Probiotics in Industrial Poultry Farming

Q3 Veterinary
O. Smolovskaya, V. Pleshkov, T. Zubova, L. Bormina
{"title":"Probiotics in Industrial Poultry Farming","authors":"O. Smolovskaya, V. Pleshkov, T. Zubova, L. Bormina","doi":"10.3844/ajavsp.2023.1.8","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":": In the conditions of industrial production, the problem of growing poultry with increased resistance to various diseases is relevant because the birds are exposed to various stress conditions. Traditionally, disease prevention is carried out through the use of vaccines, chemical pharmaceuticals, and antibiotics. The global use of therapeutic drugs contributes to the emergence of resistant strains of microorganisms and a decrease in the effectiveness of treatment; some of them have an immunosuppressive effect. The article presents the results of research on the effect of the preparation \" Lactobacillus plantarum , Enterococcus faecalis , and Propionibacterium freudenreichii ssp.\" on the immune status, growth rate, and safety of experimental stock in broiler chickens. Studies were carried out on 150 one-day-old Ross-308 broiler chicks that were divided into three groups of 50 birds. The control Group (G3) was fed a standard ration based on the phases of growth, while the experimental Groups (G1 and G2) were supplemented with probiotics at different doses in the feed. The experiment was designed to last for 41 days. In the 3 rd week, the average live weights of G1 and G2 broiler chickens exceeded those of G3 by 5.5 and 4.1%, respectively. In the 6 th week, G1 and G2 broiler chicks had average live weights that exceeded those of G3 by 7.7 and 7.4%, respectively. The survival rates of the flocks in G1 and G2 were 4 and 2% higher, respectively than in G3. The average titers for Newcastle Disease and infectious bronchitis viruses in G1 were 314.9 and 53.5% higher, respectively than in G3, while in G2 they were 3.7 and 21.8% lower, respectively. For infectious bursal disease, G1 and G2 exceeded the control group by 74.2 and 6.4%, respectively. The meat yield of G1 and G2 was higher at 17.2 and 9.1%, respectively, compared to G3. Probiotics have shown many beneficial properties, including the ability to improve immunity, gut structure, and gut barrier function in broilers. These factors can improve digestion and absorption, ultimately increasing the quality and safety of products.","PeriodicalId":7561,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Animal and Veterinary Sciences","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American Journal of Animal and Veterinary Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3844/ajavsp.2023.1.8","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Veterinary","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

: In the conditions of industrial production, the problem of growing poultry with increased resistance to various diseases is relevant because the birds are exposed to various stress conditions. Traditionally, disease prevention is carried out through the use of vaccines, chemical pharmaceuticals, and antibiotics. The global use of therapeutic drugs contributes to the emergence of resistant strains of microorganisms and a decrease in the effectiveness of treatment; some of them have an immunosuppressive effect. The article presents the results of research on the effect of the preparation " Lactobacillus plantarum , Enterococcus faecalis , and Propionibacterium freudenreichii ssp." on the immune status, growth rate, and safety of experimental stock in broiler chickens. Studies were carried out on 150 one-day-old Ross-308 broiler chicks that were divided into three groups of 50 birds. The control Group (G3) was fed a standard ration based on the phases of growth, while the experimental Groups (G1 and G2) were supplemented with probiotics at different doses in the feed. The experiment was designed to last for 41 days. In the 3 rd week, the average live weights of G1 and G2 broiler chickens exceeded those of G3 by 5.5 and 4.1%, respectively. In the 6 th week, G1 and G2 broiler chicks had average live weights that exceeded those of G3 by 7.7 and 7.4%, respectively. The survival rates of the flocks in G1 and G2 were 4 and 2% higher, respectively than in G3. The average titers for Newcastle Disease and infectious bronchitis viruses in G1 were 314.9 and 53.5% higher, respectively than in G3, while in G2 they were 3.7 and 21.8% lower, respectively. For infectious bursal disease, G1 and G2 exceeded the control group by 74.2 and 6.4%, respectively. The meat yield of G1 and G2 was higher at 17.2 and 9.1%, respectively, compared to G3. Probiotics have shown many beneficial properties, including the ability to improve immunity, gut structure, and gut barrier function in broilers. These factors can improve digestion and absorption, ultimately increasing the quality and safety of products.
益生菌在工业化家禽养殖中的应用
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
29
期刊介绍: American Journal of Animal and Veterinary Sciences, a quarterly, peer reviewed publication and is dedicated for publication of research articles in the field of biology of animals and with the scientific understanding of how animals work: from the physiology and biochemistry of tissues and major organ systems down to the structure and function of bio molecules and cells; particular emphasis would given to the studies of growth, reproduction, nutrition and lactation of farm and companion animals and how these processes may be optimized to improve animal re- productivity, health and welfare. Articles in support areas, such as genetics, soils, agricultural economics and marketing, legal aspects and the environment also are encouraged. AJAVS is an important source of researcher to study articles on protection of animal production practices, herd health and monitoring the spread of disease and prevention in both domestic and wild animals.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信