Productivity and cost assessment of two harvesting methods for medium-rotation poplar plantations

IF 1.8 3区 农林科学 Q2 FORESTRY
R. Spinelli, N. Magagnotti, Barnabas Kovacs, Patrik Heger, M. Mihelič
{"title":"Productivity and cost assessment of two harvesting methods for medium-rotation poplar plantations","authors":"R. Spinelli, N. Magagnotti, Barnabas Kovacs, Patrik Heger, M. Mihelič","doi":"10.1080/02827581.2023.2177336","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT The study compared the cut-to-length (CTL) and the whole-tree-harvesting (WTH) methods under two alternative log length specifications (2 m vs. 4 m) as deployed in the new medium-rotation poplar plantations. The goal of this study was to determine if any of the four combinations of harvesting method and log length incurred lower cost and/or better log yield than the others. The test was conducted in a 6-year-old plantation with a stocking between 30 and 60 bone-dry tons (BDT) per hectare. Each treatment was repeated 8 times – each repetition consisting of one sample plot with a 700 m2 surface area (115–130 trees). Researchers determined the mass obtained from each sample plot, as well as the time necessary to turn standing trees into logs and biomass piled at the landing. A calculator was developed for estimating harvesting costs as a function of variable machine rates. Under the conditions of the study, CTL harvesting into 4-m long logs was the most effective solution, because it offered a better log yield compared with WTH (60% vs. 50%) and incurred the same harvesting cost (∼ 33 € BDT−1). Shortening log length to 2 m determined a 25% increase of harvesting cost.","PeriodicalId":21352,"journal":{"name":"Scandinavian Journal of Forest Research","volume":"38 1","pages":"79 - 86"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2023-02-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Scandinavian Journal of Forest Research","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/02827581.2023.2177336","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"FORESTRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

ABSTRACT The study compared the cut-to-length (CTL) and the whole-tree-harvesting (WTH) methods under two alternative log length specifications (2 m vs. 4 m) as deployed in the new medium-rotation poplar plantations. The goal of this study was to determine if any of the four combinations of harvesting method and log length incurred lower cost and/or better log yield than the others. The test was conducted in a 6-year-old plantation with a stocking between 30 and 60 bone-dry tons (BDT) per hectare. Each treatment was repeated 8 times – each repetition consisting of one sample plot with a 700 m2 surface area (115–130 trees). Researchers determined the mass obtained from each sample plot, as well as the time necessary to turn standing trees into logs and biomass piled at the landing. A calculator was developed for estimating harvesting costs as a function of variable machine rates. Under the conditions of the study, CTL harvesting into 4-m long logs was the most effective solution, because it offered a better log yield compared with WTH (60% vs. 50%) and incurred the same harvesting cost (∼ 33 € BDT−1). Shortening log length to 2 m determined a 25% increase of harvesting cost.
中轮杨林两种采伐方式的生产力及成本评价
摘要:本研究比较了两种不同原木长度规格(2 m和4 m)下的切尺采伐(CTL)和整树采伐(WTH)方法在新中轮杨林中的应用。本研究的目的是确定采伐方法和原木长度的四种组合中是否有一种比其他组合成本更低和/或产量更高。试验在一个有6年树龄的人工林中进行,每公顷放养30至60干干吨(BDT)。每个处理重复8次,每次重复包括一个700 m2表面积的样地(115-130棵树)。研究人员确定了从每个样地获得的质量,以及将站立的树木变成原木和堆积在着陆处的生物质所需的时间。开发了一种计算器,用于估计作为可变机器率函数的收获成本。在本研究条件下,将CTL采伐成4米长的原木是最有效的解决方案,因为与WTH相比,它提供了更好的原木产量(60% vs 50%),并且采伐成本相同(~ 33€BDT−1)。将原木长度缩短至2米决定了采伐成本增加25%。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.00
自引率
5.60%
发文量
26
审稿时长
3.3 months
期刊介绍: The Scandinavian Journal of Forest Research is a leading international research journal with a focus on forests and forestry in boreal and temperate regions worldwide.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信