Analyzing Usability of Mobile Banking Applications in Pakistan

H. Malik, A. Muhammad, Usama Sajid
{"title":"Analyzing Usability of Mobile Banking Applications in Pakistan","authors":"H. Malik, A. Muhammad, Usama Sajid","doi":"10.30537/sjcms.v5i2.883","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Usability is a key factor in the quality of the product, which includes ease of use, user satisfaction and the ability of the user to quickly understand the product without practice. As smartphone usage increases, most organizations have shifted their services to mobile applications, such as m-banking. Most of the people uses banking services but hesitate to use m-banking due to complex interfaces. Usability researchers concentrate on the value of design simplicity so that users can perform a particular task with satisfaction, efficiency, and effectiveness. If a mobile app lacks one of these usability features, users may get confused while using the app. This research examines the key usability issues in existing m-banking after checking the usability satisfaction level through System Usability Scale. To compare and highlight a number of usability issues, the researcher used two types of usability evaluation method 'User Testing' and 'Heuristic Evaluation'. In heuristic evaluation expert users used two M-banking apps i.e. Bank of Punjab (BOP) and MCB Islamic Bank (MIB) to evaluate them against Neilson 10 heuristics and extract the usability issues in apps. The user testing is then performed by novice users which includes tasks (translated from extracted problems by heuristic evaluation). After completion on whole testing users filled the post-test SUS’s questionnaire. The result shows that the overall success rate of the tasks was 83%, SUS score was 77 and overall relative time-based efficiency very 54.2%. The expert evaluators found 83% minor errors and 17% major errors. The finding of this paper shows  usability problems and recommendations are provided to increase the usability of mobile banking applications at the end of this paper.","PeriodicalId":32391,"journal":{"name":"Sukkur IBA Journal of Computing and Mathematical Sciences","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-12-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"6","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Sukkur IBA Journal of Computing and Mathematical Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.30537/sjcms.v5i2.883","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 6

Abstract

Usability is a key factor in the quality of the product, which includes ease of use, user satisfaction and the ability of the user to quickly understand the product without practice. As smartphone usage increases, most organizations have shifted their services to mobile applications, such as m-banking. Most of the people uses banking services but hesitate to use m-banking due to complex interfaces. Usability researchers concentrate on the value of design simplicity so that users can perform a particular task with satisfaction, efficiency, and effectiveness. If a mobile app lacks one of these usability features, users may get confused while using the app. This research examines the key usability issues in existing m-banking after checking the usability satisfaction level through System Usability Scale. To compare and highlight a number of usability issues, the researcher used two types of usability evaluation method 'User Testing' and 'Heuristic Evaluation'. In heuristic evaluation expert users used two M-banking apps i.e. Bank of Punjab (BOP) and MCB Islamic Bank (MIB) to evaluate them against Neilson 10 heuristics and extract the usability issues in apps. The user testing is then performed by novice users which includes tasks (translated from extracted problems by heuristic evaluation). After completion on whole testing users filled the post-test SUS’s questionnaire. The result shows that the overall success rate of the tasks was 83%, SUS score was 77 and overall relative time-based efficiency very 54.2%. The expert evaluators found 83% minor errors and 17% major errors. The finding of this paper shows  usability problems and recommendations are provided to increase the usability of mobile banking applications at the end of this paper.
分析巴基斯坦移动银行应用程序的可用性
可用性是产品质量的关键因素,它包括易用性、用户满意度和用户无需实践就能快速理解产品的能力。随着智能手机使用量的增加,大多数组织已经将他们的服务转向移动应用程序,比如移动银行。大多数人使用银行服务,但由于复杂的界面,他们对使用移动银行犹豫不决。可用性研究人员关注设计简单性的价值,以便用户能够满意、高效和有效地执行特定的任务。如果手机应用程序缺乏这些可用性功能之一,用户在使用应用程序时可能会感到困惑。本研究通过系统可用性量表检查可用性满意度后,检查了现有手机银行的关键可用性问题。为了比较和突出一些可用性问题,研究者使用了两种可用性评估方法“用户测试”和“启发式评估”。在启发式评估中,专家用户使用两个移动银行应用程序,即旁遮普银行(BOP)和MCB伊斯兰银行(MIB),根据尼尔森10启发式评估它们,并提取应用程序中的可用性问题。然后由新手用户执行用户测试,其中包括任务(通过启发式评估从提取的问题中翻译出来)。在完成整个测试后,用户填写测试后SUS的问卷。结果表明,任务的总体成功率为83%,SUS得分为77分,总体相对时间效率为54.2%。专家评估人员发现了83%的小错误和17%的大错误。本文的发现显示了可用性问题,并在本文的最后提出了提高手机银行应用程序可用性的建议。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
10
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信