Nurses’ perspectives on delays in care escalation in an acute private hospital

IF 1.6 4区 医学 Q2 NURSING
Suzie Noye , Koshila Kumar , Anastasia Hutchinson , Jane Willcox
{"title":"Nurses’ perspectives on delays in care escalation in an acute private hospital","authors":"Suzie Noye ,&nbsp;Koshila Kumar ,&nbsp;Anastasia Hutchinson ,&nbsp;Jane Willcox","doi":"10.1016/j.colegn.2023.07.006","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Problem</h3><p>Despite mandated Rapid-Response Systems (RRS), hospitals continue to see delays in escalation of care. There is a paucity of research regarding nurses’ perceptions of the reasons for care escalation delays in the private hospital setting in which there is a different model of care and hierarchy of the medical system. It is important to understand how these elements may influence the approach to escalating care.</p></div><div><h3>Aim</h3><p>To explore nurses’ perspectives and experiences of clinical deterioration and the factors impacting on timely escalation of care in a private, non-profit hospital.</p></div><div><h3>Method</h3><p>Twenty-three bedside and leadership nurses were purposively recruited. Qualitative descriptive methodology employed interviews and focus groups to explore knowledge of, and belief in RRS criteria and process, individual confidence, perceived barriers, and RRS education. Data were analysed thematically.</p></div><div><h3>Findings</h3><p>Three major themes were elicited. First, hierarchy and a culture of indecisiveness. Second, gatekeeping and protocol adherence impacting on timely escalation. Third, the importance of confidence in the nurse role to escalate care. Communication barriers and inconsistent leadership were common threads across all themes.</p></div><div><h3>Discussion</h3><p>RRS have been shown to be effective, however, if escalation criteria are implemented inconsistently, individual’s prior experience can impact interdisciplinary communication, RRS processes and patient outcomes.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>The effectiveness of RRS is dependent on a supportive workplace culture, good communication, and consistent leadership. Further research is required to understand the optimal mechanisms for implementing RRS processes in private, non-profit hospitals.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":55241,"journal":{"name":"Collegian","volume":"30 5","pages":"Pages 660-667"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Collegian","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1322769623000768","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Problem

Despite mandated Rapid-Response Systems (RRS), hospitals continue to see delays in escalation of care. There is a paucity of research regarding nurses’ perceptions of the reasons for care escalation delays in the private hospital setting in which there is a different model of care and hierarchy of the medical system. It is important to understand how these elements may influence the approach to escalating care.

Aim

To explore nurses’ perspectives and experiences of clinical deterioration and the factors impacting on timely escalation of care in a private, non-profit hospital.

Method

Twenty-three bedside and leadership nurses were purposively recruited. Qualitative descriptive methodology employed interviews and focus groups to explore knowledge of, and belief in RRS criteria and process, individual confidence, perceived barriers, and RRS education. Data were analysed thematically.

Findings

Three major themes were elicited. First, hierarchy and a culture of indecisiveness. Second, gatekeeping and protocol adherence impacting on timely escalation. Third, the importance of confidence in the nurse role to escalate care. Communication barriers and inconsistent leadership were common threads across all themes.

Discussion

RRS have been shown to be effective, however, if escalation criteria are implemented inconsistently, individual’s prior experience can impact interdisciplinary communication, RRS processes and patient outcomes.

Conclusion

The effectiveness of RRS is dependent on a supportive workplace culture, good communication, and consistent leadership. Further research is required to understand the optimal mechanisms for implementing RRS processes in private, non-profit hospitals.

护士对急性私立医院护理升级延误的看法
尽管强制要求建立快速反应系统(RRS),但医院在升级护理方面仍然存在延误。关于护士对私立医院设置中护理升级延迟原因的看法的研究缺乏,其中存在不同的护理模式和医疗系统的层次结构。了解这些因素如何影响逐步升级的护理方法是很重要的。目的探讨某民营非营利性医院护士对临床恶化的看法和体会,以及影响护理及时升级的因素。方法有目的地招募床边及领导护士23名。定性描述方法采用访谈和焦点小组来探索对RRS标准和过程、个人信心、感知障碍和RRS教育的知识和信念。数据按主题进行分析。研究结果引出了三个主要主题。首先,等级制度和优柔寡断的文化。第二,把关和协议遵守影响及时升级。第三,信心对护士角色升级护理的重要性。沟通障碍和不一致的领导是所有主题的共同线索。RRS已被证明是有效的,然而,如果升级标准的实施不一致,个人之前的经验可能会影响跨学科的沟通,RRS过程和患者的结果。结论RRS的有效性取决于支持性的工作场所文化、良好的沟通和一致的领导。需要进一步的研究来了解在私立非营利性医院实施RRS流程的最佳机制。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Collegian
Collegian NURSING-
CiteScore
2.70
自引率
6.70%
发文量
127
审稿时长
72 days
期刊介绍: Collegian: The Australian Journal of Nursing Practice, Scholarship and Research is the official journal of Australian College of Nursing (ACN). The journal aims to reflect the broad interests of nurses and the nursing profession, and to challenge nurses on emerging areas of interest. It publishes research articles and scholarly discussion of nursing practice, policy and professional issues. Papers published in the journal are peer reviewed by a double blind process using reviewers who meet high standards of academic and clinical expertise. Invited papers that contribute to nursing knowledge and debate are published at the discretion of the Editor. The journal, online only from 2016, is available to members of ACN and also by separate subscription. ACN believes that each and every nurse in Australia should have the opportunity to grow their career through quality education, and further our profession through representation. ACN is the voice of influence, providing the nursing expertise and experience required when government and key stakeholders are deciding the future of health.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信