{"title":"Relations Among Poor Sleep, Anxiety and Depression Among the Students of Health Sciences","authors":"Andruškienė Jurgita, Barsevičienė Šarūnė, Mažionienė Asta, Virbalienė Akvilė","doi":"10.1515/arhss-2017-0003","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract The research in the area of health sciences students’ sleep quality and mood disorders is lacking in Lithuania, as well as other European countries. The aim of this study was to compare prevalence of poor sleep, anxiety and depression among the students according to the study programmes and to assess the relations among poor sleep, depression and anxiety. The study sample consisted of 672 Klaipeda State University of Applied Sciences students (95.5% were female), from 18 to 46 years of age. Sleep quality was evaluated by Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index, anxiety by Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale, sociodemographic questions were used. The chi-square test or Fisher exact test was used to estimate association between categorical variables. P-values less than 0.05 were interpreted as statistically significant. Poor sleep was more prevalent among Beauty Therapy (26.4%, 95% CI 22.2-30.56) and Nursing (21.3%, 95% CI 17.42 – 25.17) students, as compared with persons studying in Oral Health programmes (14.8%, 95% CI 11.46 – 18.17), p<0.05. Depression mean score was higher in Beauty Therapy students (4.76), as compared to Oral Health (3.69) students, p<0.05. Beauty Therapy (9.99) or Physiotherapy students (8.24) had higher anxiety mean score, as compared to Oral Health students (7.14), p<0.05. Anxiety mean score was significantly higher (8.45) among the ones with disturbed sleep, as compared to normally sleeping students (5.86), p<0.001. Depression mean score (4.77) was higher among the students having disturbed sleep, as compared to the students which sleep was not disturbed (2.87), p<0.001. Poor sleep and anxiety were more prevalent among the students aged 20 years and older as compared to the students, aged 18 and 19 years. Second and third year students more often had poor sleep or anxiety as compared to the first-year students. Poor sleep and anxiety were more common among Beauty Therapy and Physiotherapy students than among Oral Health Students. Among the students who slept poorly, symptoms of anxiety and depression were statistically significantly more frequent than those students whose sleep was not disturbed. Depression and anxiety mean scores were statistically significantly higher among the students who had poor sleep, as compared to the ones who had normal sleep, in all age and year of studying groups.","PeriodicalId":31082,"journal":{"name":"Applied Research in Health and Social Sciences Interface and Interaction","volume":"14 1","pages":"26 - 38"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1515/arhss-2017-0003","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Applied Research in Health and Social Sciences Interface and Interaction","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1515/arhss-2017-0003","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1
Abstract
Abstract The research in the area of health sciences students’ sleep quality and mood disorders is lacking in Lithuania, as well as other European countries. The aim of this study was to compare prevalence of poor sleep, anxiety and depression among the students according to the study programmes and to assess the relations among poor sleep, depression and anxiety. The study sample consisted of 672 Klaipeda State University of Applied Sciences students (95.5% were female), from 18 to 46 years of age. Sleep quality was evaluated by Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index, anxiety by Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale, sociodemographic questions were used. The chi-square test or Fisher exact test was used to estimate association between categorical variables. P-values less than 0.05 were interpreted as statistically significant. Poor sleep was more prevalent among Beauty Therapy (26.4%, 95% CI 22.2-30.56) and Nursing (21.3%, 95% CI 17.42 – 25.17) students, as compared with persons studying in Oral Health programmes (14.8%, 95% CI 11.46 – 18.17), p<0.05. Depression mean score was higher in Beauty Therapy students (4.76), as compared to Oral Health (3.69) students, p<0.05. Beauty Therapy (9.99) or Physiotherapy students (8.24) had higher anxiety mean score, as compared to Oral Health students (7.14), p<0.05. Anxiety mean score was significantly higher (8.45) among the ones with disturbed sleep, as compared to normally sleeping students (5.86), p<0.001. Depression mean score (4.77) was higher among the students having disturbed sleep, as compared to the students which sleep was not disturbed (2.87), p<0.001. Poor sleep and anxiety were more prevalent among the students aged 20 years and older as compared to the students, aged 18 and 19 years. Second and third year students more often had poor sleep or anxiety as compared to the first-year students. Poor sleep and anxiety were more common among Beauty Therapy and Physiotherapy students than among Oral Health Students. Among the students who slept poorly, symptoms of anxiety and depression were statistically significantly more frequent than those students whose sleep was not disturbed. Depression and anxiety mean scores were statistically significantly higher among the students who had poor sleep, as compared to the ones who had normal sleep, in all age and year of studying groups.
立陶宛以及其他欧洲国家在健康科学学生睡眠质量和情绪障碍方面的研究较为缺乏。本研究的目的是比较不同学习计划的学生中睡眠质量差、焦虑和抑郁的患病率,并评估睡眠质量差、抑郁和焦虑之间的关系。研究样本包括672名克莱佩达国立应用科学大学的学生(95.5%为女性),年龄从18岁到46岁。采用匹兹堡睡眠质量指数评估睡眠质量,采用医院焦虑抑郁量表评估焦虑程度,采用社会人口学问卷。使用卡方检验或Fisher精确检验来估计分类变量之间的相关性。p值小于0.05被解释为具有统计学意义。与口腔保健专业的学生(14.8%,95% CI 11.46 - 18.17)相比,美容治疗专业的学生(26.4%,95% CI 22.2-30.56)和护理专业的学生(21.3%,95% CI 17.42 - 25.17)的睡眠质量较差,p<0.05。美容治疗组抑郁平均分(4.76)高于口腔健康组(3.69),差异有统计学意义(p<0.05)。美容治疗组(9.99)和物理治疗组(8.24)焦虑平均得分高于口腔健康组(7.14),差异有统计学意义(p<0.05)。睡眠障碍学生焦虑平均分(8.45分)显著高于睡眠正常学生(5.86分),差异有统计学意义(p<0.001)。睡眠受到干扰的学生抑郁平均得分(4.77)高于睡眠未受到干扰的学生(2.87),p<0.001。与18岁和19岁的学生相比,20岁及以上的学生睡眠质量差和焦虑更为普遍。与一年级学生相比,二年级和三年级的学生更经常出现睡眠质量差或焦虑的情况。睡眠不足和焦虑在美容治疗和物理治疗专业的学生中比在口腔健康专业的学生中更常见。在睡眠不好的学生中,焦虑和抑郁的症状比那些睡眠不受干扰的学生更频繁。在所有年龄和年份的学习小组中,睡眠不好的学生的抑郁和焦虑平均得分明显高于睡眠正常的学生。