A call for standardized national guidelines on QT/QTc monitoring in Canada

Kathleen Hutton, D. Hutton
{"title":"A call for standardized national guidelines on QT/QTc monitoring in Canada","authors":"Kathleen Hutton, D. Hutton","doi":"10.5737/23688653-3221419","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: With QT-prolonging drugs being trialed for the treatment of COVID-19, national health associations allude to the importance of proficient QT interval assessment. However, in Canada there is no policy in place that clearly identifies a single method for routine QT monitoring. Aim: To demonstrate the need for a clear Canadian guideline for the measurement of the QT/QTc interval and to advocate for a standardized approach to education. Methods: This paper uses a medical anthropological approach to scale this practice gap from the individual provider to the institutions that govern practice and education. Nurses and emergency medical personnel from hospitals across Canada were polled with questionnaires on their confidence and knowledge of assessing the QT/QTc interval. We seek to identify causes for the widespread lack of confidence that goes beyond the context of nursing and is interdisciplinary in nature. Findings: Of the 292 participants who were polled, roughly 75% report measuring the QT interval. However, more than 50% of participants are not confident in their measurement. Although critical care nurses report the highest levels of confidence, the rate of correct answers amongst the whole of participants on knowledge-based questions is shockingly low (only nine percent attempted to provide a value for the QTc; 34% of those who were unsure of the normal QTc say they were not taught). Ninety percent of participants report they do not analyze the QTc, with critical care nurses accounting for 34% of participants. Conclusion: The lack of consensus on a QTc formula and the absence of clear guidelines on this well-documented issue exacerbate the continued gap in practice observed in our findings. We urge leading organizations to create a national guideline that supports a standardized approach to QT/QTc measurement that can be taught to and used by not only critical care nurses, but everyone in healthcare who provides cardiac monitoring.","PeriodicalId":91413,"journal":{"name":"The Canadian journal of critical care nursing","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-07-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Canadian journal of critical care nursing","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5737/23688653-3221419","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: With QT-prolonging drugs being trialed for the treatment of COVID-19, national health associations allude to the importance of proficient QT interval assessment. However, in Canada there is no policy in place that clearly identifies a single method for routine QT monitoring. Aim: To demonstrate the need for a clear Canadian guideline for the measurement of the QT/QTc interval and to advocate for a standardized approach to education. Methods: This paper uses a medical anthropological approach to scale this practice gap from the individual provider to the institutions that govern practice and education. Nurses and emergency medical personnel from hospitals across Canada were polled with questionnaires on their confidence and knowledge of assessing the QT/QTc interval. We seek to identify causes for the widespread lack of confidence that goes beyond the context of nursing and is interdisciplinary in nature. Findings: Of the 292 participants who were polled, roughly 75% report measuring the QT interval. However, more than 50% of participants are not confident in their measurement. Although critical care nurses report the highest levels of confidence, the rate of correct answers amongst the whole of participants on knowledge-based questions is shockingly low (only nine percent attempted to provide a value for the QTc; 34% of those who were unsure of the normal QTc say they were not taught). Ninety percent of participants report they do not analyze the QTc, with critical care nurses accounting for 34% of participants. Conclusion: The lack of consensus on a QTc formula and the absence of clear guidelines on this well-documented issue exacerbate the continued gap in practice observed in our findings. We urge leading organizations to create a national guideline that supports a standardized approach to QT/QTc measurement that can be taught to and used by not only critical care nurses, but everyone in healthcare who provides cardiac monitoring.
呼吁在加拿大制定标准化的QT/QTc监测国家指南
背景:随着QT-生产药物用于治疗新冠肺炎的试验,国家卫生协会暗示了熟练的QT间期评估的重要性。然而,在加拿大,没有明确确定常规QT监测单一方法的政策。目的:证明加拿大需要一个明确的QT/QTc间期测量指南,并倡导一种标准化的教育方法。方法:本文采用医学人类学的方法来衡量从个体提供者到管理实践和教育的机构的实践差距。来自加拿大各地医院的护士和急救医务人员接受了问卷调查,了解他们对评估QT/QTc间期的信心和知识。我们试图找出普遍缺乏信心的原因,这种情况超出了护理的范畴,本质上是跨学科的。调查结果:在接受调查的292名参与者中,大约75%的人报告测量了QT间期。然而,超过50%的参与者对自己的测量没有信心。尽管重症监护护士报告的信心水平最高,但所有参与者对基于知识的问题的正确回答率却低得惊人(只有9%的人试图提供QTc的值;34%不确定正常QTc的人表示他们没有接受过教育)。90%的参与者表示他们没有分析QTc,重症监护护士占参与者的34%。结论:在QTc公式上缺乏共识,并且在这个有充分证据的问题上缺乏明确的指导方针,这加剧了我们研究结果中观察到的实践中的持续差距。我们敦促主要组织制定一项国家指南,支持QT/QTc测量的标准化方法,不仅可以向重症监护护士教授,也可以向提供心脏监测的医疗保健人员教授和使用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信