A Case of Parvovirus B19 Infection Diagnosed as COVID-19 due to False PCR Positivity

IF 0.3 Q3 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
G. Şenol, Ferhat Demirci
{"title":"A Case of Parvovirus B19 Infection Diagnosed as COVID-19 due to False PCR Positivity","authors":"G. Şenol, Ferhat Demirci","doi":"10.36519/kd.2022.3872","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Although PCR is the most reliable test for the diagnosis of Covid-19 infection, false negative and positive results can also occur. Our case is a 32-year-old laboratory technician who applied with headache and malaise and her first Covid-19 PCR test was negative. It was repeated two days later, and the result was positive. Additional tests were also performed, and Parvovirus IgM antibody was also found to be positive. Four weeks later, while Covid-19 IgM and IgG test results were negative, the Parvovirus B19 IgG and IgM test results were positive. The Covid-19 PCR test was evaluated as false positive. We aimed to emphasize the need to consider other viral infections in the differential diagnosis even under pandemic conditions.","PeriodicalId":44309,"journal":{"name":"Klimik Journal","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.3000,"publicationDate":"2022-03-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Klimik Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.36519/kd.2022.3872","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Although PCR is the most reliable test for the diagnosis of Covid-19 infection, false negative and positive results can also occur. Our case is a 32-year-old laboratory technician who applied with headache and malaise and her first Covid-19 PCR test was negative. It was repeated two days later, and the result was positive. Additional tests were also performed, and Parvovirus IgM antibody was also found to be positive. Four weeks later, while Covid-19 IgM and IgG test results were negative, the Parvovirus B19 IgG and IgM test results were positive. The Covid-19 PCR test was evaluated as false positive. We aimed to emphasize the need to consider other viral infections in the differential diagnosis even under pandemic conditions.
假PCR阳性诊断为新冠肺炎的细小病毒B19感染1例
尽管PCR是诊断新冠肺炎感染最可靠的检测方法,但也可能出现假阴性和假阳性结果。我们的病例是一名32岁的实验室技术人员,她因头痛和不适进行了应用,她的第一次新冠肺炎PCR检测呈阴性。两天后再次检测,结果呈阳性。还进行了额外的测试,细小病毒IgM抗体也被发现呈阳性。四周后,新冠肺炎IgM和IgG检测结果呈阴性,但细小病毒B19 IgG和IgM检测结果呈阳性。新冠肺炎PCR检测被评估为假阳性。我们旨在强调,即使在大流行条件下,也需要在鉴别诊断中考虑其他病毒感染。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Klimik Journal
Klimik Journal MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL-
CiteScore
0.60
自引率
33.30%
发文量
39
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信