Comparison of Anxiety levels among Medical & Engineering Students

Sarfaraz Ahmed, Kiran Abdullah, Abdul Ghani
{"title":"Comparison of Anxiety levels among Medical & Engineering Students","authors":"Sarfaraz Ahmed, Kiran Abdullah, Abdul Ghani","doi":"10.29052/2412-3188.v6.i1.2019.35-40","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Medical and Engineering educational programs are widespread and difficult, which frequently leads to anxiety. The basic objective of this study was to compare the anxiety levels among medical & engineering students. \nMethodology: A cross sectional study was carried out among students of different medical & engineering universities of Karachi from August 2018 to February 2019. A simple stratified sampling technique was used, 250 medical students and 150 engineering students including both genders participated in the study. A self-administered questionnaire consisting of socio demographic profile, details on anxiety episodes, causes of anxiety, physical symptoms and ways to overcome anxiety was utilized in this study. \nResults: Findings showed that among 250 medical students 160(64%) had anxiety out of which 49% were moderate and 15% were in severe anxiety.  On the other hand, 54 (36%) engineering students had anxiety. Social interactions (45%) and university/work (35%) were the prime cause of anxiety as indicated by study population. \nConclusion: Significant differences were shown between medical and engineering students. Our study suggests that medical students experience more anxiety than engineering students.","PeriodicalId":34185,"journal":{"name":"Annals of Psychophysiology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-10-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of Psychophysiology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.29052/2412-3188.v6.i1.2019.35-40","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Medical and Engineering educational programs are widespread and difficult, which frequently leads to anxiety. The basic objective of this study was to compare the anxiety levels among medical & engineering students. Methodology: A cross sectional study was carried out among students of different medical & engineering universities of Karachi from August 2018 to February 2019. A simple stratified sampling technique was used, 250 medical students and 150 engineering students including both genders participated in the study. A self-administered questionnaire consisting of socio demographic profile, details on anxiety episodes, causes of anxiety, physical symptoms and ways to overcome anxiety was utilized in this study. Results: Findings showed that among 250 medical students 160(64%) had anxiety out of which 49% were moderate and 15% were in severe anxiety.  On the other hand, 54 (36%) engineering students had anxiety. Social interactions (45%) and university/work (35%) were the prime cause of anxiety as indicated by study population. Conclusion: Significant differences were shown between medical and engineering students. Our study suggests that medical students experience more anxiety than engineering students.
医学与工程专业学生焦虑水平的比较
背景:医学和工程教育项目广泛而困难,经常导致焦虑。本研究的基本目的是比较医学与工程专业学生的焦虑水平。方法:2018年8月至2019年2月,在卡拉奇不同医学和工程大学的学生中进行了一项横断面研究。采用简单的分层抽样技术,250名医学生和150名工程生参与了这项研究,包括男女。本研究采用了一份自填问卷,包括社会人口概况、焦虑发作细节、焦虑原因、身体症状和克服焦虑的方法。结果:在250名医学生中,160人(64%)存在焦虑,其中49%为中度焦虑,15%为重度焦虑。另一方面,54名(36%)工科学生存在焦虑。研究人群表明,社交(45%)和大学/工作(35%)是焦虑的主要原因。结论:医学生与工科学生之间存在显著差异。我们的研究表明,医科学生比工科学生经历更多的焦虑。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
8
审稿时长
12 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信