Against academic “resourcification”: collaboration as delinking from extractivist “area studies” paradigms

IF 1.3 Q2 ETHNIC STUDIES
Victoria Donovan
{"title":"Against academic “resourcification”: collaboration as delinking from extractivist “area studies” paradigms","authors":"Victoria Donovan","doi":"10.1080/00085006.2023.2200669","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT This article engages Asia Bazdyrieva’s idea of the “resourcification” of Ukraine – that is, the reduction of Ukraine in Soviet and Western geopolitical imaginations to a mere extraction resource – to develop and criticize the idea of “academic resourcification.” The author argues that Western researchers have often treated Ukrainian (and other non-Western) subjects as extraction resources, mining their expertise and knowledge, without acknowledging their agency or contributions in their work. The article argues for the decolonization of Western academic practice in the form of “delinking” from such exploitative and extractivist paradigms of knowledge production and instead aspiring, in the words of the decolonial scholar Walter Mignolo, to “thinking and doing otherwise.” Asking what it means to decolonize academia, the article turns for inspiration to Ukrainian decolonial researcher-artist-activists, considering the ways in which these individuals are modelling more equitable and ethical forms of knowledge production. The article ends by advocating collaborative methods – that is, the co-production of knowledge with local thinkers, rather than about them – as a productive model for Western scholars in their efforts to decolonize their research.","PeriodicalId":43356,"journal":{"name":"Canadian Slavonic Papers","volume":"65 1","pages":"163 - 173"},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2023-04-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Canadian Slavonic Papers","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/00085006.2023.2200669","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ETHNIC STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

ABSTRACT This article engages Asia Bazdyrieva’s idea of the “resourcification” of Ukraine – that is, the reduction of Ukraine in Soviet and Western geopolitical imaginations to a mere extraction resource – to develop and criticize the idea of “academic resourcification.” The author argues that Western researchers have often treated Ukrainian (and other non-Western) subjects as extraction resources, mining their expertise and knowledge, without acknowledging their agency or contributions in their work. The article argues for the decolonization of Western academic practice in the form of “delinking” from such exploitative and extractivist paradigms of knowledge production and instead aspiring, in the words of the decolonial scholar Walter Mignolo, to “thinking and doing otherwise.” Asking what it means to decolonize academia, the article turns for inspiration to Ukrainian decolonial researcher-artist-activists, considering the ways in which these individuals are modelling more equitable and ethical forms of knowledge production. The article ends by advocating collaborative methods – that is, the co-production of knowledge with local thinkers, rather than about them – as a productive model for Western scholars in their efforts to decolonize their research.
反对学术上的“资源化”:将合作与掠夺性的“区域研究”范式脱钩
摘要本文运用亚斯·巴兹德里耶娃的乌克兰“资源化”思想,即将苏联和西方地缘政治想象中的乌克兰缩小为纯粹的开采资源,对“学术资源化”的思想进行了发展和批判。“作者认为,西方研究人员经常将乌克兰(和其他非西方)主体视为开采资源,挖掘他们的专业知识和知识,而不承认他们在工作中的作用或贡献。这篇文章主张西方学术实践的非殖民化,其形式是与这种剥削性和榨取主义的知识生产范式“脱钩”,而不是用非殖民化学者Walter Mignolo的话来说,渴望“思考和做其他事情”,这篇文章的灵感来源于乌克兰非殖民化研究艺术家活动家,他们思考了这些人如何塑造更公平、更合乎道德的知识生产形式。文章最后提倡合作方法——即与当地思想家共同生产知识,而不是与他们合作——作为西方学者努力实现研究非殖民化的富有成效的模式。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Canadian Slavonic Papers
Canadian Slavonic Papers ETHNIC STUDIES-
CiteScore
1.10
自引率
25.00%
发文量
61
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信