VALIDITY OF DIFFUSION WEIGHTED MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING AND APPARENT DIFFUSION COEFFICIENT MAP IN DIFFERENTIATING BENIGN FROM MALIGNANT UTERINE ENDOMETRIAL PATHOLOGIES

Marwa Majid Al-Adhab, Salam M. Joori, Enam Azez Al-Tameemi
{"title":"VALIDITY OF DIFFUSION WEIGHTED MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING AND APPARENT DIFFUSION COEFFICIENT MAP IN DIFFERENTIATING BENIGN FROM MALIGNANT UTERINE ENDOMETRIAL PATHOLOGIES","authors":"Marwa Majid Al-Adhab, Salam M. Joori, Enam Azez Al-Tameemi","doi":"10.33762/bsurg.2019.164511","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Endometrial pathologies represent a diagnostic challenge for radiologist and gynecologist due to dynamic changes of the endometrium, wide variability in imaging appearance and overlap between benign and malignant causes of endometrial abnormalities. Although tissue analysis via dilatation and curettage, endometrial biopsy or hysteroscopy is the backbone in the diagnosis, these tests are invasive, not without complications and may be difficult to perform in certain circumstances, hence the need for noninvasive imaging methods to aid in the diagnosis and triaging the patient for subsequent invasive procedures as well as contribution in treatment planning. This study aimed to evaluate the role of diffusion weighted imaging (DWI) with apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) value measurement in differentiating benign from malignant uterine endometrial lesions. The study included 47 patients with endometrial lesions divided into two groups according to the result of histopathological analysis; the malignant group consisting from 18 cases and the benign group consisting from 29 cases, the latter was further subdivided into: polyp, hyperplasia and other benign entities. Pelvic magnetic resonance imaging with DWI performed for each patient with visual evaluation of signal intensity on diffusion and ADC value measurement. Subsequently mean ADC values for each group were calculated and compared, and validity measures for the optimal cut-off values for differentiating benign from malignant lesions were determined. The mean±standard deviation for ADC value (x10-3mm2/sec) for malignant group was 0.71±0.12, and for benign group was 1.52±0.42, with a significant difference between the two groups (P value <0.01), there was no significant difference in ADC value between the subdivision of benign group. At ADC cut-off value of 0.976x10-3mm2/sec, the sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value and negative predictive value and accuracy of DWI in detecting endometrial carcinoma were 100%, 89.6%, 85.71%, 100% and 93.62% respectively. In conclusion, DWI with ADC value measurement is a valuable non-invasive diagnostic test, aiding in the differentiation of benign from malignant uterine endometrial cavity lesions.","PeriodicalId":52765,"journal":{"name":"Basrah Journal of Surgery","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-12-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Basrah Journal of Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.33762/bsurg.2019.164511","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Endometrial pathologies represent a diagnostic challenge for radiologist and gynecologist due to dynamic changes of the endometrium, wide variability in imaging appearance and overlap between benign and malignant causes of endometrial abnormalities. Although tissue analysis via dilatation and curettage, endometrial biopsy or hysteroscopy is the backbone in the diagnosis, these tests are invasive, not without complications and may be difficult to perform in certain circumstances, hence the need for noninvasive imaging methods to aid in the diagnosis and triaging the patient for subsequent invasive procedures as well as contribution in treatment planning. This study aimed to evaluate the role of diffusion weighted imaging (DWI) with apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) value measurement in differentiating benign from malignant uterine endometrial lesions. The study included 47 patients with endometrial lesions divided into two groups according to the result of histopathological analysis; the malignant group consisting from 18 cases and the benign group consisting from 29 cases, the latter was further subdivided into: polyp, hyperplasia and other benign entities. Pelvic magnetic resonance imaging with DWI performed for each patient with visual evaluation of signal intensity on diffusion and ADC value measurement. Subsequently mean ADC values for each group were calculated and compared, and validity measures for the optimal cut-off values for differentiating benign from malignant lesions were determined. The mean±standard deviation for ADC value (x10-3mm2/sec) for malignant group was 0.71±0.12, and for benign group was 1.52±0.42, with a significant difference between the two groups (P value <0.01), there was no significant difference in ADC value between the subdivision of benign group. At ADC cut-off value of 0.976x10-3mm2/sec, the sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value and negative predictive value and accuracy of DWI in detecting endometrial carcinoma were 100%, 89.6%, 85.71%, 100% and 93.62% respectively. In conclusion, DWI with ADC value measurement is a valuable non-invasive diagnostic test, aiding in the differentiation of benign from malignant uterine endometrial cavity lesions.
磁共振弥散加权成像和表观弥散系数图鉴别子宫内膜良恶性病变的有效性
子宫内膜病变对放射科医生和妇科医生来说是一个诊断挑战,因为子宫内膜的动态变化、成像外观的广泛可变性以及子宫内膜异常的良性和恶性原因之间的重叠。尽管通过刮宫、子宫内膜活检或宫腔镜进行组织分析是诊断的支柱,但这些检查具有侵入性,并非没有并发症,在某些情况下可能很难进行,因此需要非侵入性成像方法来帮助诊断和对患者进行后续的侵入性手术以及对治疗计划的贡献。本研究旨在评估扩散加权成像(DWI)与表观扩散系数(ADC)值测量在区分子宫内膜良恶性病变中的作用。该研究包括47例子宫内膜病变患者,根据组织病理学分析结果分为两组;恶性组18例,良性组29例,后者进一步细分为:息肉、增生和其他良性实体。对每位患者进行DWI盆腔磁共振成像,并对扩散和ADC值测量的信号强度进行视觉评估。随后计算并比较各组的平均ADC值,并确定区分良恶性病变的最佳截止值的有效性度量。恶性组ADC值(x10-3mm2/sec)的平均±标准差为0.71±0.12,良性组为1.52±0.42,两组之间有显著差异(P<0.01),良性组之间ADC值无显著差异。在ADC截止值为0.976x10-3mm/sec时,DWI检测子宫内膜癌的敏感性、特异性、阳性预测值、阴性预测值和准确性分别为100%、89.6%、85.71%、100%和93.62%。总之,测量ADC值的DWI是一种有价值的非侵入性诊断测试,有助于区分子宫内膜腔良恶性病变。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
8
审稿时长
6 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信