Towards an intersectional approach to populism: comparative perspectives from Finland and India

IF 2 3区 社会学 Q1 POLITICAL SCIENCE
Shweta Singh, É. Féron
{"title":"Towards an intersectional approach to populism: comparative perspectives from Finland and India","authors":"Shweta Singh, É. Féron","doi":"10.1080/13569775.2021.1917164","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT Building on a comparison between the Finns Party in Finland, and the BJP in India, we propose to understand populist mobilisation through its core discursive sequences, rather than by relying upon traditional left-right or radical-moderate axes of analysis. Developing an original methodology, we suggest to classify populist radical right (PRR) movements depending on whether they include or exclude individuals on the basis of their religious, ethnic, class, caste, age, or gender identity, or several of these axes at the same time. Our comparative analysis buttresses Laclau's idea that PRR discourses across different cultural contexts center around the concept of the people as the ‘empty signifier’, which can be filled with any specific content. However, our intersectional analysis also reveals PRR discourses to be complex constructs, building on rather similar intersections, but whose meaning and appeal vary across political and cultural settings.","PeriodicalId":51673,"journal":{"name":"Contemporary Politics","volume":"27 1","pages":"528 - 549"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-04-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/13569775.2021.1917164","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Contemporary Politics","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/13569775.2021.1917164","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"POLITICAL SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

ABSTRACT Building on a comparison between the Finns Party in Finland, and the BJP in India, we propose to understand populist mobilisation through its core discursive sequences, rather than by relying upon traditional left-right or radical-moderate axes of analysis. Developing an original methodology, we suggest to classify populist radical right (PRR) movements depending on whether they include or exclude individuals on the basis of their religious, ethnic, class, caste, age, or gender identity, or several of these axes at the same time. Our comparative analysis buttresses Laclau's idea that PRR discourses across different cultural contexts center around the concept of the people as the ‘empty signifier’, which can be filled with any specific content. However, our intersectional analysis also reveals PRR discourses to be complex constructs, building on rather similar intersections, but whose meaning and appeal vary across political and cultural settings.
走向民粹主义的交叉方法:芬兰和印度的比较视角
摘要在比较芬兰芬兰人党和印度人民党的基础上,我们建议通过其核心话语序列来理解民粹主义动员,而不是依赖传统的左右或激进的温和分析轴。在开发一种独创的方法时,我们建议根据民粹主义激进右翼运动是否基于宗教、种族、阶级、种姓、年龄或性别认同,或同时基于其中几个轴心,将其纳入或排除在外,对其进行分类。我们的比较分析支持了拉克劳的观点,即不同文化背景下的PRR话语围绕着人作为“空能指”的概念展开,这个概念可以充满任何特定的内容。然而,我们的交叉分析也揭示了PRR话语是一种复杂的结构,建立在相当相似的交叉点上,但其含义和吸引力在政治和文化环境中各不相同。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Contemporary Politics
Contemporary Politics POLITICAL SCIENCE-
CiteScore
4.30
自引率
10.00%
发文量
21
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信