Comparative Arterial Blood Gas Analysis in Post Septoplasty Patients with Conventional Nasal Packs Versus Nasal Packs with Airway.

IF 0.6 Q3 Medicine

Indian Journal of Otolaryngology and Head and Neck Surgery Pub Date : 2023-12-01 Epub Date: 2023-05-15 DOI:10.1007/s12070-023-03847-6

Ramya Rajpurohit, Neha Salaria, Uma Garg

{"title":"Comparative Arterial Blood Gas Analysis in Post Septoplasty Patients with Conventional Nasal Packs Versus Nasal Packs with Airway.","authors":"Ramya Rajpurohit, Neha Salaria, Uma Garg","doi":"10.1007/s12070-023-03847-6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"To evaluate levels of arterial blood gases in patients undergoing septoplasty, with conventional nasal packing versus those with nasal packing with airway. The current prospective comparative study was conducted on 68 patients undergoing septoplasty, who were divided randomly into two groups-conventional nasal packs (ANP) and nasal packs with airway (ANP-A). Arterial blood gas analysis alongwith objective symptoms of patients were recorded and evaluated. The difference between pre and post operative values of SpO2 (ANP = 6.73 ± 1.17, ANP-A = 2.84 ± 0.91) and pO2 (ANP = 15.09 ± 4.34, ANP-A = 3.46 ± 1.49) between the two groups was statistically significant (p = 0.001). Differences in post operative pH, pCO2 and HCO3 between the two groups was not statistically significant. Significant difference between the two groups was observed in patients' objective symptoms as well. Nasal packs with airway have lesser perturbing effects on septoplasty patients as compared to conventional nasal packs.","PeriodicalId":13287,"journal":{"name":"Indian Journal of Otolaryngology and Head and Neck Surgery","volume":"1 1","pages":"2802-2808"},"PeriodicalIF":0.6000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10645705/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Indian Journal of Otolaryngology and Head and Neck Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s12070-023-03847-6","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/5/15 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

Abstract

To evaluate levels of arterial blood gases in patients undergoing septoplasty, with conventional nasal packing versus those with nasal packing with airway. The current prospective comparative study was conducted on 68 patients undergoing septoplasty, who were divided randomly into two groups-conventional nasal packs (ANP) and nasal packs with airway (ANP-A). Arterial blood gas analysis alongwith objective symptoms of patients were recorded and evaluated. The difference between pre and post operative values of SpO₂ (ANP = 6.73 ± 1.17, ANP-A = 2.84 ± 0.91) and pO₂ (ANP = 15.09 ± 4.34, ANP-A = 3.46 ± 1.49) between the two groups was statistically significant (p = 0.001). Differences in post operative pH, pCO₂ and HCO₃ between the two groups was not statistically significant. Significant difference between the two groups was observed in patients' objective symptoms as well. Nasal packs with airway have lesser perturbing effects on septoplasty patients as compared to conventional nasal packs.

查看原文本刊更多论文

鼻中隔成形术后常规鼻填充物与带气道鼻填充物的动脉血气对比分析

评估中隔成形术患者的动脉血气水平，常规鼻填充物与气道鼻填充物。本前瞻性比较研究选取68例中隔成形术患者，随机分为常规鼻填充物组(ANP)和带气道鼻填充物组(ANP- a)。记录患者动脉血气分析及客观症状。两组术前、术后SpO2 (ANP = 6.73±1.17,ANP- a = 2.84±0.91)、pO2 (ANP = 15.09±4.34,ANP- a = 3.46±1.49)比较，差异均有统计学意义(p = 0.001)。两组术后pH、pCO2、HCO3差异无统计学意义。两组患者的客观症状也有显著差异。与常规鼻填充物相比，带气道的鼻填充物对鼻中隔成形术患者的干扰作用较小。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

求助全文

约1分钟内获得全文求助全文

来源期刊

Indian Journal of Otolaryngology and Head and Neck Surgery Medicine-Otorhinolaryngology

CiteScore

0.90

自引率

0.00%

发文量

226

审稿时长

3 months

期刊介绍： Indian Journal of Otolaryngology and Head & Neck Surgery was founded as Indian Journal of Otolaryngology in 1949 as a scientific Journal published by the Association of Otolaryngologists of India and was later rechristened as IJOHNS to incorporate the changes and progress. IJOHNS, undoubtedly one of the oldest Journals in India, is the official publication of the Association of Otolaryngologists of India and is about to publish it is 67th Volume in 2015. The Journal published quarterly accepts articles in general Oto-Rhino-Laryngology and various subspecialities such as Otology, Rhinology, Laryngology and Phonosurgery, Neurotology, Head and Neck Surgery etc. The Journal acts as a window to showcase and project the clinical and research work done by Otolaryngologists community in India and around the world. It is a continued source of useful clinical information with peer review by eminent Otolaryngologists of repute in their respective fields. The Journal accepts articles pertaining to clinical reports, Clinical studies, Research articles in basic and applied Otolaryngology, short Communications, Clinical records reporting unusual presentations or lesions and new surgical techniques. The journal acts as a catalyst and mirrors the Indian Otolaryngologist’s active interests and pursuits. The Journal also invites articles from senior and experienced authors on interesting topics in Otolaryngology and allied sciences from all over the world. The print version is distributed free to about 4000 members of Association of Otolaryngologists of India and the e-Journal shortly going to make its appearance on the Springer Board can be accessed by all the members. Association of Otolaryngologists of India and M/s Springer India group have come together to co-publish IJOHNS from January 2007 and this bondage is going to provide an impetus to the Journal in terms of international presence and global exposure.