Oral cavity cancers treated with superselective intra-arterial chemoradiotherapy with radiation doses less than 60 Gy: implications for dose reduction from a propensity score-matched analysis
H. Kaizu, M. Hata, K. Mitsudo, Y. Hayashi, E. Ito, M. Sugiura, S. Takano, Y. Mukai, I. Koike, T. Koizumi
{"title":"Oral cavity cancers treated with superselective intra-arterial chemoradiotherapy with radiation doses less than 60 Gy: implications for dose reduction from a propensity score-matched analysis","authors":"H. Kaizu, M. Hata, K. Mitsudo, Y. Hayashi, E. Ito, M. Sugiura, S. Takano, Y. Mukai, I. Koike, T. Koizumi","doi":"10.18869/ACADPUB.IJRR.18.3.531","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: The optimal radiation dose for oral cavity cancers treated with retrograde superselective intra-arterial chemoradiotherapy (SIACRT) is unclear. The aim of the present study was to evaluate the treatment outcome and toxicity in patients treated with <60 Gy compared with those treated with ≥60 Gy to provide evidence for determining the optimal dose. Materials and Methods: Between January 2009 and December 2013, 159 oral cavity cancer patients were treated with SIACRT with curative intent at a single institution. One hundred and twenty-nine patients received ≥60 Gy and 30 received <60 Gy. Local control (LC), disease-free survival (DFS), overall survival (OS), and toxicity were compared. Propensity score matching was performed to reduce bias. Results: The median follow-up period was 48 months (range, 2–88 months). LC (<60 Gy vs. ≥60 Gy, 81.5% vs. 86.1% at 3 years, p = 0.534), DFS (68.8% vs. 72.4% at 3 years, p = 0.816), and OS (85.9% vs. 72.3% at 3 years, p = 0.132) were comparable between the two groups. There was also no difference in toxicity. However, the median overall treatment period was significantly shorter in the <60 Gy cohort (39 days vs. 49 days, p < 0.0001). Conclusion: The radiation dose may be reduced to <60 Gy when treating oral cavity cancers with SIACRT.","PeriodicalId":14498,"journal":{"name":"Iranian Journal of Radiation Research","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-07-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Iranian Journal of Radiation Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18869/ACADPUB.IJRR.18.3.531","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Health Professions","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: The optimal radiation dose for oral cavity cancers treated with retrograde superselective intra-arterial chemoradiotherapy (SIACRT) is unclear. The aim of the present study was to evaluate the treatment outcome and toxicity in patients treated with <60 Gy compared with those treated with ≥60 Gy to provide evidence for determining the optimal dose. Materials and Methods: Between January 2009 and December 2013, 159 oral cavity cancer patients were treated with SIACRT with curative intent at a single institution. One hundred and twenty-nine patients received ≥60 Gy and 30 received <60 Gy. Local control (LC), disease-free survival (DFS), overall survival (OS), and toxicity were compared. Propensity score matching was performed to reduce bias. Results: The median follow-up period was 48 months (range, 2–88 months). LC (<60 Gy vs. ≥60 Gy, 81.5% vs. 86.1% at 3 years, p = 0.534), DFS (68.8% vs. 72.4% at 3 years, p = 0.816), and OS (85.9% vs. 72.3% at 3 years, p = 0.132) were comparable between the two groups. There was also no difference in toxicity. However, the median overall treatment period was significantly shorter in the <60 Gy cohort (39 days vs. 49 days, p < 0.0001). Conclusion: The radiation dose may be reduced to <60 Gy when treating oral cavity cancers with SIACRT.
期刊介绍:
Iranian Journal of Radiation Research (IJRR) publishes original scientific research and clinical investigations related to radiation oncology, radiation biology, and Medical and health physics. The clinical studies submitted for publication include experimental studies of combined modality treatment, especially chemoradiotherapy approaches, and relevant innovations in hyperthermia, brachytherapy, high LET irradiation, nuclear medicine, dosimetry, tumor imaging, radiation treatment planning, radiosensitizers, and radioprotectors. All manuscripts must pass stringent peer-review and only papers that are rated of high scientific quality are accepted.