Evaluation of Scientific and Research Productions of Reproductive Health Graduates for social Accountability: An Auditory Study

Q3 Nursing
S. Hajian, Marzieh Bagherinia, F. Yazdani
{"title":"Evaluation of Scientific and Research Productions of Reproductive Health Graduates for social Accountability: An Auditory Study","authors":"S. Hajian, Marzieh Bagherinia, F. Yazdani","doi":"10.32598/jhnm.33.1.2333","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction: An educational system that responds to the needs of society, besides needs assessment and community-based education, should allocate part of its research to society’s needs and priorities. Objective: This study aims to evaluate the scientific and research products of reproductive health graduates in the field of social accountability in Iran. Materials and Methods: The present study was conducted as an auditory study on all submitted dissertations in the field of reproductive health from 6 schools of midwifery nursing in Iran from 2010 to 2021. The first outcome of this study was the evaluation of scientific and research products of reproductive health graduates in the field of social accountability and the second one was the evaluation of these dissertations in three levels of responsibility, responsiveness, and accountability. The standardized and localized social accountability scale was used to evaluate the social responsiveness of the dissertations. Descriptive statistics were used to summarize the data. Results: In this study, 235 PhD reproductive health dissertations were assessed. The obtained score for social accountability was 34.5 (range: 30-40). Regarding social responsiveness, the obtained score was 63.8 (range: 50-70), and regarding the social responsibility dimension, the obtained score was 90 (range: 70-100). Conclusion: It is necessary to qualitatively evaluate the titles and objectives of the dissertations in this field before their approval and implementation. It is increasingly emphasized to achieve the research priorities of the field and, more importantly, the logic of this research to meet the health needs of the target community.","PeriodicalId":36020,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Holistic Nursing and Midwifery","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Holistic Nursing and Midwifery","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.32598/jhnm.33.1.2333","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Nursing","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: An educational system that responds to the needs of society, besides needs assessment and community-based education, should allocate part of its research to society’s needs and priorities. Objective: This study aims to evaluate the scientific and research products of reproductive health graduates in the field of social accountability in Iran. Materials and Methods: The present study was conducted as an auditory study on all submitted dissertations in the field of reproductive health from 6 schools of midwifery nursing in Iran from 2010 to 2021. The first outcome of this study was the evaluation of scientific and research products of reproductive health graduates in the field of social accountability and the second one was the evaluation of these dissertations in three levels of responsibility, responsiveness, and accountability. The standardized and localized social accountability scale was used to evaluate the social responsiveness of the dissertations. Descriptive statistics were used to summarize the data. Results: In this study, 235 PhD reproductive health dissertations were assessed. The obtained score for social accountability was 34.5 (range: 30-40). Regarding social responsiveness, the obtained score was 63.8 (range: 50-70), and regarding the social responsibility dimension, the obtained score was 90 (range: 70-100). Conclusion: It is necessary to qualitatively evaluate the titles and objectives of the dissertations in this field before their approval and implementation. It is increasingly emphasized to achieve the research priorities of the field and, more importantly, the logic of this research to meet the health needs of the target community.
生殖健康专业毕业生社会责任的科研成果评价:听觉研究
导言:除了需要评估和以社区为基础的教育外,一个响应社会需要的教育系统应将其部分研究分配给社会需要和优先事项。目的:本研究旨在评价伊朗生殖健康专业毕业生在社会责任领域的科研成果。材料与方法:本研究对伊朗6所助产护理学院2010年至2021年在生殖健康领域提交的所有论文进行听觉研究。本研究的第一个结果是对生殖健康专业毕业生在社会责任领域的科研成果进行评价,第二个结果是在责任、响应和责任三个层面对这些学位论文进行评价。采用标准化本土化社会责任量表对论文的社会反应性进行评价。采用描述性统计对数据进行汇总。结果:本研究共对235篇生殖健康博士学位论文进行评估。社会责任得分为34.5分(范围:30-40)。社会反应性维度得分为63.8分(范围50-70),社会责任维度得分为90分(范围70-100)。结论:该领域的学位论文在批准和实施前,有必要对其题目和目标进行定性评价。它越来越强调实现该领域的研究重点,更重要的是,这项研究的逻辑,以满足目标社区的健康需求。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Holistic Nursing and Midwifery
Journal of Holistic Nursing and Midwifery Nursing-Maternity and Midwifery
CiteScore
0.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
36
审稿时长
53 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信