Investigation of Microbial Etiology in Endotracheal Aspirate Samples of Severe Pneumonia Patients by Multiplex PCR and Culture Method

IF 0.3 Q3 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
Taliha Karakök, S. Cesur, Esra Kaya-Kılıç, Melih Gaffar Gözükara, A. E. Karakoç, H. Başar, S. Kınıklı
{"title":"Investigation of Microbial Etiology in Endotracheal Aspirate Samples of Severe Pneumonia Patients by Multiplex PCR and Culture Method","authors":"Taliha Karakök, S. Cesur, Esra Kaya-Kılıç, Melih Gaffar Gözükara, A. E. Karakoç, H. Başar, S. Kınıklı","doi":"10.36519/kd.2022.4004","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objectives: The probability of detecting viral and atypical agents in pneumonia patients has increased with the molecular methods used in recent years. We aimed to investigate pneumonia pathogens in endotracheal aspiration samples (ETA) of patients with severe community-acquired (CAP), hospital-acquired pneumonia (HAP), and ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP) by multiplex polymerase chain reaction (m-PCR) and culture method.\n\nMethods: A prospective study was performed between December 2019 and October 2020. Patients 18 years and older with pneumonia followed in ICU on the mechanical ventilator were included. COVID-19 patients were excluded. Patients were grouped as CAP, HAP, and VAP. Two ETA samples were obtained from patients within 48 hours of the pneumonia diagnosis. Respiratory pathogens were investigated in samples by viral-bacterial m-PCR and bacterial culture methods.\n\nResults: 74 patients were included in the study. m-PCR of ETA samples achieved pathogen detection in 87.8% of patients compared with 58.1% with culture methods. The most common pathogen detected by m-PCR was Streptococcus pneumoniae in both CAP and HAP patients and Klebsiella spp. in VAP patients. The most common pathogen isolated by culture was Staphylococcus aureus in both CAP and HAP patients and Klebsiella spp. in VAP patients. Atypical pneumonia pathogens were positive for 14.9% of the patients. Atypical pathogens were recovered from 28.5% of CAP patients and 23.1% of HAP patients. Viruses constituted all of the atypical pathogens recovered from HAP patients. No atypical pathogen was found in VAP patients.\n\nConclusion: In this study, S. pneumoniae was the most common pathogen detected with m-PCR, and S. aureus and Klebsiella spp. were the most common pathogens detected with culture. Determination of microbial etiology of lower respiratory tract samples by molecular methods for diagnosing severe CAP and HAP may be beneficial in terms of treatment.\n\nKeywords: pneumonia, multiplex PCR, endotracheal aspirate, conventional methods","PeriodicalId":44309,"journal":{"name":"Klimik Journal","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.3000,"publicationDate":"2022-09-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Klimik Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.36519/kd.2022.4004","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: The probability of detecting viral and atypical agents in pneumonia patients has increased with the molecular methods used in recent years. We aimed to investigate pneumonia pathogens in endotracheal aspiration samples (ETA) of patients with severe community-acquired (CAP), hospital-acquired pneumonia (HAP), and ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP) by multiplex polymerase chain reaction (m-PCR) and culture method. Methods: A prospective study was performed between December 2019 and October 2020. Patients 18 years and older with pneumonia followed in ICU on the mechanical ventilator were included. COVID-19 patients were excluded. Patients were grouped as CAP, HAP, and VAP. Two ETA samples were obtained from patients within 48 hours of the pneumonia diagnosis. Respiratory pathogens were investigated in samples by viral-bacterial m-PCR and bacterial culture methods. Results: 74 patients were included in the study. m-PCR of ETA samples achieved pathogen detection in 87.8% of patients compared with 58.1% with culture methods. The most common pathogen detected by m-PCR was Streptococcus pneumoniae in both CAP and HAP patients and Klebsiella spp. in VAP patients. The most common pathogen isolated by culture was Staphylococcus aureus in both CAP and HAP patients and Klebsiella spp. in VAP patients. Atypical pneumonia pathogens were positive for 14.9% of the patients. Atypical pathogens were recovered from 28.5% of CAP patients and 23.1% of HAP patients. Viruses constituted all of the atypical pathogens recovered from HAP patients. No atypical pathogen was found in VAP patients. Conclusion: In this study, S. pneumoniae was the most common pathogen detected with m-PCR, and S. aureus and Klebsiella spp. were the most common pathogens detected with culture. Determination of microbial etiology of lower respiratory tract samples by molecular methods for diagnosing severe CAP and HAP may be beneficial in terms of treatment. Keywords: pneumonia, multiplex PCR, endotracheal aspirate, conventional methods
多重PCR与培养法对重症肺炎患者气管内吸入标本微生物病原学的研究
目的:近年来,分子检测方法在肺炎患者中检测出病毒和非典型病原体的可能性越来越大。目的采用多重聚合酶链式反应(m-PCR)和培养法对重症社区获得性肺炎(CAP)、医院获得性肺炎(HAP)和呼吸机相关性肺炎(VAP)患者气管内吸入样本(ETA)中的肺炎病原体进行研究。方法:前瞻性研究于2019年12月至2020年10月进行。纳入18岁及以上在ICU接受机械呼吸机随访的肺炎患者。排除COVID-19患者。将患者分为CAP、HAP和VAP。在肺炎诊断后48小时内从患者中获得2份ETA样本。采用病毒-细菌m-PCR法和细菌培养法对呼吸道病原菌进行检测。结果:74例患者纳入研究。ETA样品m-PCR检出率为87.8%,而培养法检出率为58.1%。在CAP和HAP患者中,m-PCR检出最多的病原体是肺炎链球菌,在VAP患者中检出最多的病原体是克雷伯氏菌。在CAP和HAP患者中最常见的病原菌是金黄色葡萄球菌,在VAP患者中最常见的病原菌是克雷伯氏菌。非典型肺炎病原菌阳性率为14.9%。非典型病原体检出率分别为28.5%和23.1%。从HAP患者身上检出的非典型病原体均为病毒。VAP患者未发现非典型病原体。结论:本研究中,m-PCR检出最多的病原菌为肺炎链球菌,培养检出最多的病原菌为金黄色葡萄球菌和克雷伯氏菌。应用分子方法检测下呼吸道微生物病原学诊断重症CAP和HAP可能有助于治疗。关键词:肺炎,多重PCR,气管内吸出,常规方法
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Klimik Journal
Klimik Journal MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL-
CiteScore
0.60
自引率
33.30%
发文量
39
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信