Examining the impact of marketing techniques on the prescription behavior of physicians with ethical ideology as a moderator

IF 1.2 Q4 HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES
Tanzeela Aqif, Sana Mumtaz
{"title":"Examining the impact of marketing techniques on the prescription behavior of physicians with ethical ideology as a moderator","authors":"Tanzeela Aqif, Sana Mumtaz","doi":"10.1108/ijphm-01-2021-0009","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\nPurpose\nThis research paper aims to investigate the impact of pharmaceutical marketing on the prescription behavior of physicians. It further examines whether the use of various promotional techniques including advertisements, sales promotions, personal selling and direct marketing by pharmaceutical companies influences the prescription behavior of doctors. Based on the increasing ethical concerns regarding the promotion of specific drugs for personal gains, the research also investigated the moderating role of ethical ideology in the above relationship.\n\n\nDesign/methodology/approach\nTo accomplish the research goals, quantitative research methods were used. Using the online questionnaire, data were collected from 93 doctors working in government and private hospitals in Pakistan, and structural equation modeling technique was used to analyze the impact of pharmaceutical marketing techniques on the prescription decisions of physicians.\n\n\nFindings\nThe findings suggested that marketing strategies of pharmaceutical companies positively influences the prescription behavior of doctors. Further, physicians having weak ethical standards are likely to be strongly influenced by the marketing and promotional practices of companies.\n\n\nPractical implications\nThe research is pivotal in understanding the perspective of doctors and the ethical considerations that need to be addressed while devising the marketing campaigns by pharmaceutical companies. Further, these findings provide important implications regarding the essential linkage between ethical values and the development of right marketing tools.\n\n\nOriginality/value\nTo the best of the authors’ knowledge, this research is one of the first few to empirically develop and test the role of moral values followed by physicians when they take prescription decisions. Based on the findings, future researchers are encouraged to further investigate the need of setting boundaries for pharmaceutical companies and restricting their usage regarding the promotional tactics.\n","PeriodicalId":51798,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Pharmaceutical and Healthcare Marketing","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Pharmaceutical and Healthcare Marketing","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/ijphm-01-2021-0009","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Purpose This research paper aims to investigate the impact of pharmaceutical marketing on the prescription behavior of physicians. It further examines whether the use of various promotional techniques including advertisements, sales promotions, personal selling and direct marketing by pharmaceutical companies influences the prescription behavior of doctors. Based on the increasing ethical concerns regarding the promotion of specific drugs for personal gains, the research also investigated the moderating role of ethical ideology in the above relationship. Design/methodology/approach To accomplish the research goals, quantitative research methods were used. Using the online questionnaire, data were collected from 93 doctors working in government and private hospitals in Pakistan, and structural equation modeling technique was used to analyze the impact of pharmaceutical marketing techniques on the prescription decisions of physicians. Findings The findings suggested that marketing strategies of pharmaceutical companies positively influences the prescription behavior of doctors. Further, physicians having weak ethical standards are likely to be strongly influenced by the marketing and promotional practices of companies. Practical implications The research is pivotal in understanding the perspective of doctors and the ethical considerations that need to be addressed while devising the marketing campaigns by pharmaceutical companies. Further, these findings provide important implications regarding the essential linkage between ethical values and the development of right marketing tools. Originality/value To the best of the authors’ knowledge, this research is one of the first few to empirically develop and test the role of moral values followed by physicians when they take prescription decisions. Based on the findings, future researchers are encouraged to further investigate the need of setting boundaries for pharmaceutical companies and restricting their usage regarding the promotional tactics.
以伦理意识为调节因子考察营销技巧对医师处方行为的影响
目的本研究旨在探讨药品营销对医师处方行为的影响。它进一步研究了制药公司使用各种促销手段,包括广告、促销、个人销售和直接营销,是否会影响医生的处方行为。基于越来越多的伦理关注对特定药物的个人利益的促进,本研究还探讨了伦理意识形态在上述关系中的调节作用。设计/方法/方法为了达到研究目标,采用了定量研究方法。通过在线问卷调查,收集了巴基斯坦政府和私立医院的93名医生的数据,并利用结构方程建模技术分析了药品营销技术对医生处方决策的影响。研究结果表明,制药公司的营销策略对医生的处方行为有正向影响。此外,道德标准薄弱的医生很可能受到公司营销和促销行为的强烈影响。实际意义该研究对于理解医生的观点和制药公司在设计营销活动时需要解决的伦理问题至关重要。此外,这些发现对道德价值观和正确营销工具的发展之间的本质联系提供了重要的启示。原创性/价值据作者所知,这项研究是第一批以经验发展和测试医生在决定处方时所遵循的道德价值观的作用的研究之一。基于研究结果,鼓励未来的研究者进一步研究是否需要为制药公司设定界限并限制其在促销策略方面的使用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.10
自引率
8.30%
发文量
21
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信