{"title":"Drought and the South African Imagination: Selected Readings","authors":"T. Voss","doi":"10.4314/EIA.V46I1.1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Both the work of a number of poets and novelists and the popular discourse of the late twentieth and early twenty-first centuries epitomise the fascination which drought continues to hold for the South African imagination. They also embody the environmental humanities principle that “environment” is inseparable from “society.” If, as has recently been argued, our literature is continuous with San orature, then our memory of drought covers millennia. A selective account of texts from the 1820s to the early twentieth century illustrates this continuity, as well as the complexity and controversy of the issue. In conclusion, 1933 was in popular memory the year of a “great drought,” anticipated by Francis Carey Slater and responded to by W. A. Kingon, C. M. van den Heever and, most powerfully, Eugene Marais. Keywords : Drought, South African literature, Eugene Marais","PeriodicalId":41428,"journal":{"name":"ENGLISH IN AFRICA","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2019-07-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ENGLISH IN AFRICA","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4314/EIA.V46I1.1","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1
Abstract
Both the work of a number of poets and novelists and the popular discourse of the late twentieth and early twenty-first centuries epitomise the fascination which drought continues to hold for the South African imagination. They also embody the environmental humanities principle that “environment” is inseparable from “society.” If, as has recently been argued, our literature is continuous with San orature, then our memory of drought covers millennia. A selective account of texts from the 1820s to the early twentieth century illustrates this continuity, as well as the complexity and controversy of the issue. In conclusion, 1933 was in popular memory the year of a “great drought,” anticipated by Francis Carey Slater and responded to by W. A. Kingon, C. M. van den Heever and, most powerfully, Eugene Marais. Keywords : Drought, South African literature, Eugene Marais
许多诗人和小说家的作品以及20世纪末和21世纪初的流行话语都集中体现了干旱对南非想象力的吸引力。它们也体现了“环境”与“社会”不可分割的环境人文原则。如果,就像最近争论的那样,我们的文学与自然是连续的,那么我们对干旱的记忆涵盖了几千年。从19世纪20年代到20世纪初的精选文本说明了这种连续性,以及这个问题的复杂性和争议性。总之,在人们的记忆中,1933年是“大干旱”的一年,弗朗西斯·凯里·斯莱特(Francis Carey Slater)预测到了这一点,w·a·金(W. a . Kingon)、C. M.范登·希弗(C. M. van den Heever)做出了回应,而最有力的是尤金·玛莱(Eugene Marais)。关键词:干旱,南非文学,尤金·玛莱