{"title":"Paul, the Gift and Philippians","authors":"W. Willis","doi":"10.1163/18712207-12341396","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\nThis paper employs a basic insight from John M. G. Barclay’s book, Paul and the Gift, that the word χάρις in first-century Greek very often referred to a gift, especially his “perfection” of the word as “conditional.” In Paul’s lifetime the common cultural expectation was that the recipient of a gift accepted that a return gift was normative and expected—whether physical or not. This understanding is thoroughly discussed in Seneca, De Beneficiis which describes how the obligation to reciprocity in giving and receiving is expected of all civil persons, apart from civic position and status. This is because the function of a gift is the building or maintaining of relationships. This purpose is shown to be the case also in Philippians with reference to the passage employing the lexeme (Phil 1:7, 29; 2:6-11) and in 4:10-20 where Paul discusses the gift he received from the Philippian church.","PeriodicalId":40398,"journal":{"name":"Horizons in Biblical Theology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2019-09-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1163/18712207-12341396","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Horizons in Biblical Theology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1163/18712207-12341396","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"RELIGION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
This paper employs a basic insight from John M. G. Barclay’s book, Paul and the Gift, that the word χάρις in first-century Greek very often referred to a gift, especially his “perfection” of the word as “conditional.” In Paul’s lifetime the common cultural expectation was that the recipient of a gift accepted that a return gift was normative and expected—whether physical or not. This understanding is thoroughly discussed in Seneca, De Beneficiis which describes how the obligation to reciprocity in giving and receiving is expected of all civil persons, apart from civic position and status. This is because the function of a gift is the building or maintaining of relationships. This purpose is shown to be the case also in Philippians with reference to the passage employing the lexeme (Phil 1:7, 29; 2:6-11) and in 4:10-20 where Paul discusses the gift he received from the Philippian church.
本文采用了约翰·m·g·巴克莱(John M. G. Barclay)的著作《保罗与礼物》(Paul and the Gift)中的一个基本观点,即在一世纪的希腊语中,χ ρις这个词经常指代礼物,尤其是他将这个词的“完美”修饰为“有条件的”。在保罗的一生中,普遍的文化期望是,接受礼物的人接受回报礼物是规范和期望的——无论是物质的还是非物质的。这种理解在塞内卡的《论受益》一书中得到了深入的讨论,书中描述了所有公民在给予和接受时的互惠义务是如何被期望的,除了公民的地位和地位。这是因为礼物的功能是建立或维持关系。这个目的在腓立比书中也被证明是这样的,参考了使用词素的段落(腓1:7,29;2:6-11)和4:10-20,保罗讨论他从腓立比教会得到的礼物。