{"title":"Nurses’ perspectives on delays in care escalation in an acute private hospital","authors":"Suzie Noye , Koshila Kumar , Anastasia Hutchinson , Jane Willcox","doi":"10.1016/j.colegn.2023.07.006","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Problem</h3><p>Despite mandated Rapid-Response Systems (RRS), hospitals continue to see delays in escalation of care. There is a paucity of research regarding nurses’ perceptions of the reasons for care escalation delays in the private hospital setting in which there is a different model of care and hierarchy of the medical system. It is important to understand how these elements may influence the approach to escalating care.</p></div><div><h3>Aim</h3><p>To explore nurses’ perspectives and experiences of clinical deterioration and the factors impacting on timely escalation of care in a private, non-profit hospital.</p></div><div><h3>Method</h3><p>Twenty-three bedside and leadership nurses were purposively recruited. Qualitative descriptive methodology employed interviews and focus groups to explore knowledge of, and belief in RRS criteria and process, individual confidence, perceived barriers, and RRS education. Data were analysed thematically.</p></div><div><h3>Findings</h3><p>Three major themes were elicited. First, hierarchy and a culture of indecisiveness. Second, gatekeeping and protocol adherence impacting on timely escalation. Third, the importance of confidence in the nurse role to escalate care. Communication barriers and inconsistent leadership were common threads across all themes.</p></div><div><h3>Discussion</h3><p>RRS have been shown to be effective, however, if escalation criteria are implemented inconsistently, individual’s prior experience can impact interdisciplinary communication, RRS processes and patient outcomes.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>The effectiveness of RRS is dependent on a supportive workplace culture, good communication, and consistent leadership. Further research is required to understand the optimal mechanisms for implementing RRS processes in private, non-profit hospitals.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":55241,"journal":{"name":"Collegian","volume":"30 5","pages":"Pages 660-667"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Collegian","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1322769623000768","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Problem
Despite mandated Rapid-Response Systems (RRS), hospitals continue to see delays in escalation of care. There is a paucity of research regarding nurses’ perceptions of the reasons for care escalation delays in the private hospital setting in which there is a different model of care and hierarchy of the medical system. It is important to understand how these elements may influence the approach to escalating care.
Aim
To explore nurses’ perspectives and experiences of clinical deterioration and the factors impacting on timely escalation of care in a private, non-profit hospital.
Method
Twenty-three bedside and leadership nurses were purposively recruited. Qualitative descriptive methodology employed interviews and focus groups to explore knowledge of, and belief in RRS criteria and process, individual confidence, perceived barriers, and RRS education. Data were analysed thematically.
Findings
Three major themes were elicited. First, hierarchy and a culture of indecisiveness. Second, gatekeeping and protocol adherence impacting on timely escalation. Third, the importance of confidence in the nurse role to escalate care. Communication barriers and inconsistent leadership were common threads across all themes.
Discussion
RRS have been shown to be effective, however, if escalation criteria are implemented inconsistently, individual’s prior experience can impact interdisciplinary communication, RRS processes and patient outcomes.
Conclusion
The effectiveness of RRS is dependent on a supportive workplace culture, good communication, and consistent leadership. Further research is required to understand the optimal mechanisms for implementing RRS processes in private, non-profit hospitals.
期刊介绍:
Collegian: The Australian Journal of Nursing Practice, Scholarship and Research is the official journal of Australian College of Nursing (ACN).
The journal aims to reflect the broad interests of nurses and the nursing profession, and to challenge nurses on emerging areas of interest. It publishes research articles and scholarly discussion of nursing practice, policy and professional issues.
Papers published in the journal are peer reviewed by a double blind process using reviewers who meet high standards of academic and clinical expertise. Invited papers that contribute to nursing knowledge and debate are published at the discretion of the Editor.
The journal, online only from 2016, is available to members of ACN and also by separate subscription.
ACN believes that each and every nurse in Australia should have the opportunity to grow their career through quality education, and further our profession through representation. ACN is the voice of influence, providing the nursing expertise and experience required when government and key stakeholders are deciding the future of health.