Exploring the relationship between temperature forecast errors and Earth system variables

Melissa Ruiz-Vásquez, S. O, A. Brenning, R. Koster, G. Balsamo, U. Weber, G. Arduini, A. Bastos, M. Reichstein, R. Orth
{"title":"Exploring the relationship between temperature forecast errors and Earth system variables","authors":"Melissa Ruiz-Vásquez, S. O, A. Brenning, R. Koster, G. Balsamo, U. Weber, G. Arduini, A. Bastos, M. Reichstein, R. Orth","doi":"10.5194/esd-13-1451-2022","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract. Accurate subseasonal weather forecasts, from 2 weeks up to a season, can help reduce costs and impacts related to weather and corresponding extremes. The quality of weather forecasts has improved considerably in recent decades as models represent more details of physical processes, and they benefit from assimilating comprehensive Earth observation data as well as increasing computing power. However, with ever-growing model complexity, it becomes increasingly difficult to pinpoint weaknesses in the forecast models' process representations which is key to improving forecast accuracy. In this study, we use a comprehensive set of observation-based ecological, hydrological, and meteorological variables to study their potential for explaining temperature forecast errors at the weekly timescale. For this purpose, we compute Spearman correlations between each considered variable and the forecast error obtained from the European Centre for Medium-Range Weather Forecasts (ECMWF) subseasonal-to-seasonal (S2S) reforecasts at lead times of 1–6 weeks. This is done across the globe for the time period 2001–2017. The results show that temperature forecast errors globally are most strongly related with climate-related variables such as surface solar radiation and precipitation, which highlights the model's difficulties in accurately capturing the evolution of the climate-related variables during the forecasting period. At the same time, we find particular regions in which other variables are more strongly related to forecast errors. For instance, in central Europe, eastern North America and southeastern Asia, vegetation greenness and soil moisture are relevant, while in western South America and central North America, circulation-related variables such as surface pressure relate more strongly with forecast errors. Overall, the identified relationships between forecast errors and independent Earth observations reveal promising variables on which future forecasting system development could focus by specifically considering related process representations and data assimilation.\n","PeriodicalId":92775,"journal":{"name":"Earth system dynamics : ESD","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-10-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Earth system dynamics : ESD","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5194/esd-13-1451-2022","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract. Accurate subseasonal weather forecasts, from 2 weeks up to a season, can help reduce costs and impacts related to weather and corresponding extremes. The quality of weather forecasts has improved considerably in recent decades as models represent more details of physical processes, and they benefit from assimilating comprehensive Earth observation data as well as increasing computing power. However, with ever-growing model complexity, it becomes increasingly difficult to pinpoint weaknesses in the forecast models' process representations which is key to improving forecast accuracy. In this study, we use a comprehensive set of observation-based ecological, hydrological, and meteorological variables to study their potential for explaining temperature forecast errors at the weekly timescale. For this purpose, we compute Spearman correlations between each considered variable and the forecast error obtained from the European Centre for Medium-Range Weather Forecasts (ECMWF) subseasonal-to-seasonal (S2S) reforecasts at lead times of 1–6 weeks. This is done across the globe for the time period 2001–2017. The results show that temperature forecast errors globally are most strongly related with climate-related variables such as surface solar radiation and precipitation, which highlights the model's difficulties in accurately capturing the evolution of the climate-related variables during the forecasting period. At the same time, we find particular regions in which other variables are more strongly related to forecast errors. For instance, in central Europe, eastern North America and southeastern Asia, vegetation greenness and soil moisture are relevant, while in western South America and central North America, circulation-related variables such as surface pressure relate more strongly with forecast errors. Overall, the identified relationships between forecast errors and independent Earth observations reveal promising variables on which future forecasting system development could focus by specifically considering related process representations and data assimilation.
探讨温度预报误差与地球系统变量的关系
摘要从2周到一个季节,准确的季节性天气预报有助于降低与天气和相应极端天气相关的成本和影响。近几十年来,随着模型代表了物理过程的更多细节,天气预报的质量有了显著提高,它们受益于吸收全面的地球观测数据以及提高计算能力。然而,随着模型复杂性的不断增加,找出预测模型过程表示中的弱点变得越来越困难,这是提高预测准确性的关键。在这项研究中,我们使用了一组基于观测的综合生态、水文和气象变量来研究它们在解释每周时间尺度上的温度预测误差方面的潜力。为此,我们计算了每个考虑的变量与从欧洲中期天气预报中心(ECMWF)获得的预测误差之间的Spearman相关性,该预测误差是在1-6周的交付周期内从季节性到季节性(S2S)重新预测获得的。2001年至2017年期间,全球范围内都在进行这项工作。结果表明,全球温度预测误差与地表太阳辐射和降水等气候相关变量的相关性最强,这凸显了该模型在预测期内难以准确捕捉气候相关变量演变。同时,我们发现其他变量与预测误差的相关性更强的特定区域。例如,在中欧、北美东部和东南亚,植被的绿色度和土壤湿度是相关的,而在南美洲西部和北美中部,与环流相关的变量,如地表压力,与预测误差的相关性更强。总的来说,预测误差和独立地球观测之间已确定的关系揭示了未来预测系统开发可以通过具体考虑相关过程表示和数据同化来关注的有希望的变量。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信