Study on the construction of general index system of talent construction project in Shanghai Health System

中华医学科研管理杂志 Pub Date : 2019-02-21 DOI:10.3760/CMA.J.ISSN.1006-1924.2019.01.014

Nana Liu, Zhaoxin Wang, Jianwei Shi, Xinyu Hong, Junling Shi, Ping Zu, Ping Xiao

{"title":"Study on the construction of general index system of talent construction project in Shanghai Health System","authors":"Nana Liu, Zhaoxin Wang, Jianwei Shi, Xinyu Hong, Junling Shi, Ping Zu, Ping Xiao","doi":"10.3760/CMA.J.ISSN.1006-1924.2019.01.014","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective \nTo formulate the evaluation criteria for micro-appraisal of comprehensive talents and macro-evaluation of projects. \n \n \nMethods \nA total of 425 articles were included in the meta-analysis of literature review; Delphi's panel that involved 20 experts, 2 rounds of questionnaire surveys were conducted to construct indicators for comprehensive evaluation of talent construction projects; AHP was used to calculate the index weight coefficients for each category of indicators. \n \n \nResults \nThe talent construction project evaluation system includes two sub-systems: micro-evaluation of talents and macro-evaluation of projects. Among them, the talent micro-evaluation system, which includes 12 evaluation indicators, carries out assessments in terms of basic qualities, academic accomplishments, and research achievements. the macro-evaluation system of the project, include a total of 15 evaluation indicators, is mainly assessed from the macro level of project operations—project structure, project process, project results. \n \n \nConclusions \nFrom the perspective of the combination of micro (human resources) and macro (projects), to build a universal index for comprehensive evaluation of talent construction projects, both for the evaluation of the project, but also to conduct a comprehensive evaluation of the training object. \n \n \nKey words: \nTalent construction project; Literature meta-analysis; Delphi method; Analytic hierarchy process; Evaluation index","PeriodicalId":59555,"journal":{"name":"中华医学科研管理杂志","volume":"32 1","pages":"60-63"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-02-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"中华医学科研管理杂志","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3760/CMA.J.ISSN.1006-1924.2019.01.014","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective To formulate the evaluation criteria for micro-appraisal of comprehensive talents and macro-evaluation of projects. Methods A total of 425 articles were included in the meta-analysis of literature review; Delphi's panel that involved 20 experts, 2 rounds of questionnaire surveys were conducted to construct indicators for comprehensive evaluation of talent construction projects; AHP was used to calculate the index weight coefficients for each category of indicators. Results The talent construction project evaluation system includes two sub-systems: micro-evaluation of talents and macro-evaluation of projects. Among them, the talent micro-evaluation system, which includes 12 evaluation indicators, carries out assessments in terms of basic qualities, academic accomplishments, and research achievements. the macro-evaluation system of the project, include a total of 15 evaluation indicators, is mainly assessed from the macro level of project operations—project structure, project process, project results. Conclusions From the perspective of the combination of micro (human resources) and macro (projects), to build a universal index for comprehensive evaluation of talent construction projects, both for the evaluation of the project, but also to conduct a comprehensive evaluation of the training object. Key words: Talent construction project; Literature meta-analysis; Delphi method; Analytic hierarchy process; Evaluation index

查看原文本刊更多论文

上海市卫生系统人才建设工程总体指标体系构建研究

目的制定综合人才微观评价和项目宏观评价的评价标准。方法文献综述meta分析共纳入425篇文献;采用20名专家组成的德尔菲专家组，进行2轮问卷调查，构建人才建设项目综合评价指标;采用层次分析法计算各指标类别的指标权重系数。结果人才建设项目评价体系包括人才微观评价和项目宏观评价两个子系统。其中，人才微观评价体系包括12个评价指标，从基本素质、学术成就、研究成果等方面进行评价。项目宏观评价体系共包括15个评价指标，主要从项目运营宏观层面——项目结构、项目过程、项目结果进行评价。从微观(人力资源)与宏观(项目)相结合的角度，构建人才建设项目综合评价的通用指标，既对项目进行评价，又对培养对象进行综合评价。关键词:人才建设工程;文献分析;德尔菲法;层次分析法;评价指标

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

求助全文

约1分钟内获得全文求助全文

来源期刊

中华医学科研管理杂志

自引率

0.00%

发文量

3322