{"title":"What Is Race? Four Philosophers, Six Views","authors":"P. Msimang","doi":"10.1080/05568641.2022.2056072","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"I. The Structure of the Book What is Race? is one of the latest notable instalments in the metaphysics of race debate. In the first half of the book, each author presents their respective answers to the question ‘What is race?’. The second half of the book comprises of each author responding to their co-authors and defending their own views. This format is highly engaging. Seeing each author make their arguments, respond to their co-authors, and try meet the challenges set by their co-authors against their respective positions makes this work a great pedagogical tool and an exemplar of contemporary philosophical argumentation in the analytic tradition. The authors draw out the presuppositions that frame the race debate in ways that make apparent general semantic issues of reference and the challenges about which interpretive traditions contemporary accounts of race should follow. Despite these challenges, the text is not bogged down in a tangle of semantic disputes but rather tackles the metaphysical question of race using a range of argumentative strategies.","PeriodicalId":46780,"journal":{"name":"Philosophical Papers","volume":"51 1","pages":"115 - 145"},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Philosophical Papers","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/05568641.2022.2056072","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"PHILOSOPHY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2
Abstract
I. The Structure of the Book What is Race? is one of the latest notable instalments in the metaphysics of race debate. In the first half of the book, each author presents their respective answers to the question ‘What is race?’. The second half of the book comprises of each author responding to their co-authors and defending their own views. This format is highly engaging. Seeing each author make their arguments, respond to their co-authors, and try meet the challenges set by their co-authors against their respective positions makes this work a great pedagogical tool and an exemplar of contemporary philosophical argumentation in the analytic tradition. The authors draw out the presuppositions that frame the race debate in ways that make apparent general semantic issues of reference and the challenges about which interpretive traditions contemporary accounts of race should follow. Despite these challenges, the text is not bogged down in a tangle of semantic disputes but rather tackles the metaphysical question of race using a range of argumentative strategies.
期刊介绍:
Philosophical Papers is an international, generalist journal of philosophy edited in South Africa Original Articles: Articles appearing in regular issues are original, high-quality, and stand-alone, and are written for the general professional philosopher. Submissions are welcome in any area of philosophy and undergo a process of peer review based on initial editor screening and refereeing by (usually) two referees. Special Issues: Topic-based special issues are comprised of both invited and submitted papers selected by guest editors. Recent special issues have included ''Philosophy''s Therapeutic Potential'' (2014, editor Dylan Futter); ''Aging and the Elderly'' (2012, editors Tom Martin and Samantha Vice); ''The Problem of the Criterion'' (2011, editor Mark Nelson); ''Retributive Emotions'' (2010, editor Lucy Allais); ‘Rape and its Meaning/s’ (2009, editor Louise du Toit). Calls for papers for upcoming special issues can be found here. Ideas for future special issues are welcome.