{"title":"“Better place no wit can finde”: The Compiler as Author in Early Modern Verse Miscellanies","authors":"Angelika Zirker","doi":"10.21825/authorship.85738","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper reflects on concepts of early modern authorship during the early modern period based on miscellanies and the roles of their compilors. The statement \"I Compyle: I make a boke as an auctor doth\" from Palsgrave’s Dictionary of French and English serves as a starting point: here, the compiler becomes a co-creative agent in that he plays with identities in composing the collection of poetry as much as with concepts and notions of individuality and community. This will be illustrated on the basis of a single poem, \"Harpalus‘ Complaint\" from Tottel’s Miscellany (1557) up unto the second edition of Englands Helicon (1614). A variety of interaction between several roles can be observed: compilors become co-authors themselves but also do readers when poems are newly arranged and integrated into a narrative. While Tottel’s Miscellany plays with identities and attributions, in Englands Helicon the (re)contextualisation of poems within newly created narratives is central. The paper thus shows that concepts of authorship around 1600 go beyond our contemporary notions that are often based on ideas of the creative genius: compilation becomes authorial business, and is creative.","PeriodicalId":30455,"journal":{"name":"Authorship","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-02-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Authorship","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21825/authorship.85738","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Arts and Humanities","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
This paper reflects on concepts of early modern authorship during the early modern period based on miscellanies and the roles of their compilors. The statement "I Compyle: I make a boke as an auctor doth" from Palsgrave’s Dictionary of French and English serves as a starting point: here, the compiler becomes a co-creative agent in that he plays with identities in composing the collection of poetry as much as with concepts and notions of individuality and community. This will be illustrated on the basis of a single poem, "Harpalus‘ Complaint" from Tottel’s Miscellany (1557) up unto the second edition of Englands Helicon (1614). A variety of interaction between several roles can be observed: compilors become co-authors themselves but also do readers when poems are newly arranged and integrated into a narrative. While Tottel’s Miscellany plays with identities and attributions, in Englands Helicon the (re)contextualisation of poems within newly created narratives is central. The paper thus shows that concepts of authorship around 1600 go beyond our contemporary notions that are often based on ideas of the creative genius: compilation becomes authorial business, and is creative.
本文从杂记及其编者的角色出发,反思了近代早期作者的概念。《帕斯格雷夫法语和英语词典》中的一句话“I Compyle: I make a book as a auctor”可以作为一个起点:在这里,编译者成为了一个共同创造的代理人,因为他在创作诗集的过程中扮演着身份的角色,同时也扮演着个性和社区的概念和观念。这将在托特尔的《杂记》(1557)至《英国Helicon》(1614)第二版的一首诗《哈帕洛斯的抱怨》的基础上加以说明。我们可以观察到不同角色之间的各种互动:当诗歌被重新编排并整合到一个叙事中时,编纂者自己成为共同作者,但也成为读者。当托特尔的《杂记》在身份和归属方面发挥作用时,在《英格兰螺旋》中,诗歌在新创作的叙事中(重新)语境化是核心。因此,本文表明,1600年左右的作者概念超越了我们当代的概念,这些概念通常基于创造性天才的想法:编辑成为作者的业务,并且是创造性的。