Modal frequencies of bridges from GNSS (GPS) monitoring data: Experimental, statistical evidence

Pub Date : 2021-06-11 DOI:10.3233/BRS-210184
S. Stiros, F. Moschas, P. Triantafyllidis
{"title":"Modal frequencies of bridges from GNSS (GPS) monitoring data: Experimental, statistical evidence","authors":"S. Stiros, F. Moschas, P. Triantafyllidis","doi":"10.3233/BRS-210184","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"GNSS technology (known especially for GPS satellites) for measurement of deflections has proved very efficient and useful in bridge structural monitoring, even for short stiff bridges, especially after the advent of 100 Hz GNSS sensors. Mode computation from dynamic deflections has been proposed as one of the applications of this technology. Apart from formal modal analyses with GNSS input, and from spectral analysis of controlled free attenuating oscillations, it has been argued that simple spectra of deflections can define more than one modal frequencies. To test this scenario, we analyzed 21 controlled excitation events from a certain bridge monitoring survey, focusing on lateral and vertical deflections, recorded both by GNSS and an accelerometer. These events contain a transient and a following oscillation, and they are preceded and followed by intervals of quiescence and ambient vibrations. Spectra for each event, for the lateral and the vertical axis of the bridge, and for and each instrument (GNSS, accelerometer) were computed, normalized to their maximum value, and printed one over the other, in order to produce a single composite spectrum for each of the four sets. In these four sets, there was also marked the true value of modal frequency, derived from free attenuating oscillations. It was found that for high SNR (signal-to-noise ratio) deflections, spectral peaks in both acceleration and displacement spectra differ by up to 0.3 Hz from the true value. For low SNR, defections spectra do not match the true frequency, but acceleration spectra provide a low-precision estimate of the true frequency. This is because various excitation effects (traffic, wind etc.) contribute with numerous peaks in a wide range of frequencies. Reliable estimates of modal frequencies can hence be derived from deflections spectra only if excitation frequencies (mostly traffic and wind) can be filtered along with most measurement noise, on the basis of additional data.","PeriodicalId":0,"journal":{"name":"","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2021-06-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.3233/BRS-210184","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3233/BRS-210184","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

GNSS technology (known especially for GPS satellites) for measurement of deflections has proved very efficient and useful in bridge structural monitoring, even for short stiff bridges, especially after the advent of 100 Hz GNSS sensors. Mode computation from dynamic deflections has been proposed as one of the applications of this technology. Apart from formal modal analyses with GNSS input, and from spectral analysis of controlled free attenuating oscillations, it has been argued that simple spectra of deflections can define more than one modal frequencies. To test this scenario, we analyzed 21 controlled excitation events from a certain bridge monitoring survey, focusing on lateral and vertical deflections, recorded both by GNSS and an accelerometer. These events contain a transient and a following oscillation, and they are preceded and followed by intervals of quiescence and ambient vibrations. Spectra for each event, for the lateral and the vertical axis of the bridge, and for and each instrument (GNSS, accelerometer) were computed, normalized to their maximum value, and printed one over the other, in order to produce a single composite spectrum for each of the four sets. In these four sets, there was also marked the true value of modal frequency, derived from free attenuating oscillations. It was found that for high SNR (signal-to-noise ratio) deflections, spectral peaks in both acceleration and displacement spectra differ by up to 0.3 Hz from the true value. For low SNR, defections spectra do not match the true frequency, but acceleration spectra provide a low-precision estimate of the true frequency. This is because various excitation effects (traffic, wind etc.) contribute with numerous peaks in a wide range of frequencies. Reliable estimates of modal frequencies can hence be derived from deflections spectra only if excitation frequencies (mostly traffic and wind) can be filtered along with most measurement noise, on the basis of additional data.
分享
查看原文
全球导航卫星系统(GPS)监测数据中桥梁的模态频率:实验统计证据
用于测量挠度的GNSS技术(特别是GPS卫星)已被证明在桥梁结构监测中非常有效和有用,即使是短刚性桥梁,特别是在100 Hz GNSS传感器出现之后。作为该技术的应用之一,提出了基于动态挠度的模态计算。除了GNSS输入的正式模态分析和受控自由衰减振荡的频谱分析外,有人认为,简单的偏转频谱可以定义多个模态频率。为了测试这一场景,我们分析了来自某桥梁监测调查的21个受控激励事件,重点关注GNSS和加速度计记录的横向和垂直偏转。这些事件包含一个瞬态振荡和一个后续振荡,它们之前和之后都是静止和环境振动的间隔。计算每个事件的光谱,桥的横向和垂直轴的光谱,以及每个仪器(GNSS,加速度计)的光谱,归一化到最大值,然后打印出来,以便为四组中的每一组生成单一的复合光谱。在这四组中,还标记了模态频率的真实值,由自由衰减振荡得出。研究发现,对于高信噪比(信噪比)偏转,加速度和位移谱的谱峰与真实值相差0.3 Hz。对于低信噪比,缺陷谱与真实频率不匹配,而加速度谱提供了对真实频率的低精度估计。这是因为各种激励效应(交通、风等)在广泛的频率范围内产生了许多峰值。因此,只有在附加数据的基础上滤除激励频率(主要是交通和风)以及大多数测量噪声的情况下,才能从偏转谱中得出模态频率的可靠估计。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信