{"title":"1914 Revisited: Evidence vs. Sophistry","authors":"John Zametica","doi":"10.31212/tokovi.2023.1.zam.277-290","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The response by Danilo Šarenac to a critical review of his own and two of his colleagues’ reflections on the 1914 Sarajevo assassination is subjected to close analysis of the specific details emphasized in that response","PeriodicalId":36359,"journal":{"name":"Tokovi Istorije","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-04-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Tokovi Istorije","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.31212/tokovi.2023.1.zam.277-290","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Arts and Humanities","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
The response by Danilo Šarenac to a critical review of his own and two of his colleagues’ reflections on the 1914 Sarajevo assassination is subjected to close analysis of the specific details emphasized in that response