The new revolving door

M. Vandenbergh, J. Gilligan, Haley Feuerman
{"title":"The new revolving door","authors":"M. Vandenbergh, J. Gilligan, Haley Feuerman","doi":"10.2139/SSRN.3570889","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This Article demonstrates that a new revolving door is emerging between environmental advocacy groups and the private sector. Since the birth of the modern regulatory state, scholars have raised concerns that the revolving door between corporations and government agencies could induce government officials to pursue corporate interests rather than the public interest. The legal and political science literatures have identified several benefits that may arise from the revolving door, but the thrust of the scholarship to date has emphasized the potential harms. Using several data sources, we demonstrate that as the private sector has begun to play an increasing role in environmental governance in recent years, a new revolving door has emerged between environmental advocacy groups and corporations, institutional investment firms and private equity firms. We demonstrate that this new revolving door is surprisingly common, and we examine the implications for the future of public and private environmental governance. Although this new revolving door creates new risks, we argue that it may turn the central concern about the revolving door on its head: The movement of environmental advocates into corporate management positions may play the role of greening corporate behavior and accelerating the development of private environmental initiatives. We focus on the movement of employees in the environmental area, a new green revolving door, but we suggest that the new revolving door also may be emerging in the labor, health and safety, and other regulatory areas.","PeriodicalId":80897,"journal":{"name":"Case Western Reserve law review","volume":"70 1","pages":"1121"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-04-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Case Western Reserve law review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/SSRN.3570889","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

This Article demonstrates that a new revolving door is emerging between environmental advocacy groups and the private sector. Since the birth of the modern regulatory state, scholars have raised concerns that the revolving door between corporations and government agencies could induce government officials to pursue corporate interests rather than the public interest. The legal and political science literatures have identified several benefits that may arise from the revolving door, but the thrust of the scholarship to date has emphasized the potential harms. Using several data sources, we demonstrate that as the private sector has begun to play an increasing role in environmental governance in recent years, a new revolving door has emerged between environmental advocacy groups and corporations, institutional investment firms and private equity firms. We demonstrate that this new revolving door is surprisingly common, and we examine the implications for the future of public and private environmental governance. Although this new revolving door creates new risks, we argue that it may turn the central concern about the revolving door on its head: The movement of environmental advocates into corporate management positions may play the role of greening corporate behavior and accelerating the development of private environmental initiatives. We focus on the movement of employees in the environmental area, a new green revolving door, but we suggest that the new revolving door also may be emerging in the labor, health and safety, and other regulatory areas.
新的旋转门
这篇文章表明,环境倡导团体和私营部门之间正在出现一扇新的旋转门。自现代监管国家诞生以来,学者们一直担心,企业和政府机构之间的旋转门可能会促使政府官员追求企业利益,而不是公共利益。法律和政治学文献已经确定了旋转门可能带来的一些好处,但迄今为止学术界的主旨强调了潜在的危害。通过使用几个数据来源,我们表明,随着私营部门近年来开始在环境治理中发挥越来越大的作用,环境倡导团体与公司、机构投资公司和私募股权公司之间出现了一扇新的旋转门。我们证明,这种新的旋转门非常常见,我们研究了它对公共和私人环境治理未来的影响。尽管这种新的旋转门带来了新的风险,但我们认为,它可能会颠覆人们对旋转门的核心关注:环境倡导者进入企业管理职位可能会起到绿化企业行为和加速私人环境倡议发展的作用。我们关注员工在环境领域的流动,一种新的绿色旋转门,但我们建议,新的旋转门也可能出现在劳动、健康和安全以及其他监管领域。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书