A Comparative Study of the Effectiveness of Lumbar Steroid Injection in Kambin’s Triangle Versus Conventional Transforaminal Approach for the Treatment of Lumbar Radicular Pain: A Prospective Randomised Study

Q4 Medicine
Gauresh Singh, R. Dr, A. Paswan, A. Rath
{"title":"A Comparative Study of the Effectiveness of Lumbar Steroid Injection in Kambin’s Triangle Versus Conventional Transforaminal Approach for the Treatment of Lumbar Radicular Pain: A Prospective Randomised Study","authors":"Gauresh Singh, R. Dr, A. Paswan, A. Rath","doi":"10.54875/jarss.2022.28199","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT Objective: Low back pain is a very troublesome and common issue among patients irrespective of age and sex and is very difficult to manage with conservative management. It can lead to disability and mental issues. Methods: After ethical committee approval, a prospective, randomised, double-blind comparative study on 40 patients aged 20-70 years, suffering from lumbar radicular pain was carried out by two different approaches i.e., conventional transforaminal and Kambin’s triangle approach and epidural steroids were administered. Change in pain intensity using the Verbal Numerical Rating Scale was recorded as our primary outcome. Change in functional status using Oswestry Disability Index and Patient Satisfaction Score were our secondary outcomes. Any adverse event, complication, failure was also noted. Results: Multiple logistic regression showed no difference in pain relief or improvement of functional status due to variable differences like the age, sex, disc level or the type of approach. Conclusion: Both approaches of transforaminal epidural steroid injection were effective in reducing pain and increasing functional status significantly. There was no significant difference in their effectiveness and neither was superior to the other. Keywords: Low back pain, transforaminal approach, Kambin’s triangle approach","PeriodicalId":36000,"journal":{"name":"Anestezi Dergisi","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-07-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Anestezi Dergisi","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.54875/jarss.2022.28199","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

ABSTRACT Objective: Low back pain is a very troublesome and common issue among patients irrespective of age and sex and is very difficult to manage with conservative management. It can lead to disability and mental issues. Methods: After ethical committee approval, a prospective, randomised, double-blind comparative study on 40 patients aged 20-70 years, suffering from lumbar radicular pain was carried out by two different approaches i.e., conventional transforaminal and Kambin’s triangle approach and epidural steroids were administered. Change in pain intensity using the Verbal Numerical Rating Scale was recorded as our primary outcome. Change in functional status using Oswestry Disability Index and Patient Satisfaction Score were our secondary outcomes. Any adverse event, complication, failure was also noted. Results: Multiple logistic regression showed no difference in pain relief or improvement of functional status due to variable differences like the age, sex, disc level or the type of approach. Conclusion: Both approaches of transforaminal epidural steroid injection were effective in reducing pain and increasing functional status significantly. There was no significant difference in their effectiveness and neither was superior to the other. Keywords: Low back pain, transforaminal approach, Kambin’s triangle approach
Kambin三角区腰类固醇注射与传统经孔入路治疗腰根痛疗效的比较研究:前瞻性随机研究
摘要目的:腰痛在不分年龄和性别的患者中是一个非常麻烦和常见的问题,保守治疗非常困难。它可能导致残疾和精神问题。方法:在伦理委员会批准后,对40名年龄在20-70岁的腰椎根性疼痛患者进行了一项前瞻性、随机、双盲的比较研究,采用两种不同的方法,即常规经孔和Kambin三角入路,并给予硬膜外类固醇。使用言语数字评定量表记录疼痛强度的变化作为我们的主要结果。使用Oswestry残疾指数和患者满意度评分的功能状态变化是我们的次要结果。还注意到任何不良事件、并发症和失败。结果:多元逻辑回归显示,由于年龄、性别、椎间盘水平或入路类型等变量差异,疼痛缓解或功能状态改善没有差异。结论:经孔硬膜外类固醇注射两种方法均能明显减轻疼痛,提高功能。它们的有效性没有显著差异,也都不优于另一种。关键词:腰痛、经椎间孔入路、Kambin三角入路
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Anestezi Dergisi
Anestezi Dergisi Medicine-Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine
CiteScore
0.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
45
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信