critically evaluate the performance of nine machine learning classification techniques when applied to the match outcome prediction problem presented by American Football. Specifically, we implement and test nine techniques using real-world datasets of 1280 games over 5 seasons from the National Football League (NFL). We test the nine different classifier techniques using a total of 42 features for each team and we find that the best performing algorithms are able to improve one previous published works. The algoriothms achieve an accuracy of between 44.64% for a Guassian Process classifier to 67.53% with a Naïve Bayes classifer. We also test each classifier on a year by year basis and compare our results to those of the bookmakers and other leading academic papers.
预测NFL比赛结果的机器学习分类器的关键比较
摘要在本文中,我们批判性地评估了九种机器学习分类技术在应用于美式足球提出的比赛结果预测问题时的性能。具体来说,我们使用美国国家橄榄球联盟(NFL)5个赛季1280场比赛的真实世界数据集来实现和测试九项技术。我们使用每个团队总共42个特征来测试九种不同的分类器技术,我们发现性能最好的算法能够改进之前发表的一项工作。Guassian过程分类器的算法准确率在44.64%到Naïve Bayes分类器的67.53%之间。我们还逐年测试每个分类器,并将我们的结果与博彩公司和其他领先学术论文的结果进行比较。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
International Journal of Computer Science in Sport
International Journal of Computer Science in Sport Computer Science-Computer Science (all)
CiteScore
2.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
4
审稿时长
12 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信