Reduced Tillage and Intercropping as a Means to Increase Yield and Financial Return in the Drylands of Tigray, northern Ethiopia: A Case Study under Rainfed and Irrigation Conditions

IF 0.3 Q4 MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES
Alemtsehay Tsegay, A. Kidane, G. Tesfay, Girmay Kahsay, B. Abrha, J. Aune
{"title":"Reduced Tillage and Intercropping as a Means to Increase Yield and Financial Return in the Drylands of Tigray, northern Ethiopia: A Case Study under Rainfed and Irrigation Conditions","authors":"Alemtsehay Tsegay, A. Kidane, G. Tesfay, Girmay Kahsay, B. Abrha, J. Aune","doi":"10.4314/MEJS.V10I2.4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Intensive tillage is a major sustainability concern in cereal dominated cropping systems in the drylands of Tigray, Ethiopia. Hence, on-farm trials were conducted to investigate the yield and economic advantage of reduced tillage and intercropping for two seasons. A factorial experiment in a complete randomized block design was carried out at Adigudom located in Hintalo-Wajirat district in South-Eastern Tigray in 2014 (rain-fed) and 2015 (irrigated). The experiment consisted of four tillage frequencies (zero, one, two and four) and three types of cropping systems (sole maize, sole soybean and maize-soybean intercropping) in three/four replications. Maize, variety “Melkassa 2”, and soybean, variety “Awassa 91” were used. Grain and biomass yields, and harvest index of both crops were analysed. Yield advantage of intercropping was evaluated using land equivalent ratio (LER) and partial budget analysis was used for the financial evaluation. The grain and biomass yields of both crops were significantly increased (p<0.05) as the tillage frequencies increased from zero to four in both seasons but the frequent tillage with sole cropping was not economically viable as the two times tillage with maize-soybean intercropping gave 126% greater net benefit compared to the four times tillage sole maize, which is practiced by farmers in the study area. The net benefit was strongly influenced by the main effects of tillage and intercropping in both seasons (p<0.001) and by their interaction in 2014 (p<0.05). Significantly higher LER (1.87-2.12) was recorded from maize-soybean intercropping over sole cropping in all the tillages and both seasons. Hence, two alternative options are suggested that farmers could apply in the drylands of Tigray: (i) keeping the sole cropping culture of maize production, and reducing number of tillages from 4 to 2 that would give 374%and 705% Marginal Rate of Return (MRR), respectively, under the rainfed and irrigated conditions compared to zero tillage sole maize; or (ii) intercropping maize with soybean and reducing tillage frequency from 4to 2 that would give 608% and 585% MRR in the respective growing seasons, compared to zero tillage maize-soybean intercropping. Taking these results into account, two times tillage combined with maize-soybean intercropping can be a good option in dryland areas of Tigray to achieve higher total intercrop yield at a low cost and larger LER. Moreover, reduced tillage can minimize soil degradation and benefit farmers with poor access to draft power or female-headed households constrained with labour for ploughing. Keywords : Tillage; Intercropping; Maize; Soybean; Tigray; Ethiopia. Please find erratum for this article here:  https://dx.doi.org/10.4314/mejs.v11i1.10","PeriodicalId":18948,"journal":{"name":"Momona Ethiopian Journal of Science","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.3000,"publicationDate":"2019-02-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.4314/MEJS.V10I2.4","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Momona Ethiopian Journal of Science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4314/MEJS.V10I2.4","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

Abstract

Intensive tillage is a major sustainability concern in cereal dominated cropping systems in the drylands of Tigray, Ethiopia. Hence, on-farm trials were conducted to investigate the yield and economic advantage of reduced tillage and intercropping for two seasons. A factorial experiment in a complete randomized block design was carried out at Adigudom located in Hintalo-Wajirat district in South-Eastern Tigray in 2014 (rain-fed) and 2015 (irrigated). The experiment consisted of four tillage frequencies (zero, one, two and four) and three types of cropping systems (sole maize, sole soybean and maize-soybean intercropping) in three/four replications. Maize, variety “Melkassa 2”, and soybean, variety “Awassa 91” were used. Grain and biomass yields, and harvest index of both crops were analysed. Yield advantage of intercropping was evaluated using land equivalent ratio (LER) and partial budget analysis was used for the financial evaluation. The grain and biomass yields of both crops were significantly increased (p<0.05) as the tillage frequencies increased from zero to four in both seasons but the frequent tillage with sole cropping was not economically viable as the two times tillage with maize-soybean intercropping gave 126% greater net benefit compared to the four times tillage sole maize, which is practiced by farmers in the study area. The net benefit was strongly influenced by the main effects of tillage and intercropping in both seasons (p<0.001) and by their interaction in 2014 (p<0.05). Significantly higher LER (1.87-2.12) was recorded from maize-soybean intercropping over sole cropping in all the tillages and both seasons. Hence, two alternative options are suggested that farmers could apply in the drylands of Tigray: (i) keeping the sole cropping culture of maize production, and reducing number of tillages from 4 to 2 that would give 374%and 705% Marginal Rate of Return (MRR), respectively, under the rainfed and irrigated conditions compared to zero tillage sole maize; or (ii) intercropping maize with soybean and reducing tillage frequency from 4to 2 that would give 608% and 585% MRR in the respective growing seasons, compared to zero tillage maize-soybean intercropping. Taking these results into account, two times tillage combined with maize-soybean intercropping can be a good option in dryland areas of Tigray to achieve higher total intercrop yield at a low cost and larger LER. Moreover, reduced tillage can minimize soil degradation and benefit farmers with poor access to draft power or female-headed households constrained with labour for ploughing. Keywords : Tillage; Intercropping; Maize; Soybean; Tigray; Ethiopia. Please find erratum for this article here:  https://dx.doi.org/10.4314/mejs.v11i1.10
埃塞俄比亚北部提格雷旱地减少耕作和间作以提高产量和经济回报:在雨养和灌溉条件下的案例研究
在埃塞俄比亚提格雷旱地以谷物为主的种植系统中,集约耕作是一个主要的可持续性问题。因此,进行了田间试验,以调查两个季节的减少耕作和间作的产量和经济效益。采用完全随机区设计,于2014年(雨养)和2015年(灌溉)在提格雷东南部Hintalo-Wajirat区的Adigudom进行了因子试验。试验包括4个耕作频率(0、1、2和4)和3种种植制度(单玉米、单大豆和玉米-大豆间作),分3 / 4个重复。玉米品种“Melkassa 2”和大豆品种“Awassa 91”。分析了两种作物的粮食和生物量产量以及收获指数。采用土地当量比(LER)评价间作的产量优势,采用部分预算分析进行财务评价。两季耕作频率均从0次增加到4次,两种作物的粮食和生物量产量均显著增加(p<0.05),但频繁的单作耕作在经济上不可行,玉米-大豆间作两次耕作的净效益比研究区农民单作玉米4次耕作的净效益高126%。净效益受两季耕作和间作的主效应(p<0.001)和2014年两者的交互作用(p<0.05)的强烈影响。玉米-大豆套作在所有耕作方式和两个季节的LER值均显著高于单作(1.87 ~ 2.12)。因此,建议农民在提格雷旱地采用两种替代方案:(i)保持玉米生产的单作栽培,并将耕作次数从4次减少到2次,在旱作和灌溉条件下,与玉米零耕作相比,边际收益率分别为374%和705%;或(ii)玉米与大豆间作,并将耕作次数从4次减少到2次,与玉米-大豆间作相比,在各自的生长季节,玉米-大豆的MRR分别为608%和585%。考虑到这些结果,两次耕作与玉米-大豆间作结合可以在提格雷旱地地区以较低的成本和较大的LER实现较高的间作总产量。此外,减少耕作可以最大限度地减少土壤退化,并使难以获得动力的农民或受耕地劳动力限制的女性户主家庭受益。关键词:耕作;间作;玉米;大豆;提格雷;埃塞俄比亚。请在这里找到本文的勘误:https://dx.doi.org/10.4314/mejs.v11i1.10
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Momona Ethiopian Journal of Science
Momona Ethiopian Journal of Science MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES-
自引率
0.00%
发文量
13
审稿时长
12 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信