Stress distribution in implant-supported fixed dental prosthesis (Pontic Design) using two different framework materials: A finite element analysis

Q4 Medicine
Gunjan Tahilramani, Deepali Barapatre, S. Mishra, S. Bhasmey, R. Chowdhary
{"title":"Stress distribution in implant-supported fixed dental prosthesis (Pontic Design) using two different framework materials: A finite element analysis","authors":"Gunjan Tahilramani, Deepali Barapatre, S. Mishra, S. Bhasmey, R. Chowdhary","doi":"10.4103/jdmimsu.jdmimsu_359_22","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Aim and Objectives: The stresses transferred from the implant to the surrounding bone greatly influence the clinical outcome of the implant-supported prosthesis. The role of implant-supported prostheses made from zirconia and polyether ether ketone (PEEK) material in transferring stresses is not much known. The purpose of the finite element analysis study was to evaluate stress distribution in an implant-supported fixed dental prosthesis (FDP) using two different framework materials. Materials and Methods: Two three-dimensional models of implant-supported FDPs were designed using ANSYS software, with implants in right maxillary central incisor and canine regions supporting a three-unit fixed partial denture. Model 1 was made using zirconia as a framework material and model 2 using PEEK as a framework material. A static load of 100 N was applied in two directions, i.e., vertically and obliquely at an angle of 30° along the long axis of the implant. The von Mises stress analysis was done to find stresses generated in implants and the prosthesis, and the maximum and minimum principal stress analyses were used to find the stress generated in the bone. Results: Under both the loading conditions, maximum stress concentration was observed in the connector region of model 1 (zirconia group) compared to model 2 (PEEK group); 6.28 MPa versus 2.17 MPa in vertical loading and 8.85 MPa versus 2.69 MPa in oblique loading, respectively. The stresses generated in bone were nearly similar in both models. Conclusion: The framework material does affect the load-bearing capacity of the prosthesis. Stresses observed with PEEK as framework material were lesser compared to zirconia. Therefore, PEEK can be considered a suitable framework material for implant-supported FDPs.","PeriodicalId":15592,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Datta Meghe Institute of Medical Sciences University","volume":"18 1","pages":"239 - 243"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Datta Meghe Institute of Medical Sciences University","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/jdmimsu.jdmimsu_359_22","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Aim and Objectives: The stresses transferred from the implant to the surrounding bone greatly influence the clinical outcome of the implant-supported prosthesis. The role of implant-supported prostheses made from zirconia and polyether ether ketone (PEEK) material in transferring stresses is not much known. The purpose of the finite element analysis study was to evaluate stress distribution in an implant-supported fixed dental prosthesis (FDP) using two different framework materials. Materials and Methods: Two three-dimensional models of implant-supported FDPs were designed using ANSYS software, with implants in right maxillary central incisor and canine regions supporting a three-unit fixed partial denture. Model 1 was made using zirconia as a framework material and model 2 using PEEK as a framework material. A static load of 100 N was applied in two directions, i.e., vertically and obliquely at an angle of 30° along the long axis of the implant. The von Mises stress analysis was done to find stresses generated in implants and the prosthesis, and the maximum and minimum principal stress analyses were used to find the stress generated in the bone. Results: Under both the loading conditions, maximum stress concentration was observed in the connector region of model 1 (zirconia group) compared to model 2 (PEEK group); 6.28 MPa versus 2.17 MPa in vertical loading and 8.85 MPa versus 2.69 MPa in oblique loading, respectively. The stresses generated in bone were nearly similar in both models. Conclusion: The framework material does affect the load-bearing capacity of the prosthesis. Stresses observed with PEEK as framework material were lesser compared to zirconia. Therefore, PEEK can be considered a suitable framework material for implant-supported FDPs.
使用两种不同框架材料的种植体支撑固定义齿(Pontic Design)的应力分布:有限元分析
目的和目的:种植体对周围骨的应力传递对种植体支持的临床效果有很大影响。由氧化锆和聚醚醚酮(PEEK)材料制成的假体在转移应力中的作用尚不清楚。有限元分析研究的目的是评估使用两种不同框架材料的种植支撑固定义齿(FDP)的应力分布。材料与方法:采用ANSYS软件设计两种种植体支撑的三维FDPs模型,种植体分别在右侧上颌中切牙和犬齿区支撑三单元固定局部义齿。模型1采用氧化锆作为框架材料,模型2采用PEEK作为框架材料。沿种植体长轴方向以30°夹角在垂直和倾斜两个方向施加100 N的静载荷。采用von Mises应力分析法分析种植体和假体内部产生的应力,采用最大和最小主应力分析法分析骨内产生的应力。结果:两种加载条件下,与模型2 (PEEK组)相比,模型1(氧化锆组)接头区域的应力集中最大;垂直加载时分别为6.28 MPa和2.17 MPa,倾斜加载时分别为8.85 MPa和2.69 MPa。在两个模型中,骨骼中产生的应力几乎相似。结论:框架材料对假体的承载能力有一定影响。与氧化锆相比,以PEEK为框架材料观察到的应力较小。因此,PEEK可以被认为是种植体支持fdp的合适框架材料。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
43
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信