Special Education Teacher Supply and Teacher Quality: The Problems, The Solutions.

Mary T. Brownell, P. Sindelar, A. G. Bishop, Lisa K. Langley, Seonjin Seo
{"title":"Special Education Teacher Supply and Teacher Quality: The Problems, The Solutions.","authors":"Mary T. Brownell, P. Sindelar, A. G. Bishop, Lisa K. Langley, Seonjin Seo","doi":"10.17161/FOEC.V35I2.6794","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Special education is facing the daunting challenge of increasing the supply of teachers while simultaneously upgrading its quality. Shortages of fully qualified teachers have plagued special education for two decades, and schools also have struggled to find qualified math, science, and ESL teachers. Shortages in all of these fields are likely to worsen as the teaching workforce ages and as statewide initiatives (such as reductions in class size) fuel increased demand. The quality of the teaching workforce also has come under scrutiny, as schools across the country are initiating standards-based reforms in which teacher competence is linked to student performance on high-stakes assessments. In this article, we first consider two policy initiatives that address the dilemma of increasing numbers and improving quality simultaneously. We then consider the problem of attrition, which contributes in significant ways to both the quantity and quality issues. We explain why attrition is a particular problem for beginning teachers and describe programs that have proven effective in combating it. In response to burgeoning demand and dissatisfaction with the quality of the existing workforce, the Bush Administration has promulgated policies to increase supply, notably through the No Child Left Behind (NCLB) Act, the most recent authorization of what had been known as the Elementary and Secondary Education Act. These initiatives are designed to promote easy entry to the profession via alternative training routes for specific populations of teacher candidates. Previously, the National Commission for Teaching and America's Future (NCTAF) had issued a policy blueprint in 1996 that addressed shortages and quality in a different manner, emphasizing the professionalization of teaching and the enhancement of schools as workplaces. It was argued that fewer teachers would leave the field-and more candidates would be attracted to it-if they ~ere to teach at schools that would support their work and foster their professional growth, and if they were to earn a professional wage.","PeriodicalId":89924,"journal":{"name":"Focus on exceptional children","volume":"35 1","pages":"1-16"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-12-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.17161/FOEC.V35I2.6794","citationCount":"17","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Focus on exceptional children","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.17161/FOEC.V35I2.6794","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 17

Abstract

Special education is facing the daunting challenge of increasing the supply of teachers while simultaneously upgrading its quality. Shortages of fully qualified teachers have plagued special education for two decades, and schools also have struggled to find qualified math, science, and ESL teachers. Shortages in all of these fields are likely to worsen as the teaching workforce ages and as statewide initiatives (such as reductions in class size) fuel increased demand. The quality of the teaching workforce also has come under scrutiny, as schools across the country are initiating standards-based reforms in which teacher competence is linked to student performance on high-stakes assessments. In this article, we first consider two policy initiatives that address the dilemma of increasing numbers and improving quality simultaneously. We then consider the problem of attrition, which contributes in significant ways to both the quantity and quality issues. We explain why attrition is a particular problem for beginning teachers and describe programs that have proven effective in combating it. In response to burgeoning demand and dissatisfaction with the quality of the existing workforce, the Bush Administration has promulgated policies to increase supply, notably through the No Child Left Behind (NCLB) Act, the most recent authorization of what had been known as the Elementary and Secondary Education Act. These initiatives are designed to promote easy entry to the profession via alternative training routes for specific populations of teacher candidates. Previously, the National Commission for Teaching and America's Future (NCTAF) had issued a policy blueprint in 1996 that addressed shortages and quality in a different manner, emphasizing the professionalization of teaching and the enhancement of schools as workplaces. It was argued that fewer teachers would leave the field-and more candidates would be attracted to it-if they ~ere to teach at schools that would support their work and foster their professional growth, and if they were to earn a professional wage.
特殊教育教师供给与教师素质:问题与对策。
特殊教育面临着在提高教师质量的同时增加教师供应的艰巨挑战。20年来,完全合格的教师短缺一直困扰着特殊教育,学校也很难找到合格的数学、科学和ESL教师。随着教师队伍的老龄化,以及全州范围内的举措(如减少班级规模)刺激需求的增加,所有这些领域的短缺都可能加剧。教师队伍的质量也受到了审查,因为全国各地的学校都在启动基于标准的改革,将教师能力与学生在高风险评估中的表现联系起来。在本文中,我们首先考虑两项政策举措,它们同时解决了增加数量和提高质量的困境。然后,我们考虑损耗问题,这在很大程度上导致了数量和质量问题。我们解释了为什么减员对初任教师来说是一个特殊的问题,并描述了已被证明有效应对这一问题的计划。为了应对日益增长的需求和对现有劳动力质量的不满,布什政府颁布了增加供应的政策,特别是通过《不让一个孩子掉队法》,《中小学教育法》的最新授权。这些举措旨在通过为特定人群的教师候选人提供替代培训途径,促进他们轻松进入该行业。此前,国家教学与美国未来委员会(NCTAF)于1996年发布了一份政策蓝图,以不同的方式解决短缺和质量问题,强调教学专业化和加强学校作为工作场所的作用。有人认为,如果教师在支持他们工作和促进他们专业成长的学校任教,如果他们能挣到专业工资,那么离开这一领域的教师就会减少,更多的候选人就会被吸引。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信