Non-enhanced CT Maximum Intensity Projections for the Detection of Large Vessel Occlusions.

J. P. Ho, D. T. Nguyen, M. Pirastefahr, R. Narula, L. Hailey, M. Mortin, K. Rapp, K. Agrawal, Branko Huisa-Garate, R. Modir, D. Meyer, T. Hemmen, B. Meyer
{"title":"Non-enhanced CT Maximum Intensity Projections for the Detection of Large Vessel Occlusions.","authors":"J. P. Ho, D. T. Nguyen, M. Pirastefahr, R. Narula, L. Hailey, M. Mortin, K. Rapp, K. Agrawal, Branko Huisa-Garate, R. Modir, D. Meyer, T. Hemmen, B. Meyer","doi":"10.26420/AUSTINJCEREBROVASCDISSTROKE.2017.1068","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background\nIdentification of large vessel occlusions (LVO) is important with recent guidelines supporting endovascular therapy in selected acute ischemic stroke patients. Many stroke centers perform CT angiography (CTA) in patients with suspected LVO, however this requires additional time and contrast administration. Non-enhanced CT maximum intensity projection (NECT-MIPs) may offer a rapid alternative to CTA.\n\n\nMethods\nWe retrospectively reviewed acute stroke patients with LVO in the UCSD Stroke Registry, presenting between 6/2014-7/2016. NECT-MIPs were evaluated for presence of LVO. Gold standard comparison was to CTA. Results were stratified by level of training (Faculty, Fellow and Acute Care Practitioners [ACPs]). Inter-rater agreement was assessed using Fleiss' Kappa Coefficient.\n\n\nResults\nWe reviewed 24 patients using NECT-MIPs for the detection of LVO. Faculty had a sensitivity and specificity of 95% & 92% for ICA/M1, 42% & 100% for M2, and 67% & 96% for basilar occlusions. Fellows and ACPs had a sensitivity and specificity of 61% & 94% for ICA/M1, 19% & 83% for M2, and 75% & 95% for basilar occlusions. Inter-rater agreement among Faculty readers was k=0.75 for ICA/M1, k=0.79 for M2 and k=0.14 for basilar occlusions. Among Fellows and ACPs, k=0.57 for ICA/M1, k=0.40 for M2, and k=0.27 for basilar occlusions.\n\n\nConclusions\nNECT-MIPs have high sensitivity and specificity for the detection of LVO when compared to CTA. Inter-rater agreement is fair and higher amongst more experienced reviewers. These results suggest that NECT-MIPs may be helpful to streamline the identification of LVO and reduce door to needle and door to intervention times.","PeriodicalId":90444,"journal":{"name":"Austin journal of cerebrovascular disease & stroke","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-07-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Austin journal of cerebrovascular disease & stroke","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.26420/AUSTINJCEREBROVASCDISSTROKE.2017.1068","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

Background Identification of large vessel occlusions (LVO) is important with recent guidelines supporting endovascular therapy in selected acute ischemic stroke patients. Many stroke centers perform CT angiography (CTA) in patients with suspected LVO, however this requires additional time and contrast administration. Non-enhanced CT maximum intensity projection (NECT-MIPs) may offer a rapid alternative to CTA. Methods We retrospectively reviewed acute stroke patients with LVO in the UCSD Stroke Registry, presenting between 6/2014-7/2016. NECT-MIPs were evaluated for presence of LVO. Gold standard comparison was to CTA. Results were stratified by level of training (Faculty, Fellow and Acute Care Practitioners [ACPs]). Inter-rater agreement was assessed using Fleiss' Kappa Coefficient. Results We reviewed 24 patients using NECT-MIPs for the detection of LVO. Faculty had a sensitivity and specificity of 95% & 92% for ICA/M1, 42% & 100% for M2, and 67% & 96% for basilar occlusions. Fellows and ACPs had a sensitivity and specificity of 61% & 94% for ICA/M1, 19% & 83% for M2, and 75% & 95% for basilar occlusions. Inter-rater agreement among Faculty readers was k=0.75 for ICA/M1, k=0.79 for M2 and k=0.14 for basilar occlusions. Among Fellows and ACPs, k=0.57 for ICA/M1, k=0.40 for M2, and k=0.27 for basilar occlusions. Conclusions NECT-MIPs have high sensitivity and specificity for the detection of LVO when compared to CTA. Inter-rater agreement is fair and higher amongst more experienced reviewers. These results suggest that NECT-MIPs may be helpful to streamline the identification of LVO and reduce door to needle and door to intervention times.
非增强CT最大强度投影检测大血管闭塞。
背景大血管闭塞(LVO)的识别是重要的,最近的指南支持对选定的急性缺血性中风患者进行血管内治疗。许多中风中心对疑似LVO患者进行CT血管造影术(CTA),但这需要额外的时间和造影剂。非增强CT最大强度投影(NECT MIPs)可能为CTA提供一种快速的替代方案。方法我们回顾性回顾了2016年6月至7月在UCSD卒中登记处出现的LVO急性卒中患者。评估NECT MIPs是否存在LVO。金标准与CTA进行比较。结果按培训水平进行分层(教员、研究员和急性护理从业者[ACPs])。使用Fleiss’Kappa系数评估评分者之间的一致性。结果我们回顾了24例使用NECT MIPs检测LVO的患者。Faculty对ICA/M1的敏感性和特异性分别为95%和92%、42%和100%,对基底动脉闭塞的敏感性和特异度分别为67%和96%。研究员和ACP对ICA/M1、M2和基底动脉闭塞的敏感性和特异性分别为61%和94%、19%和83%以及75%和95%。教员读者之间的评分者间一致性为:ICA/M1为k=0.75,M2为k=0.79,基底动脉闭塞为k=0.14。在研究员和ACP中,ICA/M1的k=0.57,M2的k=0.40,基底动脉闭塞的k=0.27。结论与CTA相比,NECT-MIPs对LVO的检测具有较高的敏感性和特异性。评分者之间的一致性是公平的,在更有经验的评审员中更高。这些结果表明,NECT MIPs可能有助于简化LVO的识别,并减少门到针和门到干预的时间。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信