Majority and Minority Subgroup Argumentation Messages

IF 16.4 1区 化学 Q1 CHEMISTRY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY
S. Beck
{"title":"Majority and Minority Subgroup Argumentation Messages","authors":"S. Beck","doi":"10.1080/08934215.2019.1603317","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Past research suggests that majority and minority subgroups influence group members in different ways. This exploratory study examined the communication behind such influence, specifically the argumentation messages majority and minority subgroup members use in decision-making. Using an argumentation coding scheme to analyze city commission meetings, communicative differences were found in relation to the two subgroups. Specifically, majority members focused on coalition formation messages while minority members focused on substantive argumentation. In general, the results provide an explanatory communicative foundation for the cognitive outcomes found in previous majority/minority influence literature.","PeriodicalId":1,"journal":{"name":"Accounts of Chemical Research","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":16.4000,"publicationDate":"2019-04-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/08934215.2019.1603317","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Accounts of Chemical Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/08934215.2019.1603317","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"化学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CHEMISTRY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

Past research suggests that majority and minority subgroups influence group members in different ways. This exploratory study examined the communication behind such influence, specifically the argumentation messages majority and minority subgroup members use in decision-making. Using an argumentation coding scheme to analyze city commission meetings, communicative differences were found in relation to the two subgroups. Specifically, majority members focused on coalition formation messages while minority members focused on substantive argumentation. In general, the results provide an explanatory communicative foundation for the cognitive outcomes found in previous majority/minority influence literature.
多数和少数子群体论证信息
过去的研究表明,多数群体和少数群体以不同的方式影响群体成员。本探索性研究考察了这种影响背后的沟通,特别是多数和少数子群体成员在决策中使用的论证信息。使用论证编码方案来分析城市委员会会议,发现两个子群体之间的沟通差异。具体而言,多数成员侧重于联盟形成信息,而少数成员侧重于实质性论证。总体而言,研究结果为之前多数/少数影响文献中发现的认知结果提供了解释性交际基础。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Accounts of Chemical Research
Accounts of Chemical Research 化学-化学综合
CiteScore
31.40
自引率
1.10%
发文量
312
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: Accounts of Chemical Research presents short, concise and critical articles offering easy-to-read overviews of basic research and applications in all areas of chemistry and biochemistry. These short reviews focus on research from the author’s own laboratory and are designed to teach the reader about a research project. In addition, Accounts of Chemical Research publishes commentaries that give an informed opinion on a current research problem. Special Issues online are devoted to a single topic of unusual activity and significance. Accounts of Chemical Research replaces the traditional article abstract with an article "Conspectus." These entries synopsize the research affording the reader a closer look at the content and significance of an article. Through this provision of a more detailed description of the article contents, the Conspectus enhances the article's discoverability by search engines and the exposure for the research.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信