Quality assurance for technological institutes in Mexico: competition and inequity

IF 1.5 Q2 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH
Sylvie Didou Aupetit
{"title":"Quality assurance for technological institutes in Mexico: competition and inequity","authors":"Sylvie Didou Aupetit","doi":"10.1108/qae-08-2021-0140","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\nPurpose\nThis study aims to analyze the external quality assurance (EQA) strategies of Technological Institutes (TIs) in Mexico, between 2010 and 2020. For this purpose, this study tracks sectoral reforms and institutional adaptation processes toward fulfilling accreditation indicators. This study considers accreditation as an emergent strategy for the governance and quality improvement of the subsystem, historically oriented towards contributing to social equity and national development projects. This study also examines the links between evaluation, quality assurance and the restructuring of public, technological higher education.\n\n\nDesign/methodology/approach\nThis study performs a state-of-the-art and exploratory study. This study explores the relationship between quality assurance, non-traditional institutions and regulation in Mexico. This study covers an issue that has been absent from research into the technological sector, particularly research into autonomy and leadership within its institutions. This study obtains qualitative information on those issues through interviews and two focus groups.\n\n\nFindings\nMechanisms such as regulatory schemes for the internal reform of TIs and sub-systemic prominence within the overall educational system show limitations owing to the inadequacy of accreditation indicators in accounting for the conditions in which TIs operate. To address this shortcoming and to aid TIs in accreditation endeavors, this study analyzes some features of this adaptive process that enable successful (student profiles, competitive admission criteria, teacher recruitment).\n\n\nResearch limitations/implications\nThe main limitation is that this paper reviews a sole country and presents just one case study. Other research on other higher education sub-systems can complete the analysis. In sum, there has been a lack of analysis of accreditation topics in Mexico, in the nontraditional institutions.\n\n\nPractical implications\nThis study provides a diagnosis of barriers to the participation of TIs in rankings and accreditation mechanisms, and their repercussions on management issues, governance patterns and reforms.\n\n\nSocial implications\nThis study outlined some internal obstacles linked with centralized model of conduction (data for monitoring, consensus on priorities, capabilities and financing) and external factors (shortages of assurance quality framing and institutional profiles, satisfaction with the process).\n\n\nOriginality/value\nThis study explores relationships between quality assurance, non-traditional institutions and regulation in Mexico, attending a lacking point in the research on the technological sector and autonomy/leadership of its institutions.\n","PeriodicalId":46734,"journal":{"name":"QUALITY ASSURANCE IN EDUCATION","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2022-05-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"QUALITY ASSURANCE IN EDUCATION","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/qae-08-2021-0140","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose This study aims to analyze the external quality assurance (EQA) strategies of Technological Institutes (TIs) in Mexico, between 2010 and 2020. For this purpose, this study tracks sectoral reforms and institutional adaptation processes toward fulfilling accreditation indicators. This study considers accreditation as an emergent strategy for the governance and quality improvement of the subsystem, historically oriented towards contributing to social equity and national development projects. This study also examines the links between evaluation, quality assurance and the restructuring of public, technological higher education. Design/methodology/approach This study performs a state-of-the-art and exploratory study. This study explores the relationship between quality assurance, non-traditional institutions and regulation in Mexico. This study covers an issue that has been absent from research into the technological sector, particularly research into autonomy and leadership within its institutions. This study obtains qualitative information on those issues through interviews and two focus groups. Findings Mechanisms such as regulatory schemes for the internal reform of TIs and sub-systemic prominence within the overall educational system show limitations owing to the inadequacy of accreditation indicators in accounting for the conditions in which TIs operate. To address this shortcoming and to aid TIs in accreditation endeavors, this study analyzes some features of this adaptive process that enable successful (student profiles, competitive admission criteria, teacher recruitment). Research limitations/implications The main limitation is that this paper reviews a sole country and presents just one case study. Other research on other higher education sub-systems can complete the analysis. In sum, there has been a lack of analysis of accreditation topics in Mexico, in the nontraditional institutions. Practical implications This study provides a diagnosis of barriers to the participation of TIs in rankings and accreditation mechanisms, and their repercussions on management issues, governance patterns and reforms. Social implications This study outlined some internal obstacles linked with centralized model of conduction (data for monitoring, consensus on priorities, capabilities and financing) and external factors (shortages of assurance quality framing and institutional profiles, satisfaction with the process). Originality/value This study explores relationships between quality assurance, non-traditional institutions and regulation in Mexico, attending a lacking point in the research on the technological sector and autonomy/leadership of its institutions.
墨西哥科技机构的质量保证:竞争与不公平
目的本研究旨在分析墨西哥技术研究院(TI)在2010年至2020年间的外部质量保证(EQA)策略。为此,本研究跟踪了实现认证指标的部门改革和机构适应过程。本研究将认证视为子系统治理和质量改进的一项新兴战略,历史上致力于促进社会公平和国家发展项目。本研究还考察了评估、质量保证和公立科技高等教育结构调整之间的联系。设计/方法论/方法本研究是一项最先进的探索性研究。本研究探讨了墨西哥的质量保证、非传统机构和监管之间的关系。这项研究涵盖了一个技术部门研究中没有的问题,特别是对其机构内部自主性和领导力的研究。本研究通过访谈和两个焦点小组获得了有关这些问题的定性信息。发现由于认证指标不足以说明教育机构的运作条件,诸如教育机构内部改革的监管计划和整个教育系统中的次系统重要性等机制显示出局限性。为了解决这一缺点,并帮助TI进行认证工作,本研究分析了这种适应性过程的一些特点,这些特点使其能够成功(学生档案、竞争性录取标准、教师招聘)。研究局限性/含义主要局限性在于本文回顾了一个单独的国家,只提出了一个案例研究。对其他高等教育子系统的其他研究可以完成分析。总之,墨西哥的非传统机构缺乏对认证主题的分析。实际含义本研究对TI参与排名和认证机制的障碍及其对管理问题、治理模式和改革的影响进行了诊断。社会影响本研究概述了与集中传导模式(监测数据、对优先事项、能力和融资的共识)和外部因素(缺乏保证质量框架和机构简介、对流程的满意度)相关的一些内部障碍。独创性/价值本研究探讨了墨西哥质量保证、非传统机构和监管之间的关系,指出了技术部门及其机构的自主性/领导力研究的不足。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
QUALITY ASSURANCE IN EDUCATION
QUALITY ASSURANCE IN EDUCATION EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH-
CiteScore
3.10
自引率
20.00%
发文量
47
期刊介绍: QAE publishes original empirical or theoretical articles on Quality Assurance issues, including dimensions and indicators of Quality and Quality Improvement, as applicable to education at all levels, including pre-primary, primary, secondary, higher and professional education. Periodically, QAE also publishes systematic reviews, research syntheses and assessment policy articles on topics of current significance. As an international journal, QAE seeks submissions on topics that have global relevance. Article submissions could pertain to the following areas integral to QAE''s mission: -organizational or program development, change and improvement -educational testing or assessment programs -evaluation of educational innovations, programs and projects -school efficiency assessments -standards, reforms, accountability, accreditation, and audits in education -tools, criteria and methods for examining or assuring quality
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信