Interactive e-learning course versus virtual traditional teaching on fetal motility, a cohort comparison of medical students

J. Tjon, A. Ledebt, I. Linskens, B. J. van der Knoop, H. Jarodzka, J. de Vries
{"title":"Interactive e-learning course versus virtual traditional teaching on fetal motility, a cohort comparison of medical students","authors":"J. Tjon, A. Ledebt, I. Linskens, B. J. van der Knoop, H. Jarodzka, J. de Vries","doi":"10.12688/mep.19562.1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Ultrasound examination is an important application in obstetrics. Fetal motor assessment can help to discriminate severe diseases, such as those underlying abnormal fetal joint position. However, standardized training is lacking. It was investigated whether virtual traditional teaching (TT) initiated by the coronavirus 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic gave equal outcome, compared to the prior blended teaching (BT) course on fetal motility. Methods: In total 96 medical students were included, 51 underwent BT versus 45 TT. BT underwent live supervised interactive e-learning and TT plenary virtual lecture. Both groups made the same individual assignments. The first assignment evaluated course knowledge in four video fragments on single specific movement patterns (SMPs), the second assignment consisted of three fragments with various SMPs, students were asked to score differentiation and qualitative performance. Results: BT and TT showed equally high correct answers on four individual SMPs. The second assignment revealed that BT and TT scored similarly in differentiation of SMPs. Two fetuses with normal motility were equally well scored in half of the items, BT scored speed and amplitude better, TT scored better in speed (other fetus) and overall conclusion. The one fetus with abnormal movements was scored by BT and TT similarly, 75% of both groups scored the fetus as moving suspect or abnormal. Conclusions: Evaluation of medical students’ motor assessment skills after BT and TT revealed a nearly equally high yield of the courses in distinguishing SMPs and similar judgement of aspects and overall qualitative performance.","PeriodicalId":74136,"journal":{"name":"MedEdPublish (2016)","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-05-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"MedEdPublish (2016)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.12688/mep.19562.1","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Ultrasound examination is an important application in obstetrics. Fetal motor assessment can help to discriminate severe diseases, such as those underlying abnormal fetal joint position. However, standardized training is lacking. It was investigated whether virtual traditional teaching (TT) initiated by the coronavirus 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic gave equal outcome, compared to the prior blended teaching (BT) course on fetal motility. Methods: In total 96 medical students were included, 51 underwent BT versus 45 TT. BT underwent live supervised interactive e-learning and TT plenary virtual lecture. Both groups made the same individual assignments. The first assignment evaluated course knowledge in four video fragments on single specific movement patterns (SMPs), the second assignment consisted of three fragments with various SMPs, students were asked to score differentiation and qualitative performance. Results: BT and TT showed equally high correct answers on four individual SMPs. The second assignment revealed that BT and TT scored similarly in differentiation of SMPs. Two fetuses with normal motility were equally well scored in half of the items, BT scored speed and amplitude better, TT scored better in speed (other fetus) and overall conclusion. The one fetus with abnormal movements was scored by BT and TT similarly, 75% of both groups scored the fetus as moving suspect or abnormal. Conclusions: Evaluation of medical students’ motor assessment skills after BT and TT revealed a nearly equally high yield of the courses in distinguishing SMPs and similar judgement of aspects and overall qualitative performance.
交互式电子学习课程与虚拟传统胎儿运动教学——医学生的队列比较
背景:超声检查是产科的一项重要应用。胎儿运动评估有助于区分严重疾病,例如潜在的胎儿关节位置异常。然而,缺乏标准化培训。调查了2019冠状病毒(新冠肺炎)大流行引发的虚拟传统教学(TT)与之前关于胎儿运动的混合教学(BT)课程相比是否产生了相同的结果。方法:在总共96名医学生中,51名接受了BT,而45名接受了TT。BT接受了现场监督的交互式电子学习和TT全体虚拟讲座。两组都做了相同的个人作业。第一项作业评估了四个视频片段中关于单一特定运动模式(SMPs)的课程知识,第二项作业由三个不同SMPs的片段组成,要求学生对差异化和定性表现进行评分。结果:BT和TT在四个SMPs上显示出同样高的正确答案。第二项任务显示,BT和TT在SMPs的分化中得分相似。两个运动正常的胎儿在一半项目中得分相同,BT在速度和幅度方面得分更好,TT在速度(其他胎儿)和总体结论方面得分更好。BT和TT对一个运动异常的胎儿进行了类似的评分,两组中75%的人将胎儿评分为运动可疑或异常。结论:对BT和TT后医学生运动评估技能的评估显示,在区分SMPs以及对各方面和整体定性表现的相似判断方面,课程的产出几乎同样高。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
2 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信