1914 Revisited: Evidence vs. Sophistry

Q3 Arts and Humanities
John Zametica
{"title":"1914 Revisited: Evidence vs. Sophistry","authors":"John Zametica","doi":"10.31212/tokovi.2023.1.zam.277-290","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The response by Danilo Šarenac to a critical review of his own and two of his colleagues’ reflections on the 1914 Sarajevo assassination is subjected to close analysis of the specific details emphasized in that response","PeriodicalId":36359,"journal":{"name":"Tokovi Istorije","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-04-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Tokovi Istorije","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.31212/tokovi.2023.1.zam.277-290","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Arts and Humanities","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The response by Danilo Šarenac to a critical review of his own and two of his colleagues’ reflections on the 1914 Sarajevo assassination is subjected to close analysis of the specific details emphasized in that response
1914年重访:证据与诡辩
达尼洛Šarenac对他本人和他的两位同事对1914年萨拉热窝暗杀事件的看法所作的批评性审查的答复,需要对该答复中强调的具体细节进行仔细分析
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Tokovi Istorije
Tokovi Istorije Arts and Humanities-History
CiteScore
0.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
24
审稿时长
8 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信