Introduction—Alternative/Mainstream

IF 0.1 4区 社会学 0 HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY
Luke Bresky
{"title":"Introduction—Alternative/Mainstream","authors":"Luke Bresky","doi":"10.3138/cras-2022-001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Association for American Studies Conference held in the fall of 2018; the Call for Papers lured and confronted participants with a range of potential definitions, deployments, instances, convergences, contestations, and juxtapositions of the alternative and the mainstream in all branches of US culture. At the most general, practical level, the theme itself offered a mainstream platform for multidisciplinary discussions. What could be more habitual to scholars in American Studies than the critical assessment of alternatives, real or imagined, under diverse topical or methodological headings? In one form or another, the antithetical categories we designate as alternative and mainstream have figured centrally in American Studies from the field’s institutional beginnings in the late 1950s onwards. At a more specific, timely level, as Elizabeth Jameson details helpfully in an auto-historical reflection based on her memorable conference plenary, the CFP found its immediate provocation in the phrase “alternative facts,” which reverberated symptomatically (however absurdly) for many months after Trump adviser Kellyanne Conway uttered it to defend misleading statements by White House Press Secretary Sean Spicer in January 2017.","PeriodicalId":53953,"journal":{"name":"CANADIAN REVIEW OF AMERICAN STUDIES","volume":"52 1","pages":"104 - 97"},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2022-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"CANADIAN REVIEW OF AMERICAN STUDIES","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3138/cras-2022-001","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Association for American Studies Conference held in the fall of 2018; the Call for Papers lured and confronted participants with a range of potential definitions, deployments, instances, convergences, contestations, and juxtapositions of the alternative and the mainstream in all branches of US culture. At the most general, practical level, the theme itself offered a mainstream platform for multidisciplinary discussions. What could be more habitual to scholars in American Studies than the critical assessment of alternatives, real or imagined, under diverse topical or methodological headings? In one form or another, the antithetical categories we designate as alternative and mainstream have figured centrally in American Studies from the field’s institutional beginnings in the late 1950s onwards. At a more specific, timely level, as Elizabeth Jameson details helpfully in an auto-historical reflection based on her memorable conference plenary, the CFP found its immediate provocation in the phrase “alternative facts,” which reverberated symptomatically (however absurdly) for many months after Trump adviser Kellyanne Conway uttered it to defend misleading statements by White House Press Secretary Sean Spicer in January 2017.
Introduction-Alternative /主流
2018年秋季举行的美国研究协会会议;论文征集吸引并面对参与者一系列潜在的定义、部署、实例、融合、争论,以及在美国文化的所有分支中替代和主流的并列。在最一般、最实际的层面上,这一主题本身为多学科讨论提供了一个主流平台。对于美国研究的学者来说,还有什么比在不同的主题或方法标题下对真实或想象的替代方案进行批判性评估更习惯的呢?以这样或那样的形式,我们称之为另类和主流的对立范畴,从20世纪50年代末该领域的制度开端开始,就在美国研究中占据了中心地位。在更具体、更及时的层面上,正如伊丽莎白·詹姆森(Elizabeth Jameson)在她令人难忘的会议全体会议上进行的自我历史反思中所详述的那样,CFP发现了“另类事实”这一短语的直接挑衅。2017年1月,特朗普的顾问凯莉安·康威(Kellyanne Conway)在为白宫新闻秘书肖恩·斯派塞(Sean Spicer)的误导性言论辩护时使用了这一短语,此后的几个月里,这一短语产生了明显的反响(无论多么荒谬)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CANADIAN REVIEW OF AMERICAN STUDIES
CANADIAN REVIEW OF AMERICAN STUDIES HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY-
CiteScore
0.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
26
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信