Conceptions of Race Beyond North America: The Subversion of the Colonial Racial Contract in The Bahamas

D. Allens
{"title":"Conceptions of Race Beyond North America: The Subversion of the Colonial Racial Contract in The Bahamas","authors":"D. Allens","doi":"10.33137/caribbeanquilt.v5i0.34368","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In his work Ethnic groups and boundaries, Frederick Barth argues that applying definitions to group of peoples has less to do with emphasizing a shared culture than with defining the sentiments of communality in opposition to the perceived identity of an ‘other’ (Barth). In applying Barth’s framework, modern Bahamian identity has developed—and is largely understood—in comparison to a Haitian ‘other.' Therefore, this essay will argue that, having gone through multiple iterations of the racial contract, policies of subjugation initially intended for black colonial subjects (e.g. uneven development and colonially encouraged distrust) have been subverted for use by The Bahamas’ post-independence government against those with Haitian ancestry. It will demonstrate that Bahamian sentiments towards Haitians are contextualized historically and based on a long-standing colonial tradition of discrimination and social control that pitted West Indian immigrants against them. While this subjugation is no longer enforced along phenotypical lines, elements of privilege connected to the racial contract are now adjudicated along different lines that may prove harder to distinguish, perhaps making the privileges attached to the dominant identity different from a North American context.","PeriodicalId":34856,"journal":{"name":"Caribbean Quilt","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-05-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Caribbean Quilt","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.33137/caribbeanquilt.v5i0.34368","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In his work Ethnic groups and boundaries, Frederick Barth argues that applying definitions to group of peoples has less to do with emphasizing a shared culture than with defining the sentiments of communality in opposition to the perceived identity of an ‘other’ (Barth). In applying Barth’s framework, modern Bahamian identity has developed—and is largely understood—in comparison to a Haitian ‘other.' Therefore, this essay will argue that, having gone through multiple iterations of the racial contract, policies of subjugation initially intended for black colonial subjects (e.g. uneven development and colonially encouraged distrust) have been subverted for use by The Bahamas’ post-independence government against those with Haitian ancestry. It will demonstrate that Bahamian sentiments towards Haitians are contextualized historically and based on a long-standing colonial tradition of discrimination and social control that pitted West Indian immigrants against them. While this subjugation is no longer enforced along phenotypical lines, elements of privilege connected to the racial contract are now adjudicated along different lines that may prove harder to distinguish, perhaps making the privileges attached to the dominant identity different from a North American context.
北美以外的种族观念:巴哈马群岛殖民种族契约的颠覆
弗雷德里克·巴特(Frederick Barth)在他的著作《族群与边界》(Ethnic groups and boundaries)中认为,将定义应用于一群人,与其说是强调一种共同的文化,不如说是定义一种与感知到的“他者”身份相对的集体情感(巴特)。在运用巴思的框架时,现代巴哈马人的身份与海地的“他者”相比得到了发展,并且在很大程度上得到了理解。因此,本文将论证,在经历了种族契约的多次迭代之后,最初针对黑人殖民地主体的征服政策(例如,不平衡的发展和殖民地鼓励的不信任)已经被巴哈马独立后的政府用来对付海地血统的人。它将表明,巴哈马人对海地人的感情是有历史背景的,其基础是西印度移民与他们对立的歧视和社会控制的长期殖民传统。虽然这种征服不再按照表现性的方式来执行,但与种族契约相关的特权元素现在按照不同的方式来裁决,这可能会证明更难区分,也许会使附属于主导身份的特权与北美背景不同。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
34
审稿时长
20 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信