What’s Soil Got to Do with Climate Change?

Q1 Earth and Planetary Sciences
GSA Today Pub Date : 2022-03-01 DOI:10.1130/gsatg519a.1
T. Longbottom, Leila Wahab, Kyungjin Min, Anna K. Jurusik, K. Moreland, M. Dolui, Touyee Thao, Melinda Gonzales, Yulissa Rojas, J. Alvarez, Zachary Malone, Jielu Yan, T. Ghezzehei, A. Berhe
{"title":"What’s Soil Got to Do with Climate Change?","authors":"T. Longbottom, Leila Wahab, Kyungjin Min, Anna K. Jurusik, K. Moreland, M. Dolui, Touyee Thao, Melinda Gonzales, Yulissa Rojas, J. Alvarez, Zachary Malone, Jielu Yan, T. Ghezzehei, A. Berhe","doi":"10.1130/gsatg519a.1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Soils are the foundation of life on land and represent one of the largest global carbon (C) reservoirs. Because of the vast amount of C that they store and the continu-ous fluxes of C with the atmosphere, soil can either be part of the solution or problem with respect to climate change. Using a bank account analogy, the size and signifi-cance of the soil organic C (SOC) pool is best understood as the balance between inputs (deposits) from net primary produc-tivity and outputs (withdrawals) from SOC through decay and/or physical transport. Reversing the current problematic trend of increasing concentration of greenhouse gases in the atmosphere must be met with reduced fossil fuel emissions. At the same time, we argue that “climate-smart” land management can promote both terrestrial sequestration of atmospheric carbon dioxide (CO 2 ) and contribute to improving soil health and benefits. In this review, we highlight environments that are particularly vulnerable to SOC destabilization via land use and climatic factors and outline existing and emerging strategies that use soils to address anthropogenic climate change. Here, three contrasting eco- systems reveal differing SOC richness and dynamics: (A) agricultural, (B) grassland/shrubland, and (C) forested. Conventional agriculture (A) often leads to lower carbon stocks, and overall, less carbon input to the soil carbon pool. Grasslands (B) can harbor plants with deeper and more extensive root systems, medium to high amounts of SOC stock, and greater carbon inputs to the SOC pool. Forests (C) can have the deepest rooting system, a high amount of soil C stock, greatest density of mineral-associated C, and high rate of input of C to soils. Overall, organo-mineral association(s) and SOC pool is a function of the “balance” of C inputs and outputs in the soil organic carbon “bank account.”","PeriodicalId":35784,"journal":{"name":"GSA Today","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"GSA Today","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1130/gsatg519a.1","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Earth and Planetary Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Soils are the foundation of life on land and represent one of the largest global carbon (C) reservoirs. Because of the vast amount of C that they store and the continu-ous fluxes of C with the atmosphere, soil can either be part of the solution or problem with respect to climate change. Using a bank account analogy, the size and signifi-cance of the soil organic C (SOC) pool is best understood as the balance between inputs (deposits) from net primary produc-tivity and outputs (withdrawals) from SOC through decay and/or physical transport. Reversing the current problematic trend of increasing concentration of greenhouse gases in the atmosphere must be met with reduced fossil fuel emissions. At the same time, we argue that “climate-smart” land management can promote both terrestrial sequestration of atmospheric carbon dioxide (CO 2 ) and contribute to improving soil health and benefits. In this review, we highlight environments that are particularly vulnerable to SOC destabilization via land use and climatic factors and outline existing and emerging strategies that use soils to address anthropogenic climate change. Here, three contrasting eco- systems reveal differing SOC richness and dynamics: (A) agricultural, (B) grassland/shrubland, and (C) forested. Conventional agriculture (A) often leads to lower carbon stocks, and overall, less carbon input to the soil carbon pool. Grasslands (B) can harbor plants with deeper and more extensive root systems, medium to high amounts of SOC stock, and greater carbon inputs to the SOC pool. Forests (C) can have the deepest rooting system, a high amount of soil C stock, greatest density of mineral-associated C, and high rate of input of C to soils. Overall, organo-mineral association(s) and SOC pool is a function of the “balance” of C inputs and outputs in the soil organic carbon “bank account.”
土壤与气候变化有什么关系?
土壤是陆地生命的基础,也是全球最大的碳(C)储存库之一。由于它们储存了大量的碳,并且碳在大气中不断流动,土壤既可以成为解决气候变化问题的一部分,也可以成为问题的一部分。利用银行账户的类比,土壤有机碳(SOC)库的规模和重要性最好理解为来自净初级生产力的投入(存款)和通过腐烂和/或物理运输的SOC产出(提取)之间的平衡。要扭转目前大气中温室气体浓度增加的问题趋势,必须减少化石燃料的排放。同时,我们认为“气候智慧型”土地管理既可以促进大气中二氧化碳(CO 2)的陆地封存,又有助于改善土壤健康和效益。在这篇综述中,我们强调了特别容易受到土地利用和气候因素影响的土壤有机碳不稳定的环境,并概述了利用土壤来应对人为气候变化的现有和新兴策略。在这里,三种不同的生态系统显示出不同的有机碳丰富度和动态:(A)农业,(B)草地/灌丛,和(C)森林。传统农业(A)通常导致较低的碳储量,总体而言,较少的碳输入到土壤碳库。草地(B)具有较深、较粗放的根系、中高的有机碳储量和较大的碳库输入量的植物。森林(C)具有最深的根系系统、大量的土壤C储量、最大的矿物相关C密度和高的土壤C输入率。总体而言,有机矿物关联和有机碳库是土壤有机碳“银行账户”中碳输入和输出“平衡”的函数。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
GSA Today
GSA Today Earth and Planetary Sciences-Geology
CiteScore
4.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
20
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信