Colonization and confrontation of four Armillaria sinapina isolates to Armillaria ostoyae within inoculated wood blocks and stumps

IF 1.6 4区 农林科学 Q3 PLANT SCIENCES
M. Cruickshank
{"title":"Colonization and confrontation of four Armillaria sinapina isolates to Armillaria ostoyae within inoculated wood blocks and stumps","authors":"M. Cruickshank","doi":"10.1080/07060661.2023.2190165","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Roots represent a third of terrestrial biomass. After logging, fungal pathogens use stump roots as a food base to survive and this may result in negative impact on aboveground plant production. Mycelial spread determines the fungal volume in the stump, which in turn dictates inoculum potential and spread distance; hence, it is a key disease factor. The current study focuses on the spread and confrontation of two sympatric species of Armillaria with differing virulence. Living cut blocks of Douglas-fir stem were inoculated at opposite ends with a virulent Armillaria ostoyae isolate, or four A. sinapina isolates with low virulence from two biogeoclimatic zones. The inoculum blocks were buried in moist sand, and then the surface area and volume occupied by each was determined. The drier zone A. sinapina isolates colonized 80% of the block surface areas, while the moister zone isolates were about equal with A. ostoyae (42% colonized). Additionally, inoculum blocks of each species were buried against a root and root collar of two living trees, the trees were cut, and the stumps became colonized. One stump had greater A. ostoyae colonization over A. sinapina by 12%, and the other larger stump by 74% because of thicker root collar bark that hindered A. sinapina. All interspecific encounters produced a stalemate. Increased growth potential of A. sinapina in drier zones might enable root colonization before drying. Southern Canada is forecast to become drier and warmer, favouring A. ostoyae over A. sinapina in the currently more productive areas, with an increasing negative impact on aboveground productivity.","PeriodicalId":9468,"journal":{"name":"Canadian Journal of Plant Pathology","volume":"45 1","pages":"290 - 299"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2023-03-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Canadian Journal of Plant Pathology","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/07060661.2023.2190165","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PLANT SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract Roots represent a third of terrestrial biomass. After logging, fungal pathogens use stump roots as a food base to survive and this may result in negative impact on aboveground plant production. Mycelial spread determines the fungal volume in the stump, which in turn dictates inoculum potential and spread distance; hence, it is a key disease factor. The current study focuses on the spread and confrontation of two sympatric species of Armillaria with differing virulence. Living cut blocks of Douglas-fir stem were inoculated at opposite ends with a virulent Armillaria ostoyae isolate, or four A. sinapina isolates with low virulence from two biogeoclimatic zones. The inoculum blocks were buried in moist sand, and then the surface area and volume occupied by each was determined. The drier zone A. sinapina isolates colonized 80% of the block surface areas, while the moister zone isolates were about equal with A. ostoyae (42% colonized). Additionally, inoculum blocks of each species were buried against a root and root collar of two living trees, the trees were cut, and the stumps became colonized. One stump had greater A. ostoyae colonization over A. sinapina by 12%, and the other larger stump by 74% because of thicker root collar bark that hindered A. sinapina. All interspecific encounters produced a stalemate. Increased growth potential of A. sinapina in drier zones might enable root colonization before drying. Southern Canada is forecast to become drier and warmer, favouring A. ostoyae over A. sinapina in the currently more productive areas, with an increasing negative impact on aboveground productivity.
接种木块和树桩内4株sinapina蜜环菌对蜜环菌的定殖和对抗
摘要根占陆地生物量的三分之一。砍伐后,真菌病原体利用残根作为食物基础生存,这可能会对地上植物的生产产生负面影响。菌丝体的传播决定了树桩中的真菌体积,而真菌体积又决定了接种潜力和传播距离;因此,它是一个关键的疾病因素。目前的研究集中在两种具有不同毒力的同域蜜环菌的传播和对抗上。在花旗松茎的活切块的两端接种一个毒力强的奥斯托耶蜜环菌分离株,或来自两个生物地球气候区的四个毒力低的芥子菌分离株。将接种块埋在潮湿的沙子中,然后确定每个接种块所占的表面积和体积。干燥区的A.sinapina分离株定植于块表面积的80%,而湿润区的分离株与A.ostoyae(定植于42%)大致相等。此外,每个物种的接种块都埋在两棵活树的根和根颈上,树木被砍伐,树桩被定殖。其中一个树桩的A.ostoyae定植率比A.sinapina大12%,另一个更大的树桩的定植率高74%,因为较厚的根领树皮阻碍了A.sinapia的生长。所有种间的相遇都造成了僵局。芥子在干燥区生长潜力的增加可能使根系在干燥前定殖。据预测,加拿大南部将变得更加干燥和温暖,在目前生产力较高的地区,有利于A.ostoye而不是A.sinapina,对地上生产力的负面影响越来越大。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.50
自引率
5.00%
发文量
56
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Canadian Journal of Plant Pathology is an international journal which publishes the results of scientific research and other information relevant to the discipline of plant pathology as review papers, research articles, notes and disease reports. Papers may be submitted in English or French and are subject to peer review. Research articles and notes include original research that contributes to the science of plant pathology or to the practice of plant pathology, including the diagnosis, estimation, prevention, and control of plant diseases. Notes are generally shorter in length and include more concise research results. Disease reports are brief, previously unpublished accounts of diseases occurring on a new host or geographic region. Review papers include mini-reviews, descriptions of emerging technologies, and full reviews on a topic of interest to readers, including symposium papers. These papers will be highlighted in each issue of the journal and require prior discussion with the Editor-in-Chief prior to submission.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信