SEGMENTATION OF LANDSAT-8 IMAGES FOR BURNED AREA DETECTION WITH DEEP LEARNING

Q2 Social Sciences
D. Alkan, L. Karasaka
{"title":"SEGMENTATION OF LANDSAT-8 IMAGES FOR BURNED AREA DETECTION WITH DEEP LEARNING","authors":"D. Alkan, L. Karasaka","doi":"10.5194/isprs-archives-xlviii-m-1-2023-455-2023","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract. Fires damage nature and living beings. Detection of this damage is important for future. In this study, it was aimed to determine burned areas. For this purpose, Landsat-8 images and U-Net model were used. Python language was preferred. Band combinations 7,5,4; 5,3,7; 5,4,3; 4,3,2; 4,3,2,5 and 2,3,4,5,6,7 have been tried. Train and test processes were carried out separately for each band combination. After the train and test processes were completed, a probability result consisting of values between 0-1 was obtained. Then, a threshold value was used. Thus, binary results consisting of 0 and 1 values were obtained. Three different values were preferred for the threshold: 0.1, 0.5 and 0.9. Thus, the effect of threshold value selection on the test results was examined. The prediction results were evaluated using the masks. For this, general accuracy, recall, precision, F1-score and Jaccard score metrics were used. Recall, precision, and F1-score values were calculated for both burned areas and unburned areas. In addition, minimum, maximum, mean, and standard deviation values were calculated for each metric. When the results are examined, it is seen that the model gives better results when the threshold value is 0.1 and 0.5. Among the band combinations, it is seen that the 7,5,4 combination gave better results than the others. For this band combination, the highest mean accuracy is 0.9743 with the 0.5 threshold value. For this threshold mean recall, mean precision and mean F1-score for burned areas are 0.7203, 0.8411 and 0.7601, respectively. And Jaccard score is 0.6328.\n","PeriodicalId":30634,"journal":{"name":"The International Archives of the Photogrammetry Remote Sensing and Spatial Information Sciences","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-08-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The International Archives of the Photogrammetry Remote Sensing and Spatial Information Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5194/isprs-archives-xlviii-m-1-2023-455-2023","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract. Fires damage nature and living beings. Detection of this damage is important for future. In this study, it was aimed to determine burned areas. For this purpose, Landsat-8 images and U-Net model were used. Python language was preferred. Band combinations 7,5,4; 5,3,7; 5,4,3; 4,3,2; 4,3,2,5 and 2,3,4,5,6,7 have been tried. Train and test processes were carried out separately for each band combination. After the train and test processes were completed, a probability result consisting of values between 0-1 was obtained. Then, a threshold value was used. Thus, binary results consisting of 0 and 1 values were obtained. Three different values were preferred for the threshold: 0.1, 0.5 and 0.9. Thus, the effect of threshold value selection on the test results was examined. The prediction results were evaluated using the masks. For this, general accuracy, recall, precision, F1-score and Jaccard score metrics were used. Recall, precision, and F1-score values were calculated for both burned areas and unburned areas. In addition, minimum, maximum, mean, and standard deviation values were calculated for each metric. When the results are examined, it is seen that the model gives better results when the threshold value is 0.1 and 0.5. Among the band combinations, it is seen that the 7,5,4 combination gave better results than the others. For this band combination, the highest mean accuracy is 0.9743 with the 0.5 threshold value. For this threshold mean recall, mean precision and mean F1-score for burned areas are 0.7203, 0.8411 and 0.7601, respectively. And Jaccard score is 0.6328.
基于深度学习的LANDSAT-8图像分割烧伤区域检测
摘要火灾破坏自然和生命。检测这种损伤对未来很重要。在这项研究中,它旨在确定烧伤面积。为此,使用了陆地卫星-8号图像和U-Net模型。首选Python语言。频带组合7,5,4;5,3,7;5,4,3;4,3,2;4,3,2,5和2,3,4,5,6,7已经进行了试验。对每个波段组合分别进行训练和测试过程。在训练和测试过程完成后,获得了由0-1之间的值组成的概率结果。然后,使用阈值。因此,获得了由0和1值组成的二进制结果。阈值优选三个不同的值:0.1、0.5和0.9。因此,研究了阈值选择对测试结果的影响。使用掩模对预测结果进行了评估。为此,使用了一般准确度、召回率、准确度、F1分数和Jaccard分数指标。计算燃烧区域和未燃烧区域的召回率、精确度和F1评分值。此外,还计算了每个度量的最小值、最大值、平均值和标准偏差值。当检查结果时,可以看出,当阈值为0.1和0.5时,该模型给出了更好的结果。在频带组合中,可以看出7、5、4组合比其他组合给出了更好的结果。对于该频带组合,最高平均精度为0.9743,阈值为0.5。对于该阈值平均召回,烧伤区域的平均精度和平均F1得分分别为0.7203、0.8411和0.7601。Jaccard得分为0.6328。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
949
审稿时长
16 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信