Effects of Environmental Factors on Carbon Stocks of Dry Evergreen Afromontane Forests of the Choke Mountain Ecosystem, Northwestern Ethiopia

Q2 Agricultural and Biological Sciences
Fikirte Asrat, T. Soromessa, T. Bekele, R. M. Kurakalva, Sravya Sai Guddeti, D. Smart, K. Steger
{"title":"Effects of Environmental Factors on Carbon Stocks of Dry Evergreen Afromontane Forests of the Choke Mountain Ecosystem, Northwestern Ethiopia","authors":"Fikirte Asrat, T. Soromessa, T. Bekele, R. M. Kurakalva, Sravya Sai Guddeti, D. Smart, K. Steger","doi":"10.1155/2022/9447946","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The purpose of this research was to quantify and compare carbon stocks in two selected dry evergreen montane forests of the Choke Mountain ecosystem that are under different management regimes. The study also attempted to assess the carbon stock along environmental gradients. The average carbon stock throughout the whole plots investigated in Anshirava forest (protected) was 180.18 t·ha−1 (53%) in AGB, 111.43 t·ha−1 (33%) in soil, 36.43 t·ha−1 (11%) in BGB, 6.09 t·ha−1 (2%) in USB, 2.69 t·ha−1 (1%) in litter, and 1.36 t·ha−1 (less than 1%) in DW. In Ziba forest (high human intervention), the average carbon stock was 106.71 t·ha−1 (44%) in AGB, 100.07 t·ha−1 (42%) in soil, 21.34 t·ha−1 (9%) in BGB, 5.41 t·ha−1 (2%) in USB, 4.82 t·ha−1 (2%) in litter, and 2.00 t·ha−1 (1%) in DW. The AGB had the greatest carbon share in both forests, followed by soil. In Anshirava and Ziba forests, the mean total carbon stocks (TCS) were 338.18 t·ha−1 and 240.36 t·ha−1, with CO2 equivalents of 1241.14 t·ha−1 and 882.12 t·ha−1, respectively. The study indicated a significant variation between the two forests. Anshirava forest has larger total carbon stocks than Ziba forest. For lower, medium, and higher altitudes, the total carbon stock variation along an altitudinal gradient was 289.67 t·ha−1, 347.93 t·ha−1, and 414.89 t·ha−1 in Anshirava forest and 270.99 t·ha−1, 204.24 t·ha−1, and 224.82 t·ha−1 in Ziba forest, respectively. As a result, a greater amount of carbon was stored at higher altitudes in Anshirava and at lower altitudes in Ziba, with no significant difference in both forests. The total carbon stock variation along slope gradient was 392.60 t·ha−1, 344.59 t·ha−1, and 295.49 t·ha−1 in Anshirava forest and 258.74 t·ha−1, 222.46 t·ha−1, and 171.46 t·ha−1 in Ziba forest for flat, intermediate, and steep slopes, respectively. This resulted in higher carbon being stored in flat slopes in both forests. Also, only at the Ziba site, a significant difference was found along the slope gradient. In each forest, eight distinct aspect facings were observed, with the western (W) aspect containing the highest value of total carbon stock in both forests. Lower values, on the other hand, were recorded in the south (S) and flat (F) aspects of Anshirava and Ziba forests, respectively. The slope aspects of both forests varied significantly. As a result, the research reveals that environmental factors have a significant impact on carbon stock value of Choke Mountain forest ecosystem, but the impact is not consistent among carbon pools.","PeriodicalId":14099,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Forestry Research","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-04-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"6","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Forestry Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1155/2022/9447946","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 6

Abstract

The purpose of this research was to quantify and compare carbon stocks in two selected dry evergreen montane forests of the Choke Mountain ecosystem that are under different management regimes. The study also attempted to assess the carbon stock along environmental gradients. The average carbon stock throughout the whole plots investigated in Anshirava forest (protected) was 180.18 t·ha−1 (53%) in AGB, 111.43 t·ha−1 (33%) in soil, 36.43 t·ha−1 (11%) in BGB, 6.09 t·ha−1 (2%) in USB, 2.69 t·ha−1 (1%) in litter, and 1.36 t·ha−1 (less than 1%) in DW. In Ziba forest (high human intervention), the average carbon stock was 106.71 t·ha−1 (44%) in AGB, 100.07 t·ha−1 (42%) in soil, 21.34 t·ha−1 (9%) in BGB, 5.41 t·ha−1 (2%) in USB, 4.82 t·ha−1 (2%) in litter, and 2.00 t·ha−1 (1%) in DW. The AGB had the greatest carbon share in both forests, followed by soil. In Anshirava and Ziba forests, the mean total carbon stocks (TCS) were 338.18 t·ha−1 and 240.36 t·ha−1, with CO2 equivalents of 1241.14 t·ha−1 and 882.12 t·ha−1, respectively. The study indicated a significant variation between the two forests. Anshirava forest has larger total carbon stocks than Ziba forest. For lower, medium, and higher altitudes, the total carbon stock variation along an altitudinal gradient was 289.67 t·ha−1, 347.93 t·ha−1, and 414.89 t·ha−1 in Anshirava forest and 270.99 t·ha−1, 204.24 t·ha−1, and 224.82 t·ha−1 in Ziba forest, respectively. As a result, a greater amount of carbon was stored at higher altitudes in Anshirava and at lower altitudes in Ziba, with no significant difference in both forests. The total carbon stock variation along slope gradient was 392.60 t·ha−1, 344.59 t·ha−1, and 295.49 t·ha−1 in Anshirava forest and 258.74 t·ha−1, 222.46 t·ha−1, and 171.46 t·ha−1 in Ziba forest for flat, intermediate, and steep slopes, respectively. This resulted in higher carbon being stored in flat slopes in both forests. Also, only at the Ziba site, a significant difference was found along the slope gradient. In each forest, eight distinct aspect facings were observed, with the western (W) aspect containing the highest value of total carbon stock in both forests. Lower values, on the other hand, were recorded in the south (S) and flat (F) aspects of Anshirava and Ziba forests, respectively. The slope aspects of both forests varied significantly. As a result, the research reveals that environmental factors have a significant impact on carbon stock value of Choke Mountain forest ecosystem, but the impact is not consistent among carbon pools.
环境因子对埃塞俄比亚西北部呛山生态系统非洲山地干常绿森林碳储量的影响
本研究的目的是量化和比较不同管理制度下咽喉山生态系统中两种干燥常绿山地森林的碳储量。本研究还试图评估沿环境梯度的碳储量。安什拉瓦森林(保护林)全样地平均碳储量分别为:AGB区180.18 t·ha−1(53%)、土壤111.43 t·ha−1(33%)、BGB区36.43 t·ha−1(11%)、USB区6.09 t·ha−1(2%)、凋落物2.69 t·ha−1(1%)、DW区1.36 t·ha−1(不到1%)。在高人为干预的紫坝森林中,平均碳储量为:AGB区106.71 t·ha−1(44%),土壤100.07 t·ha−1 (42%),BGB区21.34 t·ha−1 (9%),USB区5.41 t·ha−1(2%),凋落物4.82 t·ha−1 (2%),DW区2.00 t·ha−1(1%)。两种森林中AGB的碳份额最大,其次是土壤。安什拉瓦和梓坝森林的平均总碳储量分别为338.18和240.36 t·ha - 1,二氧化碳当量分别为1241.14和882.12 t·ha - 1。研究表明,这两种森林之间存在显著差异。安什拉瓦森林的总碳储量大于梓坝森林。在低、中、高海拔地区,安什拉瓦森林的总碳储量沿海拔梯度变化分别为289.67 t·ha−1、347.93 t·ha−1和414.89 t·ha−1,梓坝森林的总碳储量变化分别为270.99 t·ha−1、204.24 t·ha−1和224.82 t·ha−1。结果表明,安什拉瓦高海拔地区的碳储量大于孜巴低海拔地区的碳储量,两种森林的碳储量差异不显著。安什拉瓦森林的总碳储量沿坡度变化分别为392.60 t·ha−1、344.59 t·ha−1和295.49 t·ha−1,淄坝森林的平坡区、中坡区和陡坡区碳储量变化分别为258.74 t·ha−1、222.46 t·ha−1和171.46 t·ha−1。这导致两种森林在平坦的山坡上储存了更多的碳。此外,仅在梓坝遗址,沿坡度方向存在显著差异。在每个森林中,观察到8个不同的向面相,其中西部(W)向在两个森林中含有最高的总碳储量。另一方面,安什拉瓦和梓巴森林的南坡(S)和平坡(F)分别记录了较低的值。两种森林的坡向变化很大。结果表明,环境因子对呛山森林生态系统碳储量值有显著影响,但各碳库之间的影响并不一致。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
International Journal of Forestry Research
International Journal of Forestry Research Agricultural and Biological Sciences-Forestry
CiteScore
2.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
32
审稿时长
18 weeks
期刊介绍: International Journal of Forestry Research is a peer-reviewed, Open Access journal that publishes original research and review articles focusing on the management and conservation of trees or forests. The journal will consider articles looking at areas such as tree biodiversity, sustainability, and habitat protection, as well as social and economic aspects of forestry. Other topics covered include landscape protection, productive capacity, and forest health.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信