Historical Analysis of EPI in Colombia (2006-2014): Challenges on Environmental Information

A. González, M. Echeverry‐Galvis
{"title":"Historical Analysis of EPI in Colombia (2006-2014): Challenges on Environmental Information","authors":"A. González, M. Echeverry‐Galvis","doi":"10.15446/ga.v22n1.78614","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The use of environmental indicators has been established as a way of addressing different variables and objects of analysis, including the complexity of biodiversity and ecosystems along with human wellbeing. Since 2006, the Environmental Performance Index has been used, ranking countries according to status of various indicators. Colombia has been included in all evaluations with variable results in its ranking. We examine some aspects that vary through the years in terms of the index and the performance of Colombia in evaluations from 2006 to 2014, mostly because Colombia had excellent scores at the beginning of the index measure, but decrease notoriously in the last ones that have made. We found that the historical evaluation of the EPI had differences in its structure, with a greater reliability on international databases rather than national information, as well as a continuum change of the types of variables used for the indicators. On an international context, Colombia’s ranking variation reflects the differences in sources and accessibility of data. As useful as indexes might be to monitor and manage of resources, it is important to analyse each evaluation as much more than just the best and worst indicators, but rather to look at the sources, types of variables, ad context of each evaluation.","PeriodicalId":30434,"journal":{"name":"Gestion y Ambiente","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Gestion y Ambiente","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15446/ga.v22n1.78614","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The use of environmental indicators has been established as a way of addressing different variables and objects of analysis, including the complexity of biodiversity and ecosystems along with human wellbeing. Since 2006, the Environmental Performance Index has been used, ranking countries according to status of various indicators. Colombia has been included in all evaluations with variable results in its ranking. We examine some aspects that vary through the years in terms of the index and the performance of Colombia in evaluations from 2006 to 2014, mostly because Colombia had excellent scores at the beginning of the index measure, but decrease notoriously in the last ones that have made. We found that the historical evaluation of the EPI had differences in its structure, with a greater reliability on international databases rather than national information, as well as a continuum change of the types of variables used for the indicators. On an international context, Colombia’s ranking variation reflects the differences in sources and accessibility of data. As useful as indexes might be to monitor and manage of resources, it is important to analyse each evaluation as much more than just the best and worst indicators, but rather to look at the sources, types of variables, ad context of each evaluation.
哥伦比亚EPI的历史分析(2006-2014):环境信息的挑战
环境指标的使用已被确定为解决不同变量和分析对象的一种方式,包括生物多样性和生态系统的复杂性以及人类福祉。自2006年以来,一直使用环境绩效指数,根据各种指标的状况对各国进行排名。哥伦比亚已被纳入所有评价,其排名结果各不相同。我们研究了哥伦比亚在2006年至2014年评估中的指数和表现在不同年份的一些方面,主要是因为哥伦比亚在指数衡量开始时得分很高,但在最后一次评估中却明显下降。我们发现,EPI的历史评估在结构上存在差异,国际数据库而非国家信息的可靠性更高,用于指标的变量类型也在不断变化。在国际范围内,哥伦比亚的排名变化反映了数据来源和可及性的差异。尽管指数对监测和管理资源可能很有用,但重要的是,分析每一次评估,而不仅仅是最好和最差的指标,而是要着眼于每一次评价的来源、变量类型和背景。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
7
审稿时长
37 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信